Incorporating landmarks in driver navigation system design: An overview of results from the REGIONAL project

Journal of Navigation

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 47-65

  May, Andrew J ^a   Ross, Tracy ^a   Bayer, Steven H ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design; Landmarks; Navigation; Vehicle

Indexed keywords

NAVIGATION AID;

EID: 13244279732     PISSN: 03734633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463304003054     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Alm, H. (1990). Drivers' cognitive models of routes. In J. A. Rothengatter (Ed.), Laboratory and field studies on route representation and drivers' cognitive models of routes (DRIVE II V1041 GIDS, Deliverable GIDS/NAV2) (pp. 35-48). Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, Traffic Research Centre.
2. Alm, H., Nilsson, L., Jarmark, S., Savelid, J., & Hennings, U. (1992. The effects of landmark presentation on driver performance and uncertainty in a navigation task - a field study (No. S/IT-4): (Swedish Prometheus, Tech. Rep. No. S/IT-4). Linköping, Sweden: VTI.
3. Bengler, K., Haller, R., & Zimmer, A. (1994). Experimental optimisation of route guidance information using context information. Paper presented at the First World Congress on Applications of Transport and Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systemsf, Paris, France.
4. Burnett, G. E. (1998). "Turn right at the King's Head": Drivers' requirements for route guidance information. Unpublished PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.
5. Burns, P. (1997). Navigation and the older driver. Unpublished PhD thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
6. Evans, G. W., Skorpanich, A. A., Garling, T., Bryant, K. J., Bresolin, B. (1984). The effects of pathway configuration, landmarks and stress on environmental cognition. Journal of environmental psychology, 4(4), 323-335.
7. Fairclough, S. H. (1991). Adapting the TLX to Measure Driver Mental Workload (DRIVE Project V1017 (BERTIE) No. Report no. 71). Loughborough, UK: HUSAT Research Institute.
8. Golledge, R. G. (1993). Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. In T. Garling, Golledge, R. G. (Ed.), Behaviour and Environment: psychological and geographical approaches (pp. 16-46). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.
9. Green, P., Hoekstra, E., Williams, M., Wen, C., & George, K. (1993). Examination of a videotape-based method to evaluate the usability of route guidance and traffic information systems (Final No. UMTRI-93-31): (Tech. Rep. No. UMTRI-93-31). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
10. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In N. Meshkati (Ed.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. King, G. F. (1986). Driver performance in highway navigation tasks. Transportation research record (1093), 1-11.
12. May, A. J., Ross, T., & Bayer, S. H. (2003). Drivers' Information Requirements when Navigating in an Urban Environment. The Journal of Navigation, 56, 89-100.
13. Pauzie, A., Daimon, T., Bruyas, M. (1997). How to design landmarks for guidance systems? Paper presented at the 4th World Congress on ITS.
14. Philips, B. H. (1999, September 27-October 1, 1999). The Role of Landmark Information in Intelligent Navigation Displays. Paper presented at the Houston... We Have a Solution!, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting.
15. Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D. (1986). A profile of drivers' map-reading abilities. Human factors, 28(2), 223-239.
16. Wierwille, W. W. (1993). Visual and manual demands of in-car controls and displays. In B. Peacock, Karwowski, W. (Ed.), Automotive Ergonomics (pp. 299-320). London: Taylor and Francis.
17. Wochinger, K., & Boehm-Davis, D. (1997). Navigational preference and driver acceptance of advanced traveler information systems. In I. Y. Noy (Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces (pp. 345-362). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.