Opinions of professional buyers toward a new, alternative red meat: Ostrich

Agribusiness

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 247-256

  Gillespie, Jeffrey ^a   Taylor, Gary ^b   Schupp, Alvin ^b   Wirth, Ferdinand ^b  

^a State University of New York   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1342285756     PISSN: 07424477     EISSN: 15206297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199805/06)14:3<247::AID-AGR7>3.0.CO;2-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. P. Van Zyl., “A Global Perspective of the Ostrich Industry,” American Ostrich, August (1996).
2. G. Taylor., A. Schupp., J. Gillespie., M. Garcia., and J. Smith., “Current and Potential Markets for Emu and Ostrich Meat, Hides and Leather,” inEconomic Analysis of Slaughter Market Opportunities for the Ratite Industry in Louisiana, final report submitted to the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry in partial fulfillment of requirements of a grant funded by Federal-State Marketing Improvement Program, AMS, USDA, February 12, 1997.
3. G. Taylor., L. Andrews., J. Gillespie., and A. Schupp., “How Do Ratite Meats Compare with Beef?: Implications for Marketing,” in Economic Analysis of Slaughter Market Opportunities for the Ratite Industry in Louisiana, final report submitted to the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry in partial fulfillment of requirements of a grant funding by Federal-State Marketing Improvement Program, AMS, USDA, February 12, 1997.
4. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Ostrich Meat Industry Development, final report to the American Ostrich Association, June 1993, revised October 1994.
5. C. Halbrendt., J. R. Bacon., and J. Pesek., “Weighted Least Squares Analysis for Conjoint Studies: The Case of Hybrid Striped Bass,” Agribusiness: An International Journal, 8, 2(1992).
6. B. H. Lin., S. Payson., and J. Wertz., “Opinions of Professional Buyers Toward Organic Produce: A Case Study of Mid-Atlantic Market for Fresh Tomatoes,” Agribusiness: An International Journal, 12, 1(1996).
7. J. Q. Lang., and E. M. Crown., “Country of Origin Effect in Apparel Choices: A Conjoint Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 17, 1(1993).
8. C. Gan., and E. J. Luzar., “A Conjoint Analysis of Waterfowl Hunting in Louisiana,” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 25, 2(1993).
9. G. A. Baker., and P. J. Crosbie., “Measuring Food Safety Preferences: Identifying Consumer Segments,” Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics, 18, 2(1993).
10. B. E. Prentice., and D. Benell., “Determinants of Empty Returns by U. S. Refrigerated Trucks: Conjoint Analysis Approach,” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40, 1(1992).
11. D. A. Dillman., “The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys,” Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225(1991).
12. Bretton-Clark, Conjoint Designer Manual, Bretton-Clark, New York, 1987.
13. F. F. Wirth., C. K. Halbrendt., and G. F. Vaughn., Conjoint Analysis of the Mid-Atlantic Food-Fish Market for Farm Raised Hybrid Striped Bass, Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 488, University of Delaware, College of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension, Newark, DE, November 1990.
14. J. L. Anderson., and S. U. Bettencourt., Using a Conjoint Approach to Model Product Preferences: The New England Market for Fresh and Frozen Salmon, Contribution 2678, University of Rhode Island/AES, 1991.
15. W. H. Greene., Econometric Analysis, Macmillan, New York, 1990.
16. G. S. Madalla., Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1983.