Influence of innovative techniques on midterm results in patients with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and off-pump coronary artery bypass

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-36

  Toumpoulis, Ioannis K ^a   Anagnostopoulos, Constantine E ^a,b   Katritisis, Demosthenes G ^a   Shennib, Hani ^c   DeRose, Joseph J ^b   Swistel, Daniel G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM PERFORATION; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEPSIS; STROKE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 1342283809     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/hsf.1062     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abu-Omar Y, Taggart DP. 2002. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Lancet 360:327-30.
2. Al Ruzzeh S, Nakamura K, Athanasiou T, et al. 2003. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:50-5.
3. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. 2002. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet 359:1194-9.
4. Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. 2000. Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 69:704-10.
5. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Gomes WJ, et al. 1999. Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:685-90.
6. Baumgartner FJ, Gheissari A, Capouya ER, et al. 1999. Technical aspects of total revascularization in off-pump coronary bypass via sternotomy approach. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1653-8.
7. Cleveland JC Jr, Shroyer AL, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. 2001. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1282-8.
8. Detter C, Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, et al. 2002. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB): two techniques for beating heart surgery. Heart Surg Forum 5:157-62.
9. Gundry SR, Romano MA, Shattuck OH, Razzouk AJ, Bailey LL. 1998. Seven-year follow-up of coronary artery bypasses performed with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1273-7.
10. Haase M, Sharma A, Fielitz A, et al. 2003. On-pump coronary artery surgery versus off-pump exclusive arterial coronary grafting: a matched cohort comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 75:62-7.
11. Hart JC, Spooner TH, Pym J, et al. 2000. A review of 1,582 consecutive Octopus off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1017-20.
12. Magee MJ, Jablonski KA, Stamou SC, et al. 2002. Elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass improves early survival for multivessel coronary artery bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1196-202.
13. Mehran R, Dangas G, Stamou SC, et al. 2000. One-year clinical outcome after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Circulation 102:2799-802.
14. Michel P, Roques F, Nashef SAM. 2003. Logistic or additive EuroSCORE for high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:684-7.
15. Nashef SA, Roques F, Hammill BG, et al. 2002. Validation of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) in North American cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22:101-5.
16. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, et al. 2003. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 348:394-402.
17. Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Marshall JJ, et al. 2001. Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1477-83.
18. Puskas JD, Wright CE, Ronson RS, et al. 1999. Clinical outcomes and angiographic patency in 125 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Heart Surg Forum 2:216-21.
19. Riha M, Danzmayr M, Nagele G, et al. 2002. Off pump coronary artery bypass grafting in EuroSCORE high and low risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:193-8.
20. Rose EA. 2003. Off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 348:379-80.
21. Shennib H. 2001. A renaissance in cardiovascular surgery: endovascular and device-based revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 72:S993-4.
22. Spooner TH, Dyrud PE, Monson BK, Dixon GE, Robinson LD. 1998. Coronary artery bypass on the beating heart with the Octopus: a North American experience. Ann Thorac Surg 66:1032-5.
23. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, et al. 2001. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 104:1761-6.
24. Yacoub M. 2001. Off-pump coronary bypass surgery: in search of an identity. Circulation 104:1743-5.
25. Yokoyama T, Baumgartner FJ, Gheissari A, et al. 2000. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass in high-risk subgroups. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1546-50.