Acoustic Analyses Support Subjective Judgments of Vocal Emotion

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1000, Issue , 2003, Pages 288-292

  Monnot, Marilee ^a,b   Orbelo, Diana ^a   Riccardo, Luciana ^a   Sikka, Seema ^c   Ross, Elliott ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic analyses; Affective prosody; Subjective judgment; Vocal emotion

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; AFFECT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ALCOHOLISM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DETOXIFICATION; EMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; LANGUAGE; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPEECH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 1342305647     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1280.027     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. SCHERER, K.R. 1995. Expression of emotion in voice and music. J. Voice 9(3): 235-248.
2. ROSS, E.D., J.A. EDMONDSON & G.B. SEIBERT. 1986. The effect of affect on various acoustic measures of prosody in tone and non-tone languages: a comparison based on computer analysis of voice. J. Phonetics 14: 283-302.
3. ROSS, E.D. et al. 1987. Acoustic analysis of affective prosody during right-sided Wada test: a within-subjects verification of the right hemisphere's role in language. Brain Lang. 33: 128-145.
4. ROSS, E.D. et al. 1992. Affective exploitation of tone in Taiwanese: an acoustical study of "tone latitude." J. Phonetics 20: 441-456.
5. SCHERER, K.R. & J.S. OSHINSKY. 1977. Cue utilization in emotion attributes from auditory stimuli. Motiv. Emotion 1: 331-346.
6. SCHERER, K.R. 1979. Acoustic concomitants of emotional dimensions: judging affect from synthesized tone sequences. In Non-verbal Communication, 2nd edit. S. Weitz, Ed.: 249-253. Oxford University Press. New York.
7. MURRAY, I.R. & J.L. ARNOTT. 1993. Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93(2): 1097-1108.
8. BANSE, R. & K.R. SCHERER. 1996. Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70(3): 614-636.
9. WHITESIDE, S.P. 1999. Note on voice and perturbation measures in simulated vocal emotions. Percept. Mot. Skills 88(3 Pt. 2): 1219-1222.
10. WHITESIDE, S.P. 1999. Acoustic characteristics of vocal emotions simulated by actors. Percept. Mot. Skills. 89(3 Pt. 2): 1195-1208.
11. SOBIN, C. & M. ALPERT. 1999. Emotion in speech: the acoustic attributes of fear, anger, sadness, and joy. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28(4): 347-365.
12. SAS INSTITUTE. 2000. JMP Statistical Discovery Software. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC.
13. MONNOT, M. et al. 2001. Abnormal emotional perception in alcoholics: deficits in comprehension of affective prosody. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 25(3): 362-369.
14. MONNOT, M., D. ORBELO & E.D. ROSS. 2001. Affective prosodic production in alcoholics. Presented at Social Cognitive Neuroscience Symposium. University of California, Los Angeles.
15. MONNOT, M. et al. 2002. Neurological basis of deficits in affective prosody comprehension among alcoholics and fetal alcohol exposed adults. J. Neuropsychol. Clin. Neurosci. 14(3): 321-328.
16. ROSS, E.D., R.D. THOMPSON & J. YENKOSKY. 1997. Lateralization of affective prosody in brain and the callosal integration of hemispheric language functions. Brain Lang. 56: 27-54.
17. MONNOT, M. 1999. Function of infant-directed speech. Hum. Nat. Interdisc. Biosoc. Perspect. 10(4): 415-443.