Note on CKM matrix renormalization

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Liao, Yi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1342281790     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.016001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 531 (1963)
2. M. Kobayashi and M. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
3. W.J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Nucl. Phys. B93, 303 (1975).
4. A. Denner and T. Sack, Nucl. Phys. B347, 203 (1990).
5. K.I. Aoki, Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. 73, 1 (1982).
6. P. Gambino, P.A. Grassi, and F. Madricardo, Phys. Lett. B 454, 98 (1999).
7. B.A. Kniehl, F. Madricardo, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. D 62, 073010 (2000).
8. A. Barroso, L. Brücher, and R. Santos, Phys. Rev. D 62, 096003 (2000).
9. K.-P.O. Diener and B.A. Kniehl, Nucl. Phys. B617, 291 (2001).
10. Y. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 64, 036008 (2001).
11. A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D 65, 115013 (2002).
12. D. Espriu, J. Manzano, and P. Talavera, Phys. Rev. D 66, 076002 (2002).
13. Y. Zhou, J. Phys. G 29, 1031 (2003).
14. It has been proposed in Ref. 8 to express directly the counterterm for the CKM matrix in terms of those of rotation angles and (Formula presented) phase in a given representation. However, as explained here, this is not possible without removing a rephasing beforehand.