A comparison of ordinary least squares and logistic regression

Ohio Journal of Science

Volumn 103, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 118-125

  Pohlmann, John T ^a   Leitner, Dennis W ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; REGRESSION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 1342312225     PISSN: 00300950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Cox DR, Snell EJ. 1989. The Analysis of Binary Data. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall. 236 p.
2. Hocking RR. 1985. The Analysis of Linear Models. Monterey: Brooks/Cole. 385 p.
3. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 307 p.
4. Howell DC. 2002. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 5th ed. Pacific Grove (CA): Duxbury. p 728-31.
5. King EN, Ryan TP. 2002. A preliminary investigation of maximum likelihood logistic regression versus exact logistic regression. American Statistician 56(3):163-70.
6. Menard S. 1995. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage Univ Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences series no. 07-106. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage. 98 p.
7. National Center for Education Statistics. 1995. Statistical Analysis Report January 1995 High School and Beyond: 1992 Descriptive Summary of 1980 High School Sophomores 12 Years Later. Washington: US Dept of Education. 112 p.
8. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed., vol. 2. Cary (NC): SAS Institute. 846 p.