Comparison of preoperative templating with post-operative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 40-44

  Suh, Kuen Tak ^a   Cheon, Sang Jin ^a   Kim, Dae Woong ^a  

^a Pusan National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACETABULUM; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LEG LENGTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 1342347906     PISSN: 00016470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708070     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bose W J. Accurate limb-length equalization during total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2000; 23: 433-6.
2. Capello W N. Preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 1986; 35: 249-57.
3. Charnley J. Technique of low friction arthroplasty of the hip. In: Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag 1979: 246.
4. D'Antonio J A. Preoperative templating and choosing the implant for primary THA in the young patient. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 1994; 43: 339-46.
5. Deyerle W M. Complications of hip prostheses: An atlas of new preventive technical aids. Clin Orthop 1967; 53: 61-79.
6. Dore D D, Rubash H E. Primary total hip arthroplasty in the older patient: Optimizing the results. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 1994; 43: 347-57.
7. Eggli S, Pisan M, Müller M E. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80: 382-90.
8. Friberg O. Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip joint in leg length inequality. Spine 1983; 8: 643-51.
9. Giles L G F, Taylor J R. Low-back pain associated with leg length inequality. Spine 1981; 6: 510-21.
10. Harris W H. Revision surgery for failed, nonseptic total hip arthroplasty. The femoral side. Clin Orthop 1982; 170: 8-20.
11. Hoikka V, Santavirta S, Eskola A, Paavilainen T, Wirta J, Lindholm T S. Methodology for restoring functional leg length in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6: 189-93.
12. Knight W E. Accurate determination of leg lengths during total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1977; 123: 27-8.
13. Love B R T, Wright K. Leg length discrepancy after total hip joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1983; 65: 103.
14. Moseley C F. Leg length discrepancy. Orthop Clin North Am 1987; 18: 529-35.
15. Turula K B, Friberg O, Lindholm T S, Tallroth K, Vankka E. Leg length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1986; 202: 163-8.
16. Visuri T. Long-term results and survivorship of the McKee-Farrar total hip prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987; 106: 368-74.
17. Williamson J A, Reckling F W. Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip joint replacement. Clin Orthop 1978; 134: 135-8.
18. Woolson S T. Leg length equalization during total hip replacement. Orthopedics 1990; 13: 17-21.