A comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin cement and two orthodontic resin adhesive systems

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 109-113

  Vicente, Ascensión ^a   Bravo, Luis A ^a   Romero, Martín ^a   Ortiz, Antonio José ^a   Canteras, Manuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Orthodontic adhesives; Resin cements; Shear bond strength

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MACHINE; MEASUREMENT; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH; VELOCITY;

EID: 13244258454     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. García J, Kessler F. Adhesión. In: García, Barbero J, ed. Patología y terapeútica dental. Madrid: Síntesis; 1997:468-482.
2. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849-853.
3. Derrick R, Beech DR, Teherah J. Bonding of polymers to enamel: influence of deposits formed during etching, etching time and period of water immersion. J Dent Res. 1980;59:1156-1161.
4. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Adhesión a la estructura dentaria: comparación de los ionómeros de vidrio y los composites. J Esthet Dent. 1995;5:1-26.
5. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restoratives materials. J Dent Res. 1996;76:883-894.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Keogh T. Factores que influencian el Èxito clÌnico de la adhesión a la dentina y al esmalte (I). Maxilaris 1999;14:20-36.
7. Ireland AJ, Sherrif M. Use of an adhesive resin for bonding orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1994;1:27-34.
8. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:366-373.
9. Van Waes H, Matter T, Krejci I. Three dimensional measurement of enamel loss caused by bonding and debonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:666-669.
10. Canay S, Kocadereli I, Akca E. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:15-19.
11. Van Waveren WL, Feilzer AJ, Phrahl-Andersen B. The air abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: a quantification of surface enamel loss and comparison of shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:20-26.
12. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffon JF, Jacobsen JR. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin reinforced glass ionomer adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:288-294.
13. Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denys FR, Sadowsky PL. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:485-492.
14. International Organization for Standardization. ISO TR 11405 Dental Materials-guidance on Testing of Adhesion to Tooth Structure. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1994:1-13.
15. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
16. Rux W, Cooley RL, Hicks JL. Evaluation of phosphonate BIS-GMA resin as a bracket adhesive. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:57-60.
17. Lew KK, Neo JC, Chew CL. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using Panavia: an in vitro study. Clin Mater. 1993;12:89-93.
18. Chamda RA, Stein E. Time-related bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured bonding systems: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:378-82.
19. Olsen ME, Bishara SM, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air-abrasion of human enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:502-506.
20. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damond P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:80-87.
21. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:616-620.
22. Owen SE, Miller BH. A comparison of shear bond strengths of three visible light-cured adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:352-356.
23. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:621-624.
24. Shammaa I, Nang P, Kim H, et al. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:463-469.
25. Chung CH, Fadem BW, Levitt HL, Mante FK. Effects of two adhesion boosters on the shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:295-299.
26. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Othod. 1975;2:171-178.
27. Pickett KL, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, Lacafield W. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:141-148.
28. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Romeo A, De la Higuera B, Garcia Godoy FB. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:56-63.