Towards increasing the utility of follow-up in Canadian EIA

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 163-180

  Noble, Bram ^a   Storey, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

EA follow up; Impact mitigation; Management; Predictive accuracy

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITY CONTROL; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CANADA; ECONOMIC BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA);

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; PROJECT ASSESSMENT;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 13244259610     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arts J. EIA follow-up: on the role of ex post evaluation in environmental impact assessment. 1998;Geo Press, Groningen
2. Arts J., Nooteboom S. Environmental impact assessment monitoring and auditing. Petts J. Handbook of environmental impact assessment. 1999;229-251 Blackwell, Oxford
3. Arts J., Caldwell P., Morrison-Saunders A. Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 19(3):2001;175-185
4. Bailey J., Hobbs V., Saunders A. Environmental auditing: artificial waterway developments in Western Australia. J. Environ. Manag. 34:2001;1-13
5. Baker J., Dobos R. Environmental assessment follow-up: A framework for Environment Canada. Paper presented at the International Association for Impact Assessment annual meeting, June, 2001, Cartagena, Colombia:2001
6. Bernard D., Hunsaker D.P. Jr., Marmorek D.R. Tools for improving predictive capabilities of environmental impact assessments: structured hypotheses, audits and monitoring. Hildebrand S.G., Cannon J.B. Environmental analysis: the NEPA experience. 2001;547-564 Lewis, Boca Raton (FL)
7. Bisset R. Problems and issues in the implementation of EIA audits. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 1:1980;379-396
8. Bisset R. Post-development audits to investigate the accuracy of environmental impact predictions. Z. Umweltpolit. 4(84):1984;463-484
9. Bisset R., Tomlinson P. Monitoring and auditing of impacts. Wathern P. Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. 1988;117-126 Unwin Hyman, London
10. Buckley R. Auditing the precision and accuracy of environmental impact predictions in Australia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 18:1991;1-23
11. Canada Monitoring/follow-up annotated bibliography. 1997;EA Enhancement and International Affairs Team, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Hull (Quebec)
12. Canada. Bill C-13, An Act to establish a federal environmental assessment process. Third Session, Thirty-fourth Parliament, 40-41 Elizabeth II, 1991-1992. Assented to 23rd June 1992. Queen's Printer, Ottawa, ON; 1992, updated 2003.
13. Canter L. Methods for environmental impact assessment: theory and application (emphasis on weighting-scaling checklists and networks). PADC Environmental Impact Assessment and Planning Unit Environmental impact assessment. 1983;Nijhoff, The Hague
14. Carley M.J. Cumulative socioeconomic monitoring: issues and indicators for Canada's Beaufort Region. 1984;Northern Economic Planning Branch, Indian and Northern Affairs, Ottawa (ON)
15. Culhane P.J., Friesema H.P., Beecher J.A. Forecasts and environmental decision-making, the content and predictive accuracy of environmental impact statements. 1987;Westview Press, Colorado
16. Curtis F., Epp H. Role of deductive science in evaluation of alternatives in environmental assessment. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 17(1):1999;3-8
17. Davenport J., Davenport J.A. The boom town: problems and promises in the energy vortex. 1980;University of Wyoming, Laramie
18. De Jongh P. Uncertainty in EIA. Wathern P. Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. 1988;Unwin Hyman, London
19. Denis R. Lessons derived from the environmental follow-up programs on the La Grande Riviere, downstream from the La Grande-2AQ generating station, James Bay, Quebec, Canada. Paper presented at the International Association for Impact Assessment annual meeting, June, 2000, Hong Kong:2000
20. Everitt R.R. Environmental effects monitoring manual. Report prepared for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and Environment Canada. 1991;ESSA Environmental and Social Systems Analysts, Vancouver (BC)
