R&D networks and product innovation patterns - Academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks

Technovation

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1025-1037

  Löfsten, Hans ^a   Lindelöf, Peter ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

New technology based firms; Product innovation; R D networks; Science parks

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PARKS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; STUDENTS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

EMPLOYMENT GROWTH; NEW TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS; PRODUCT INNOVATION; SCIENCE PARKS;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 13444259701     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Ambrosio J. Incubators nurture start-up firms: do incubators really work? Computerworld. 25:(5):1991;105-106
2. Barney J.B. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science. 42:1986;1231-1241
3. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 17:(1):1991;99-120
4. Birley S. The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing. 1:1985;107-117
5. Chandler G.N., Hanks S.H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing. 9:1994;331-349
6. Christensen J.F. Asset profiles for technological innovation. Research Policy. 24:1995;727-745
7. Coff R.W. Human assets and management dilemmas: coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Academy of Management Review. 22:(2):1997;374-402
8. Cooper A.C. Spin-offs and technical entrepreneurship. IEEE Transactions and Engineering Management. 18:(1):1971;2-6
9. Cooper A.C. Contrasts in the role of incubator organisations in the founding of growth-oriented firms. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College. 1984
10. Currie J. Science Parks in Britain - their Role for the late 1980s. 1985;CSP Economic Publications, Cardiff
11. Daft R. Organization theory and design. 1983;West, New York
12. Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal. 34:1991;555-590
13. Das T.K., Teng B.-S. Time and entrepreneurial risk behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 22:(2):1997;69-88
14. Deeds D., Decarolis D.L., Coombs J.E. The determinants of research productivity in high technology ventures: an empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing. 15:(2):2000;211-229
15. Eisenhardt K., Schoonhoven C. Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment and growth among US semi-conductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:1990;504-529
16. Eul F.M. Science Parks and Innovation Centres-Property, the unconsidered element. Gibb J.M. Science Parks and Innovation Centres: their economic and social impact. 1985;Elsevier, Amsterdam
17. Felsenstein D. University-related science parks-seedbeds or enclaves of innovation? Technovation. 14:(2):1994;93-110
18. Freel M.S. Evolution, innovation and learning: Evidence from case studies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 10:(2):1998;137-149
19. Grant R.M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review. 33:1991;114-135
20. Gregory W.D., Sheahen T.P. Technology transfer by spin-off companies. Brett A.M., Gibson D.V., Smilor R.W. University Spin-Offs Companies - Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs and Technology Transfer. 1991;Rowan and Littlefield Publisher Inc
21. Gulati R. Network location and learning: the influence of network and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal. 20:(5):1999;397-420
22. Gulati R., Nohria N., Zaheer A. Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue. 21:(3):1999;203-207
23. Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal. 15:(1):1994;63-84
24. Johannisson B. Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: spatial and functional patterns. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 10:1998;297-312
25. Jones-Evans D. Technical entrepreneurship, strategy and experience. International Small Business Journal. 14:(3):1996;15-39
26. Kelly T. The UK computer industry. 1987;Croom Helm, London
27. Klofsten M., Jonsson M., Simón J. Supporting the pre-commercialization stages of technology-based firms; the effects of small-scale venture capital. Venture Capital. 1:1998;83-93
28. Lane P., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning. Strategic Management Journal. 9:1998;461-477
29. Lindholm Dahlstrand Å., Wikström A. Teknikpark som tillväxtmiljö (in Swedish). 1998;Teknikbrostiftelsen, Stockholm
30. Lorenzoni G., Ornati O.A. Constellations of firms and new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing. 3:1988;41-57
31. LU 92. Näringslivets utveckling till - tillväxt eller stagnation (in Swedish). Bilaga. 3:2002;121-122
32. Löfsten H., Lindelöf P. Science Parks in Sweden - Industrial renewal and development? R&D Management. 31:(3):2001;309-322
33. Löfsten H., Lindelöf P. Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms - academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy. 31:(6):2002;859-876
