Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion

Spinal Cord

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 91-98

  Dallmeijer, A J ^a   Zentgraaff, I D B ^a   Zijp, N I ^a   Van Der Woude, L H V ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Gross mechanical efficiency; Handcycling; Heart rate; Nondisabled subjects; Oxygen uptake; Paraplegia; Power output

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; EXHAUSTION; HANDCYCLING; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NETHERLANDS; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PARAPLEGIA; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WHEELCHAIR;

ADULT; ARM; BICYCLING; EXERCISE TEST; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MUSCLE FATIGUE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PARAPLEGIA; REFERENCE VALUES; RESPIRATION; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; WHEELCHAIRS;

EID: 1342280399     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101566     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Sawka MN, Glaser RM, Wilde SW, Luhrte TCv. Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise. J Appl Physiol: Resp Envir Exerc Physiol 1980; 49: 784-788.
2. Glaser RM, Sawka MN, Brune MF, Wilde SW. Physiological responses to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry. J Appl Physiol 1980; 48: 1060-1064.
3. Smith PA et al. Arm crank vs handrim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 249-254.
4. Woude LHVvd et al. Wheelchair ergonomics and physiology testing of prototypes. Ergonomics 1986; 29: 1561-1573.
5. McConnell TJ, Horvat MA, Beutel-Horvat TA, Golding LA. Arm crank versus wheelchair treadmill ergometry to evaluate the performance of paraplegics. Paraplegia 1989; 27: 307-313.
6. Sedlock DA, Knowlton RG, Fitzgerald PI. Circulatory and metabolic responses of women to arm crank and wheelchair ergometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 97-100.
7. Martel G, Noreau L, Jobin J. Physiological responses to maximal exercise on arm cranking and wheelchair ergometer with paraplegics. Paraplegia 1991; 29: 447-456.
8. Woude LHVvd et al. Biomechanics and physiology in active manual wheelchair propulsion. Med Eng Phys 2001; 23: 713-733.
9. Woude LHvd, Dallmeijer AJ, Janssen TW, Veeger D. Alternative modes of manual wheelchair ambulation: an overview. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 765-777.
10. Oertel J, Brundig B, Henze W, Engel P. Spiroergometric field-study of wheelchair propulsion with different handdrive systems. In: Woude LHVvd, Hopman MTE, Kemenade CH (eds) Biomedical Aspects of Manual Wheelchair Propulsion: The State of the Art II. IOS Press: Amsterdam 1999, pp 296-299.
11. Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 391-399.
12. Wicks JR, Oldridge NB, Cameron BJ, Jones NL. Arm cranking and wheelchair ergometry in elite spinal-cord-injured athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 224-231.
13. Tropp H, Samuelsson K, Jorfeldt L. Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry. Br J Sports Med 1997; 31: 41-44.
14. Gass EM, Harvey LA, Gass GC. Maximal physiological responses during arm cranking and treadmill wheelchair propulsion in T4-T6 paraplegic men. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 267-270.
15. MacArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch V. Exercise Physiology Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance. Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD 1996.
16. Hintzy F, Tordi N, Perrey S. Muscular efficiency during arm cranking and wheelchair exercise: a comparison. Int J Sports Med 2002; 23: 408-414.
17. Price MJ, Campbell IG. Thermoregulatory and physiological responses of wheelchair athletes to prolonged arm crank and wheelchair exercise. Int J Sports Med 1999; 20: 457-463.
18. Mossberg K et al. Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry. Spinal Cord 1999; 37: 569-574.
19. Dallmeijer AJ, van der Woude LH, Veeger HE, Hollander AP. Effectiveness of force application in manual wheelchair propulsion in persons with spinal cord injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 77: 213-221.
20. Gass GC, Camp EM. The maximum physiological responses during incremental wheelchair and arm cranking exercise in male paraplegics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1984. 16: 355-359.
21. Hopman MT, Oeseburg B, Binkhorst RA. Cardiovascular responses in paraplegic subjects during arm exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1992; 65: 73-78.