Functional morphology

Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, ICFP

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 213-223

  Forsberg, Markus ^a   Ranta, Aarne ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Embedded Languages; Finite Functions; Functional Programming; Linguistics; Morphological Description

Indexed keywords

EMBEDDED LANGUAGES; FINITE FUNCTIONS; FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING; MORPHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION;

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DATA REDUCTION; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEARNING SYSTEMS; LIBRARIES; LINGUISTICS; MORPHOLOGY;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 13344277310     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. I. Andersson and T. Söderberg. Spanish Morphology - implemented in a functional programming language. Master's Thesis in Computational Linguistics, 2003. http://www.cling.gu.se/theses/finished.html.
2. C. E. Bennett. A Latin Grammar. Allyn and Bacon, Boston and Chicago, 1913.
3. L. Bogavac. Functional Morphology for Russian. Master's Thesis in Computing Science, 2004.
4. K. Ciaessen. An Embedded Language Approach to Hardware Description and Verification. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2000.
5. E. Conrad. Latin grammar. www.math.ohio-state.edu/~econrad/lang/latin.html, 2004.
6. M. Forsberg. Fststudio. http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~markus/fstStudio
7. M. Forsberg and A. Ranta. Svenska ord. http://www.es.chalmers.se/~markus/svenska, 2002.
8. M. Forsberg and A. Ranta. Functional morphology. http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~markus/FM, 2004.
9. C. F. Hockett. Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10:210-234, 1954.
10. P. Hudak. Building domain-specific embedded languages. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4), 1996.
11. P. Hudak. Modular domain specific languages and tools. In P. Devanbu and J. Poulin, editors, Proceedings: Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse, pages 134-142. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1998.
12. G. Huet. Sanskrit site. Program and documentation, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~huet/SKT/, 2000.
13. G. Huet. The Zen Computational Linguistics Toolkit. http://pauillac.inria.fr/~huet/, 2002.
14. G. Huet. Transducers as lexicon morphisms, phonemic segmentation by euphony analysis, application to a sanskrit tagger. Available: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~huet/FREE/, 2003.
15. L. K. Kenneth R. Beesley. Finite State Morphology. CSLI Publications, United States, 2003.
16. G. Klyve. Latin Grammar. Hodder & Stoughton Ltd., London, 2002.
17. K. Koskenniemi. Two-level morphology: a general computational model for word-form recognition and production. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki, 1983.
18. G. G. L. Karttunen, J-P Chanond and A. Schille. Regular expressions for language engineering. Natural Language Engineering, 2:305-328, 1996.
19. A. Labs-Research. At&t fsm library. http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/fsm/.
20. J. Lambek. A mathematician looks at the latin conjugation. Theoretical Linguistics, 1977.
21. E. Meijer and J. van Dijk. Perl for swine: Cgi programming in haskell. Proc. First Workshop on Functional Programming, 1996.
22. S. Peyton Jones and J. Hughes. Report on the Programming Language Haskeil 98, a Non-strict, Purely Functional Language. Available from http://www.haskell.org, February 1999.
23. A. Ranta. Grammatical Framework Homepage, 2000-2004. www.cs.chalmers.se/~aarne/GF/.
24. A. Ranta. 1+n representations of Italian morphology. Essays dedicated to Jan von Plato on the occasion of his 50th birthday, http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/kfil/jvp50.htm, 2001.
25. A. Ranta. Grammatical Framework: A Type-theoretical Grammar Formalism. The Journal of Functional Programming, 14(2): 145-189, 2004.
26. M. K. Ronald M. Kaplan. Regular Models of Phonological Rule Systems. Computational lingustics, pages 331-380, 1994.
27. The World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible Markup Language (XML). http://www.w3.org/XML/, 2000.
28. G. van Noord. Finite state automata utilities. http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/Fsa/
29. Xerox. Xerox finite-state compiler. http://www.xrce.xerox.com/competencies/content-analysis/fsCompiler/.