34. Löwegren-Williams M. Advantages of a science park location: case studies from the Ideon science park. 2000;University of Lund
35. MacDonald S. British science parks: reflections on the politics of high technology. R&D Management. 17:(1):1987;25-37
36. Malecki E.J. Technology and Economic Development: the Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Change. 1991;Longman, London
37. McDougall P., Phillips P., Covin J.G., Robinson R.B. Jr, Herron L. The effects of industry growth and strategic breath on new venture performance and strategy content. Strategic Management Journal. 15:(7):1994;537-554
38. Massey D., Quintas P., Wield. High Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, Science and Space. 1992;Routledge, London
39. McMullan E.D., Chrisman J.J., Vesper K. Some problems in using subjective measures of effectiveness to evaluate entrepreneurial assistance programs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 26:(1):2001;37-54
40. Mian S. Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy. 25:1996;325-335
41. Monck C.S.P., Porter R.B., Quintas P., Storey D.J., Wynarczyk P. Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. 1988;Croom Helm, London
42. Oakey R. Innovation and the management of marketing in high technology small firms. Journal of marketing Management. 7:1991;343-356
43. Oakey R. High Technology-Based Firms, Variable Barriors to Growth. International Small Business Journal. 13:(3):1995;103-104
44. OECD. The Future of University Research. 1981;Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris
45. OECD. Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Technology and Competitiveness. 1993;Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris
46. Penrose E.T. The theory of the growth of the firm. 1959;Basil Blackwell, Oxford
47. Peteraf M.A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal. 14:1993;179-191
48. Pouder R., St John R. Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review. 21:1996;1192-1225
49. Quintas P., Wield D., Massey D. Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation. 12:(3):1992;161-175
50. Reed R., DeFillippi R.J. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review. 15:1990;88-102
51. Roberts E.B., Wainer H.A. New enterprises on route 128. Science Journal, (December). 1968;78-83
52. Rumelt R.P. Towards a strategic theory of the. Lamb R.B. Competitive Strategic Management. 1984;566-570 Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, NJ
53. Rumelt R.P. Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship. Teece D.J. Competitive Challenge. 1987;137-158 Harper and Row, NY
54. Sahlin-Andersson K. Forskningsparker och företagsrelationer: Etablering av Novum forskningspark i organisationsteoretisk belysning (in Swedish). 1990;Regionplane- och trafikkontoret, Stockholm
55. Santoro M.D., Gopalakrishnan S. Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: their impact on technology transfer activities. Journal of technology Transfer. 26:2001;163-171
56. Siegel D.S., Westhead P., Wright M. Science Parks and the performance of new technology-based firms: a review of recent UK evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Business Economics. 20:2003;177-184
57. Smilor R.W., Gibson D.V., Dietrich G.B. University spin-out companies: technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing. 5:(1):1990;63-76
58. Taylor C., Silberston A. The economic impact of the patent system. 1973;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
59. Teece D.J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaborating, licensing and public policy. Research Policy. 15:1986;285-305
60. Teece D.J. Inter-organizational requirements of the innovation process. Managerial and Decision Economics, Special Issue. 1989;35-42
61. Tesfaye, B., 1993, Determinants of entrepreneurial processes: a case study of technology-based spin-off company formation (PhD dissertation), University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
62. Tyler B.B. The complementary of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 18:2001;1-27
63. Uzzi B. The source and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review (August). 61:1996;674-698
64. Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in inter firm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly. 42:1997;35-67
65. Westhead P. R&D inputs and outputs of technology-based firms located on and off Science Parks. R&D Management. 27:(1):1997;45-62
66. Westhead P., Storey D.J. An Assessment of Firms Located On and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom. 1994;HMSO, London
67. Westhead P., Storey D.J. Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms. Omega. 23:(4):1995;345-360
68. Williams B.R. The direct and indirect role of higher education in industrial innovation - what should we expect? 1985;Technical Change Centre, London
69. Yli-Renko H., Autio E., Sapienza H.J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal. 22:2001;587-613
70. Zukin S., DiMaggio P.J. Structure of Capital. 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK