Shape optimization of artificial hip prosthesis with 3D FEM;Shape optimization of artificial hip prosthesis with 3D FEM

Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering

Volumn 68, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 948-952

  Higa, Masaru ^a   Nishimura, Ikuya ^a   Tanino, Hiromasa ^a   Itoh, Hiroshi ^a   Matsuno, Takeo ^a   Mitamura, Yoshinori ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Computer Aided Design (CAD); Design Sensitivity Analysis (DSA); Finite Element Method (FEM); Shape Optimization; Static Stress Analysis; Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRESS ANALYSIS; STRESS CONCENTRATION;

DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS (DSA); SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; STATIC STRESS ANALYSIS;

HIP PROSTHESES;

EID: 13144256834     PISSN: 09120289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2493/jjspe.68.948     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. H. Malchau et. al.: Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden, Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica, 64, 5, (1993) 497.
2. I. Lee et. al.: Effects of variation of prosthesis size on cement stress at the tip a femoral implant, J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 28, (1994) 1055.
3. R. D. Crowninshield et. al.: An analysis of component stem design in total hip arthroplasty, J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Am) 62, 1, (1980) 68.
4. D. M. Estok II et. al.: Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component, J. Arthroplasty, 12, 1, (1997) 40.
5. K. A. Mann et. al.: Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond, J. Orthop. Res., 15, 5, (1997) 700.
6. D. O. O'Connor et. al.: In vitro measurement of strain in the cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair climbing, J. Orthop. Res., 14, 5, (1996) 769.
7. D. A. Fisher et. al.: Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total hip replacement, J. Biomechanics, 30, 11/12, (1997) 1173.
8. R. J. Yang et. al.: Design Sensitivity Analysis: A new method for implant design and a comparison with parametric finite element analysis, J. Biomechanics, 17, 10, (1984) 849.
9. Yang San Yoon et. al.: Shape optimal design of a cemented hip prosthesis to minimize stress concentration in the cement layer, J. Biomechanics, 22, 11/12, (1989) 1279.
10. M. Jasty et. al.: The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties, J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br) 73, 4, (1991) 551.
11. R. R. Salagame et. al.: Shape optimization with p adaptivity, AIAA Journal, 33, 12, Dec., (1995) 2399.
12. R. Huiskes and R. Boeklagen: Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design, J. Biomechanics, 22, 89, (1989) 793.
13. H. S. Hedia et. al.: A method for shape optimization of a hip prosthesis to maximize the fatigue life of the cement, Med. Eng. Phys. 18, 8, (1996) 647.
14. H. Katoozian et. al.: Three-dimensional shape optimization of femoral components of total hip prostheses, Bioengineering Conference ASME, BED, 24, (1993) 552.
15. P. Dvorac: So simple even an engineer can use it, Machine Design, 25, (1991) 73.
16. Nivbrant B. et. al.: Increased migration of the SHP prosthesis, Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica, 70, 6, (1999) 569.
17. W. Krause, et. al.: Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cements: Review of the literature, J. Biomed Mat. Res., 22, (1988) 37.