Assessing depth of sociocognitive processing in peer groups' science discussions

Research in Science Education

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 457-477

  Hogan, Kathleen ^a  

^a CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1342297660     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461590     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1099-1114.
2. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
3. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85.
4. Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2,202-221.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. G. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, & instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Gloser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. BouJaoude, S. B. (1992). The relationship between students' learning strategies and change in their misunderstandings during a high school chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 689-699.
8. Cavallo, A. M., & Schafer, L. E. (1994). Relationships between students' meaningful learning orientation and their understanding of genetics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37,393-418.
9. Chafe, W. L. (1993). Prosodie and functional units of language. In J. A. Edwards, & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (33-43). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Como, L., & Kafher, R. (1993). The role of volition in learning and performance. In L. DarlingHammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 19, pp. 301-341). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
11. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing : A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
12. Derry, S. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31, 163-174.
13. Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Gumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J.A. Edwards, & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (45-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
15. Hegarty-Hazel, E., & Presser, M. (1991a). Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies, Part 1: Student learning in physics. International journal of Science Education, 13, 303-312.
16. Hegarty-Hazel, E., & Presser, M. (1991b). Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies, Part 2: Student learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 421-429.
17. Hogan, K. (in press). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
18. Hogan, K., & Fisherkeller, J. (1996). Representing students' thinking about nutrient cycling in ecosystems: Bidimensional coding of a complex topic. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 941-970.
19. Hogan, K., & Fisherkeller, J. (in press). Dialogue as data: Assessing students' scientific reasoning with interactive protocols. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view. Academic Press: Educational Psychology Series.
20. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (in press). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction.
21. Keiny, S., & Shachak, M. (1987). Educational model for environmental-cognition development. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 449-458.
22. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 338-368.
23. Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D., & Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30,249-270.
24. Marion, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). Qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcomes and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46,4-11.
25. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36-55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
26. Moss, E. (1992). The socioaffective context of joint cognitive activity. In L. T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children's development within social context: Vol. 2. Research and methodology (pp. 117-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Nastasi, B. K., & Clements, D. H. (1991). Research on cocperative learning: Implications for practice. School Psychology Review, 20,110-131.
28. Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39,1-21.
30. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63,167-199.
31. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development (Vol. 5, pp. 89-129). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351-371.
33. Tyson, L. M., Venville, G. J., Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1997). A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom. Science Education, 81, 387-404.
34. Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68,149-171.
35. Wertsch, J. V. (1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
36. Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327-353.
37. Wittrock, M. C. (1994). Generative science teaching. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.), The content of science (pp. 29-38). Washington, D. C.: Palmer Press.