Towards a documentation maturity model

ACM Special Interest Group for Design. of Commun.; SIGDOC 2003: Finding Real-World Solutions for Doc.: How Theory Informs Pract. and Pract. Informs Theory. Proc. of the 21st Annu. Int. Conf. on Doc.

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 93-99

  Huang, Shihong ^a   Tilley, Scott ^b  

^a University of California Riverside   (United States)

^b Florida Institute of Technology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Documentation; Maturity model; Quality; Reverse engineering

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REVERSE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL WRITING;

DOCUMENTATION; MATURITY MODELS; PRODUCT LIFECYCLES; PRODUCT QUALITY;

SYSTEM PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION;

EID: 13344272041     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/944868.944888     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. nd Edition). Addison-Wesley, 2003.
2. Burnstein, I.; Suwannasart, T.; and Carlson, C. "Developing a Testing Maturity Model". Crosstalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, Part I: 9(8):21-24, August 1996; Part II: 9(9):19-26, September 1996.
3. Burnstein, I.; Suwannasart, T.; and Carlson, C. "Developing a Testing Maturity Model". Crosstalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, Part I: 9(8):21-24, August 1996; Part II: 9(9):19-26, September 1996.
4. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (Paulk, M.; Weber, C.; and Curtis, B. contributors). The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
5. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute. The Integrated Product Development Capability Maturity Model (IPD-CMM). Online at http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmm/ipd-cmm.html. Accessed March 2003.
6. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute. The Software Acquisition Capability Maturity Model (SA-CMM). Online at http://www.sei.cmu. edu/arm/SA-CMM.html. Accessed March 2003.
7. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute. The Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model (SE-CMM). Online at http://www.sei.cmu. edu/cmm/se-cmm.html. Accessed March 2003.
8. Chikofsy, E.; and Cross, J. "Reverse Engineering and Design Recovery: A Taxonomy." IEEE Software 7(1):13-17, January 1990.
9. Chrissis, M.; Konrad, M.; and Shrum, S. CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley, 2003.
10. Crosby, P. "Quality is Free." New York: McGraw-Hill 1979. (Ch. 24)
11. Curtis, B.; Hefley, B.; and Miller, S. The People Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Workforce. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
12. Gamma, E.; Helm, R.; Johnson, R.; and Vlissides, J. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 1994.
13. Hargis, G.; Hernandez, A.; Hughes, P.; Ramaker, J.; Rouiller, S.; Wilde, E. Developing Quality Technical Information: A Handbook for Writers and Editors. Prentice Hall PTR, 1998.
14. th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2001: Santa Fe, NM; October 21-24, 2001), pp. 237-246. ACM Press: New York, NY, 2001.
15. Humphrey, W. Introduction to the Personal Software Process. Addison-Wesley, 1996.
16. Humphrey, W. Introduction to the Team Software Process. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
17. IBM Corp. "UML Resource Center". Online at http://www.rational. com/uml.
18. IBM Corporation (1983). Producing Quality Technical Information. Santa Teresa, CA.
19. ISO/IEC 9126: Information technology - Software Product Evaluation - Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use, 1991.
20. Mandel, T. "Quality Technical Information: Paving the Way for Usable Print and Web Interface Design". ACM Journal of Computer Documentation. 26(3):118-125, August 2002.
21. McCabe, T. "A Complexity Measure." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-7(4):308-320, September 1976.
22. Pierce, R. and Tilley, S. "Automatically Connecting Documentation to Code with Rose". Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2002: October 20-23, 2002; Toronto, Canada), pp. 157-163. ACM Press: New York, NY, 2002.
23. Scott, K. UML Explained. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
24. Smart, K. "Assessing Quality Documents." ACM Journal of Computer Documentation. 26(3): 130-140, August 2002.
25. th Edition). Addison-Wesley, 2001
26. Sun Microsystems. Javadoc. Online at http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/.
27. Tilley, S. "The Canonical Activities of Reverse Engineering." Annals of Software Engineering 9:249-271, 2000.
28. Tilley, S. A Reverse-Engineering Environment Framework (CMU/SEI-98-TR-005). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1998.
29. st Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2003: October 12-15, 2003; San Francisco, CA). ACM Press: New York, NY, 2003.
30. th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2002: October 20-23, 2002; Toronto, Canada), pp. 226-233. ACM Press: New York, NY, 2002.
31. th Annual International Conference on System Documentation (SIGDOC'91: October 10-12 1991; Chicago, IL), pp. 30-36. New York, NY; ACM Press, 1991.
32. th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC '92: Ottawa, ON; October 13-16, 1992), pp. 211-219. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1992.
33. th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC '93: Waterloo, ON; October 5-8, 1993), pp. 325-337. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1993.
34. Waite, B. "Introduction". ACM Journal of Computer Documentation. 26(3):64-65, August 2002.
35. th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2002: October 20-23, 2002; Toronto, Canada), pp. 236-247. ACM Press: New York, NY, 2002.
36. Weiser, M., "Program slicing." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-10(4):352-357, July 1984.