Relation of family history of prostate cancer to perceived vulnerability and screening behavior

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 80-85

  Jacobsen, Paul B ^a   Lamonde, Laurie A ^a   Honour, Melissa ^a   Kash, Kathryn ^b   Hudson, Perry B ^c   Pow Sang, Julio ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Bay Pines VA Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIGEN DETECTION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY HISTORY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PROSTATE CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PEDIGREE; PERCEPTION; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 1342347873     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.760     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK et al. 1994. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol 13: 122-129.
2. Armitage CJ, Conner M. 2001. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Social Psychol 40: 471-499.
3. Baron RM, Kenny DA. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51: 1173-1182.
4. Barry MJ. 2001. Prostate-specific-antigen testing for early diagnosis of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 344: 1373-1377.
5. Bratt O, Damber J-E, Emanuelsson M et al. 2000. Risk perception, screening practice and interest in genetic testing among unaffected men in families with hereditary prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 36: 235-241.
6. Burack RC, Wood DP. 1999. Screening for prostate cancer. Med Clinics N Am 83: 1423-1442.
7. Close DR, Kristal AR, Li S et al. 1998. Associations of demographic and health-related characteristics with prostate cancer screening with Washington State. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7: 627-630.
8. Fishbein M, Azjen I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
9. Janz NK, Becker MH. 1984. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Quart 11: 1-47.
10. Maddux JE, Rogers RW. 1983. Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Exp Social Psychol 19: 469-479.
11. McCaul KD, Branstetter AD, Schroeder DM et al. 1996. What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review. Health Psychol 15: 423-429.
12. Myers RE, Wolf TA, McKee L et al. 1996. Factors associated with intention to undergo annual prostate cancer screening among African American men in Philadelphia. Cancer 78: 471-479.
13. Smith RA, Von Eschenbach AC, Wender R et al. 2001. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: Update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 51: 38-75.
14. Svetec D, Thompson IM. 1998. PSA screening - Current controversy. Ann Oncol 9: 1283-1288.
15. Taylor KL, DiPlacido J, Redd WH et al. 1999. Demographics, family histories, and psychological characteristics of prostate carcinoma screening participants. Cancer 85: 1305-1312.
16. Weinrich SP, Reynolds WA, Tingen MS et al. 2000. Barriers to prostate cancer screening. Cancer Nurs 23: 117-121.
17. Wolf AMD, Naser JF, Wolf AM et al. 1996. The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening. Arch Int Med 156: 1333-1336.
18. Wolf AMD, Schorling JB. 1998. Preferences of elderly men for prostate-specific antigen screening and the impact of informed consent. J Gerontol 53: M195-M200.