메뉴 건너뛰기
BMJ
Volumn 328, Issue 7437, 2004, Pages 465-
Validity of Canadian studies: Response of editor of BMJ
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; CANADA; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
EID: 1342301563     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7437.465-b     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (2)
References (3)
  • 1
    • 2442640517 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies
    • (10 January.)
    • White C. Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies. BMJ 2004; 328: 67. (10 January.)
    • (2004) BMJ , vol.328 , pp. 67
    • White, C.1
  • 2
    • 85007664837 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies
    • (31 January.)
    • Corrections and clarifications. Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies. BMJ 2004; 328: 257. (31 January.)
    • (2004) BMJ , vol.328 , pp. 257
  • 3
    • 85007672059 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nutrient supplements and health. Electronic response to: Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies
    • (accessed 31 Jan 2004
    • Chandra RK. Nutrient supplements and health. Electronic response to: Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies. bmj.com 2003. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/328/7431/67#47651 (accessed 31 Jan 2004.
    • (2003) bmj.com
    • Chandra, R.K.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.