Subjective factors of Cleaner Production - Parallel to risk perception?

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 581-584

  Danihelka, Pavel ^a  

^a VSB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Cleaner Production efficiency; Cleaner production uptake; Perception; Psychological factors; Risk

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HEALTH RISKS; POLLUTION CONTROL; PRODUCTION CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TOXICITY;

CLEANER PRODUCTION (CP) EFFICIENCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

EID: 1342264176     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. 1994;AIChE, New York.
2. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 236:(4799):1987;280-285.
3. Kervern GY. Latest advances in cindynics. Economica Paris; 1994 [ISBN 2-7178-2694-7].
4. Libman J. Elements de surete nucleaire. IPSN, France; 1996 [ISBN 2-86883-274-1].
5. Koval T., Danihelka P. Implementation of Seveso Directive in Czech Republic. Proceedings of VSB Conference of Environment Protection, Ostrava :2000.
6. Francis B.M. Toxic substances in environment. 1993;J. Wiley, New York. [ISBN 0-471-50781-4].