|
Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 854-857
|
Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia: Needle-through-needle or separate spaces?
|
Author keywords
Anaesthesia obstetrical, Caesarean section; Anaesthesia, spinal, combined technique; Analgesia epidural, combined technique; Patient satisfaction
|
Indexed keywords
BUPIVACAINE;
DIAMORPHINE;
LIDOCAINE;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
BACKACHE;
BODY POSTURE;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMBINED EPIDURAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA;
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOUBLE SPACE TECHNIQUE;
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK SPACE;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
NEEDLE;
NEEDLE THROUGH NEEDLE;
OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA;
PAIN;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PERFORMANCE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
SPINAL ANESTHESIA;
VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;
ADULT;
ANESTHESIA, EPIDURAL;
ANESTHESIA, SPINAL;
ANESTHETICS, COMBINED;
BACK PAIN;
CESAREAN SECTION;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
NEEDLES;
ODDS RATIO;
PAIN;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
POSTURE;
PREGNANCY;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 13244266952
PISSN: 02650215
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021504000171 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (22)
|
References (6)
|