Surgical Intervention in Enchondral and Membranous Bone: Intraindividual Comparisons in the Rabbit

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 263-268

  Slotte, Christer ^a,b   Lundgren, Dan ^a   Sennerby, Lars ^a   Lundgren, Anna Karin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b INSTITUTE FOR POSTGRADUATE DENTAL EDUCATION   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone density; Bone healing; Dental implants; Surgical trauma

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE GROWTH; BONE INJURY; BONE MARROW; BONE PLATE; BONE STRUCTURE; BONE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; DRILL; EDENTULOUSNESS; ENCHONDRAL OSSIFICATION; FEMALE; JAW; MALE; MAXILLA; METAPHYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; ORAL SURGERY; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PARAMETER; PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RABBIT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL INJURY; TIBIA; TRABECULAR BONE;

EID: 1342302783     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00209.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Albrektsson T. In vivo studies of bone grafts. The possibility of vascular anastomoses in healing bone. Acta Orthop Scand 1980; 51:9-17.
2. Johansson CB. On tissue reactions to metal implants. Gothenburg, Sweden: Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, University of Gothenburg, 1991.
3. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone. Part I. Light microscopic observations. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1993; 4:240-250.
4. Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Sennerby L. Measurements of stability changes of titanium implants with exposed threads subjected to barrier membrane induced bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:316-322.
5. Buckwalter JA, Glimcher MJ, Cooper RR, Recker R. Bone biology. Part II: formation, form, modeling, remodeling, and regulation of cell function. J Bone J Surg 1995; 77-A: 1276-1289.
6. Smith JD, Abramson M. Membranous vs endochondral bone autografts. Arch Otolaryngol 1974; 99:203-205.
7. Kuziak JF, Zins JE, Whitaker LA. The early revascularization of membranous bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76:510-516.
8. Alberius P, Dahlin C, Linde A. Role of osteopromotion in experimental bone grafting to the skull: a study in adult rats using a membrane technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50:829-834.
9. Gordh M, Alberius P. Some basic factors essential to autogeneic nonvascularized onlay bone grafting to the craniofacial skeleton. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999; 33:129-146.
10. Mital M, Cohen J. Repair of experimental bony intramedullary injuries varying in degree. Surg Forum 1966; 17:451-452.
11. Amsel S, Maniatis A, Tavassoli M, Crosby WH. The significance of intramedullary cancellous bone formation in the repair of bone marrow tissue. Anat Rec 1969; 164:101-111.
12. Danckwardt-Lillieström G. Reaming of the medullary cavity and its effect on diaphyseal bone. A fluorochromic, microangiographic and histologic study on the rabbit tibia and dog femur. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1969; 128:1-153.
13. Uddströmer L, Ritsilä V. Healing of membranous and long bone defects. An experimental study in growing rabbits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 13:281-287.
14. Chisin R, Gazit D, Ulmansky M, Laron A, Atlan H, Sela J. 99mTc-MDP uptake and histological changes during rat bone marrow regeneration. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B 1988; 15:469-476.
15. Richany SF, Sprinz H, Kraner K, Ashby J, Merrill TG. The role of the diaphyseal medulla in the repair and regeneration of the femoral shaft in the adult cat. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1965; 47:1565-1584.
16. Lundgren D, Lundgren AK, Sennerby L. The effect of mechanical intervention on jaw bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:54-59.
17. Weibel ER, Kistler GS, Scherle WF. Practical stereological methods for morphometric cytology. J Cell Biol 1966; 30:23-38.
18. Röhlich K. Über die Beziehungen zwischen der Knochensubstanz und der Blutbildung im Knochenmark. Z Mikr Anat Forsch 1941; 49:425-464.
19. Brånemark PI, Breine U, Johansson B, Roylance PJ, Röckert H, Yoffey JM. Regeneration of bone marrow. Acta Anat 1964; 59:1-46.
20. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984; 86:95-111.
21. Aspenberg P. Bone induction in rodents and primates. Lund, Sweden: Department of Orthopedics, Lund University, 1988.
22. Aspenberg P, Lohmander LS, Thorngren KG. Failure of bone induction by bone matrix in adult monkeys. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70-B:625-627.
23. Pinholt EM. Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation studies. Oslo, Norway: Department of Oral Surgery and Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University, 1992.
24. Ozaki W, Buchman SR, Goldstein SA, Fyhrie DP. A comparative analysis of the microarchitecture of cortical membranous and cortical endochondral onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104:139-147.
25. Harris WH, Haywood EA, Lavorgna J, Hamblen DL. Spatial and temporal variation in cortical bone formation in dogs. A long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1968; 50A: 1118-1128.
26. Najjar TA, Kahn D. Comparative study of healing and remodeling in various bones. J Oral Surg 1977; 35:375-379.
27. Strid KG. Radiographic results. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, London, Berlin, Rio de Janeiro, and Tokyo: Quintessence, 1985:187-198.
28. Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: A. Hirschwald, 1892.
29. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66: 397-402.