21. Frost R. EIA monitoring and audit. Weston J. Planning and environmental impact assessment in practice. 1993;141-164 Addison Wesley, London
22. Glasson J., Therivel R., Chadwick A. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. 2nd ed.:1999;UCL Press, London
23. IEMA Annual report 1999-2000. 2000;Independent Environmental Monitoring Agency, Yellowknife (NWT)
24. LGL The Hibernia GBS platform construction site marine environmental effects monitoring program: years 1-5. Report prepared for the Hibernia Management and Development Company. 1993-1997;LGL, St. John's (NF)
25. Locke J., Storey K. Socioeconomic assessment auditing: a Hibernia case study. Sinclair J. Canadian environmental assessment in transition. 1997;157-192 Canadian Association of Geographers Geography and Public Issues Committee, Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Publication Series, Waterloo (ON)
26. Macleod Institute Independent environmental monitoring agency evaluation report. 2000;Macleod Institute, Calgary (AB)
27. McCallum D.R. Follow-up to environmental impact assessment learning: learning from the Canadian Government experience. Environ. Monit. Assess. 8(3):1987;199-215
28. Mitchell B. Resource and environmental management. 2nd ed.:2002;Prentice-Hall, New York
29. Morrison-Saunders A., Bailey J. Exploring the EIA/environmental management relationship. Environ. Manag. 24(3):1999;281-295
30. Morrison-Saunders A., Baker J., Arts J. Lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 21(1):2003;43-56
31. Mulvihill P., Baker D. Ambitious and restrictive scoping: case studies from Northern Canada. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 21:2001;363-384
32. Murdock S.H., Leistritz F.L., Hamm R.R., Hwang S.S. An assessment of socio-economic assessments: utility, accuracy, and policy considerations. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 3:1982;333-350
33. Oilen R.M., Oilen D.D. Oil booms: social change in five Texas towns. 1982;University of Nebraska, Lincoln
34. Rabbit Lake Uranium Mine Environmental Assessment Panel Rabbit Lake uranium mining: A-zone, D-zone, Eagle Point. 1993;FEARO, Ottawa
35. Ross W.A. The independent environmental watchdog: a Canadian experiment in EIA follow-up. Paper presented at the Follow-up workshop at the annual meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 15-21 June 2002, The Hague, Netherlands:2002
36. Sadler B. Audit and evaluation in environmental assessment and management, Canadian and international experience. Proceedings of a conference 13-16 October, Banff. Ottawa. 1987;Environment Canada, ON
37. Senge P.M. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. 1994;Doubleday, New York
38. Storey K. Socio-economic effects monitoring: towards a more 'bio-physical' approach. Proceedings, IAIA follow-up workshop, annual conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, The Hague, Netherlands:2002
39. Storey K. From prediction to management: increasing the effectiveness of social impact assessment. Becker H.A., Porter A.L. Impact assessment today. vol. II:1986;539-551 Uitgeverij Jan van Arkel, Utrecht, Netherlands
40. Storey K., Jones P. Social impact assessment, impact management and follow-up: a case study of the construction of the Hibernia offshore platform. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 21(2):2003;99-107
41. Storey K., Durst D., Klein R., Shrimpton M. Monitoring for management: towards a process for managing the socio-economic impacts of offshore oil development in Newfoundland and Labrador. ISER offshore oil project monograph series. 1991;Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
42. Therivel R., Morris P. Introduction - methods for environmental components. Morris P., Therivel R. Methods of environmental impact assessment. 2nd ed.:2001;Spon press, New York
43. Tomlinson P., Atkinson S.F. Environmental audits, proposed terminology. Environ. Monit. Assess. 8:1987;187-198
44. Voisey's Bay Mine and Mill Environmental Assessment Panel Report on the proposed Voisey's Bay mine and mill project environmental assessment panel. 1999;Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Hull (PQ)
45. Wlodarczyk T.L. Improving monitoring and follow-up in Canadian environmental assessments. Paper presented at the International Association for Impact Assessment Annual Conference June 2000, Hong Kong:2000