Peptic ulcer perforation: Management of high-risk cases by percutaneous abdominal drainage

Tropical Doctor

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 30-31

  Rahman, M Mizanur ^a   Al Mamun, A ^a   Hossain, M Delwar ^a   Das, M Kante ^a  

^a Khulna Medical College   (Bangladesh)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DUODENUM ULCER; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULCER PERFORATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ANTI-ULCER AGENTS; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION;

EID: 13244268324     PISSN: 00494755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/0049475053001822     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Towfigh S, Chandler C, Hines OJ, Mcfadden DW. Outcomes from peptic ulcer surgery have not benefited from advances in medical therapy. Am Surg 2002;68:385-9
2. Crofts TJ, Park KGM, Robert JC, Sydney SC, Arthur KC. A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 1989;320:970-3
3. Irvin TT. Mortality and perforated peptic ulcer: a case for risk stratification in elderly patients. Br J Surg 1989;76:215-18
4. Svanes C, Salvesen H, Svanes K, Soreide O. Perforated peptic ulcer over 56 years. Time trends in patients and disease characteristics. Gut 1993;34:1666-71
5. Marshall C, Ramaswamy P, Bergin FC, Rosenberg IL, Leaper D. Evaluation of protocol for the non operative management of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 1999;86:131-4
6. Fombellida DJ, Romea GI, Mirallas MMJ, Carpi UA. Risk factors in the surgical management of perforated duodenopyloric ulcer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1998;90:503-13
7. Raafat NA. Combined conservative and percutaneous management of perforated duodenal ulcer. Case report. Clin Radiol 1993;47:426-8