Is MRI effective in detecting intraarticular abnormalities of the injured knee?

Journal Medical Libanais

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 168-174

  Ghanem, Ismat ^a   Abou Jaoude, Suha ^a   Kharrat, Khalil ^a   Dagher, Fernand ^a  

^a SAINT JOSEPH UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; INTRAARTICULAR FRACTURE; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; KNEE INJURY; KNEE LIGAMENT; KNEE MENISCUS RUPTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTHROSCOPY; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENISCI, TIBIAL; MIDDLE AGED; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 1342300555     PISSN: 00239852     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Erikson SJ, Waldschmidt JG, Czervionke LF, et al. Hyaline cartilage; truncation artifact as a cause of trilaminar appearance with fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled sequences. Radiology 1996; 201: 260-4.
2. Frank LR, Brossmann J, Buxton RB, et al. MR imaging truncation artifacts can create a false laminar appearance in cartilage. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 547-54.
3. Ochi M, Sumen Y, Kanda T, et al. The diagnostic value and limitation of magnetic resonance imaging on chondral lesions in the knee joint. J Arthroscopy 1994; 10: 176-84.
4. Peterfy CG, Janzen DL, Tirman PFJ, et al. "Magic angle" phenomenon: a cause of increased signal in the normal lateral meniscus on short-TE-MR images of the knee. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 164: 149-54.
5. Stanitski CL. Correlation of arthroscopic and clinical examination with magnetic resonance imaging findings of injured knees in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 2-6.
6. Lee JK, Yaol L, Phelps CT, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament tears: MR Imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests. Radiology 1988; 166: 861-4.
7. Crues JV III, Mink JH, Levy TL, et al. Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 164: 445-8.
8. Recht MP, Piraino DW, Patletta GA, et al. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patello-femoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 1996; 198: 209-12.
9. Blackburn WD, Berneuter WK, Rominger M, et al. Arthroscopic evaluation of the knee articular cartilage: a comparison with plain radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 675-9.
10. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 127-32.
11. Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee: an evaluation with the use of fast spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998; 80: 1276-84.
12. Fisher SP, Fox JM, DelPizzo W, et al. Accuracy of diagnosis from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1991; 73: 2-10.
13. Raunest J, Oberle K, Loehnert J, et al. The clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of meniscal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1997; 73: 11-16.
14. Mink JH, Levy TL. Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci of the knee: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1988; 167: 769-74.
15. Quinn SF, Brown TF. Meniscal tears diagnosed with MR imaging v/s arthroscopy: how reliable a standard is arthroscopy? Radiology 1991; 181: 834-47.
16. Zobel MS, Borello JA, Siegel MJ, et al. Pediatric knee MR imaging: pattern of injuries in the immature skeleton. Radiology 1994; 190: 397-401.
17. La Prade RF, Quinter MB, Veenstra MA, et al. The prevalence of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings in asymptomatic knees: with correlation of magnetic resonance imaging to arthroscopic findings in symptomatic knees. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 739-45.
18. DeSmet AA, Norris MA, Yandow DR, et al. MR diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee: importance of high signal in the meniscus that extends to the surface. Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 101-7.
19. Bui-Mansfield LT, Youngberg RA, Warme W, et al. Potential cost savings of MR imaging obtained before arthroscopy of the knee: evaluation of 50 consecutive patients. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 914-8.
20. Gelb HJ, Glascow SG, Sapega AA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee disorders: clinical value and cost effectiveness in a sports medicine practice. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 99-103.
21. Glashow JL, Katz R, Schneider M, et al. Double-blind assessment of the value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate and meniscal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1989; 71: 113-19.
22. Kelly MA, Flock TJ, Kimmel JA, et al. MR imaging of the knee: clarification of its role. Arthroscopy 1991; 7: 78-85.
23. Mandelbaum BR, Finerman GA, Reicher MA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool for evaluation of traumatic knee injuries. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14: 361-70.
24. McDermott MJ, Bathgate B, Gillingham BL, et al. Correlation of MRI and arthroscopic diagnosis of knee pathology in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 1998; 18: 675-8.
25. Polly DW, Callaghan JJ, Sikes RA, et al. The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70: 192-8.
26. Spiers ASD, Meagher T, Ostler ST, et al. Can MRI of the knee affect arthroscopic practice? A prospective study of 58 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75: 49-52.
27. King SJ, Carty HML, Barty O. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee injuries in children. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26: 287-90.
28. Jackson DW, Jennings LD, Maywood RM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16: 29-38.