Accuracy of ultrasonography and plain-film abdominal radiography in the diagnosis of urologic abnormalities in men with urinary tract infection: Critically appraised topic

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 16-17

  Daunt, Stephen W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLADDER EXAMINATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; HUMANS; HYDRONEPHROSIS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URETERAL CALCULI; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY TRACT; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 1342321674     PISSN: 08465371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Andrews SJ, Brooks PT, Hanbury DC, King CM, Prendergast CM, Boustead GB, et al. Ultrasonography and abdominal radiography versus intravenous urography in the investigation of urinary tract infection in men: prospective incident cohort study. BMJ 2002;324(7335):454-6.
2. Ansell G, Bettman MA, Kaufman JA, Wilkins RA, editors. Complications in diagnostic imaging and interventional radiology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1996.