Habitat influence on fish community assemblage in an agricultural landscape in four east central Indiana streams

Journal of Freshwater Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 141-148

  Sullivan, Bridget E ^a   Rigsby, Leah S ^a   Berndt, Andrea ^a   Jones Wuellner, Melissa ^a   Simon, Thomas P ^a   Lauer, Thomas ^a   Pyron, Mark ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL CATCHMENT; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; HABITAT TYPE; ICHTHYOFAUNA; INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY; LAND USE; LOTIC ENVIRONMENT;

INDIANA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ICHTHYOFAUNA;

EID: 1342266036     PISSN: 02705060     EISSN: 21566941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2004.9664521     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berkman, H. E., and Rabeni, C. F., 1987. Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environ. Biol. Fish., 18 (4):285–294.
2. Bothel, W., 2000. Section 319 Nonpoint Source Pollution Grdor the White River Watershed- Delaware County. Submitted:March 27, 2000. Sponsored by:Delaware County Soil and Water Conservation District.
3. Carline, R. F., and Klosiewski, S. P., 1985. Responses offish populations to mitigation structures in two small channelized streams in Ohio. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage, 5:1–11.
4. Chapman, D. W., and Knudsen, E., 1980. Channelization and livestock impacts on salmonid habitat and biomass in Western Washington. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 109:357–363.
5. Emerson, J. W., 1971. Channelization:a case study. Science, 173:325–326.
6. Etnier, D. A., 1972. The effect of annual rechanneling on a stream fish population. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 101:372–375.
7. Frothingham, K. M., Rhoads, B. L., and Herricks, E. E., 2002. A multiscale conceptual framework for integrated ecogeomorphological research to support stream naturalization in the agricultural Midwest. Environ. Manage., 29:16–33.
8. Gammon, J. R., 1995. An environmental assessment of the streams of Putnam County, Indiana and vicinity with special emphasis on the effects of animal feedlots. Department of Biological Sciences, Greencastle, IN.
9. Gammon, J. R., 1997. An environmental assessment of the streams of West Central Indiana with special emphasis on the effects of animal feedlots. Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife, Report. Indianapolis, IN.
10. Gammon, J. R., Faatz, W. C., and Simon, T. P., 2003. “ Patterns in water quality and fish assemblages in three Central Indiana streams with emphasis on animal feed lot operations ”. In Biological Response Signatures Indicator Patterns Using Aquatic Communities. Edited by:Simon, Thomas P., 373–417. Boca Raton.:CRC Press.
11. Gorman, O. T., and Karr, J. R., 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology, 59:507–515.
12. Hoggatt, R. E., 1975. Drainage Areas of Indiana Streams. U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey.
13. Hupp, C. R., 1992. Riparian vegetation recovery patterns following stream channelization:a geomorphic perspective. Ecology, 73:1209–1226.
14. Indiana Agricultural Statistics Service. 2000. Indiana Agricultural Statistics 1999–2000. Purdue University. West Lafayette, IN.
15. Johnson, K., 2002. Upper White River Watershed 319 Grant:GIs Data Map Booklet. Dated:March 13, 2002. Upper White River Watershed Management Committee.
16. Muotka, T., Paavoia, R., Haapala, A., Novikrnec, M., and Laasonen, P., 2002. Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biol. Conserv., 105:243–253.
17. Portt, C., Balon, E. K., and Noakes, D. L. G., 1986. Biomass and production of fishes in natural and channelized streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 43:1926–1934.
18. Rabeni, C. F., and Jacobson, R. B., 1999. “ Warmwater streams. p 505- 528. ”. In Inland Fisheries Management in North America. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Edited by:Kohler, C. C., and Hubert, W. A.
19. Rankin, E. T., 1989. The qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI):Rationale, methods, and applications:Columbus, Ohio, State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Water Quality Planning and Assessment.
20. Scamecchia, Dennis L., 1988. The importance of streamlining in influencing fish community structure in channelized and unchannelized reaches of a prairie stream. Regul. River., 2:155–156.
21. Simon, T. P., and Dufour, R., 1998. Development of index of biotic integrity expectations for the ecoregions of Indiana:V. eastern cornbelt plain. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V, Water Division, Watershed and Nonpoint Source Branch, Chicago, IL, EPA 905/R-96/002.
22. Shields, F. D., Jr., Knight, S. S., and Cooper, C. M., 1998. Rehabilitation of aquatic habitats in warmwater streams damaged by channel incision in Mississippi. Hydrobiologia, 382:63–86.
23. Smoger, Roy A., and Paul, L. Angermeier. 1999. “ Effects of drainage basin and anthropogenic disturbance on relations between stream size and IBI metrics in Virginia. ”. In Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. Edited by:Simon, T. P., 249–273. Boca Raton.:CRC Press.
24. Walser, C. A., and Bart, H. L., 1999. Influence of agriculture on in-stream habitat and fish community structure in Piedmont watersheds of the Chattahoochee River system. Ecol. Freshw. Fish., 8:237–246.
25. Wichert, G. A., and Rapport, D. J., 1998. Fish community structure as a measure of degradation and rehabilitation of riparian systems in an agricultural drainage basin. Environ. Manage., 22:425–443.
26. Yoder, C. O., and Smith, M. A., 1999. “ Using fish assemblages in a state biological assessment and criteria program:essential concepts and considerations. ”. In Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. Edited by:Simon, T. P., 17–56. Boca Raton.:CRC Press.