A preference-based interpretation of other agents' actions

Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 33-42

  Lang, Jérôme ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COSTS; DECISION THEORY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET THEORY;

ACTIVE AGENTS; NON-SOLUTION PLANS; PLAN RECOGNITION; STRATEGIC INTERACTIONS;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 13444265160     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Brafman, R., and Tennenholtz, M. 1997. Modeling agents as qualitative decision makers. Artificial Intelligence 94.
2. Davison, B. D., and Hirsh, H. 1998. Predicting sequences of user actions. In Proceedings of the 1998 AAAI/ICML Workshop "Predicting the Future: AI Approaches to Time Series Analysis".
3. Doyle, J., and Wellman, M. P. 1991. Preferential semantics for goals. In Proceedings of AAAI-91, 698-703.
4. Gorniak, P., and Poole, D. 2000. Predicting future user actions by observing unmodified assumptions. In Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000).
5. Hong, J. 2001. Goal recognition through goal graph analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 15:1-30.
6. Isozaki, H., and Katsuno, H. 1996. A semantic characterization of an algorithm for estimating others' beliefs from observation. In Proceedings of AAAI-96, 543-549.
7. Kautz, H., and Allen, J. 1986. Generalized plan recognition. In Proceedings of AAAI-86, 32-37.
8. Levesque, H. 2001. Talk given at MFI-01 (Toulouse, May 2001).
9. Lin, F. 1998. On measuring plan quality (a preliminary report). In Proceedings of KR'98, 224-232.
10. Pollack, M. E. 1990. Plans as complex mental attitudes. In Cohen, P. R.; Morgan, J.; and Pollack, M. E., eds., Intentions in Communication. MIT Press.