Irradiance and temperature affect the competitive interference of blackberry on the physiology of European beech seedlings

New Phytologist

Volumn 165, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 453-462

  Fotelli, Mariangela N ^a   Rudolph, Peter ^a   Rennenberg, Heinz ^a   Geßler, Arthur ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beech (Fagus sylvatica); Blackberry (Rubus fruticosus); Competition; Nitrogen status; Water status

Indexed keywords

WATER;

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); IRRADIANCE; SEEDLING; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; WATER STRESS;

ARTICLE; BEECH; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIGHT; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; ROSACEAE; SEEDLING; SOIL; SWEATING; TEMPERATURE; TIME;

FAGUS; LIGHT; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; ROSACEAE; SEEDLING; SOIL; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA; RUBUS; RUBUS FRUTICOSUS;

EID: 13144249240     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01255.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aranda I, Gil L, Pardos JA. 2004. Improvement of growth conditions and gas exchange of Fagus sylvatica L. seedlings planted below a recently thinned Pinus sylvestris L. stand. Trees 18: 211-220.
2. Aussenac G. 2000. Interactions between forest stands and microclimate. Ecophysiological aspects and consequences for silviculture. Annals of Forest Science 57: 287-301.
3. BassiriRad H. 2000. Kinetics of nutrient uptake by roots: Responses to global change. New Phytologist 147: 155-169.
4. Breda N, Granier A, Aussenac G. 1995. Effects of thinning on soil and tree water relations, transpiration and growth in an oak forest (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Tree Physiology 15: 295-306.
5. Coll L, Balandier P, Picon-Cochard C. 2004. Morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings to grass-induced belowground competition. Tree Physiology 24: 45-54.
6. Collet C, Lanter O, Pardos M. 2001. Effects of canopy opening on height and diameter growth in naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Annals of Forest Science 58: 127-134.
7. Craig H. 1957. Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 12: 133-149.
8. Dertz W. 1996. Buchenwälder im Zielkatalog der Forstwirtschaft. In: Buchenwälder - Ihr Schutz und Ihre Nutzung. Bonn, Germany: Stiftung Wald In Not, 2-8.
9. Ellenberg H. 1992. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Stuttgart, Germany: Eugen Ulmer.
10. Fotelli MN. 2002. Effects of climate and forest management on the water and nitrogen status of European beech regeneration and understorey vegetation. PhD Thesis. Albert-Ludwig University of Freiburg, Germany.
11. 13C composition. New Phytologist 151: 427-435.
12. Fotelli MN, Nahm M, Heidenfelder A, Papen H, Rennenberg H, Geßler A. 2002a. Soluble non-protein nitrogen compounds indicate changes in the nitrogen status of beech seedlings due to climate and thinning. New Phytologist 154: 85-97.
13. 15N uptake and partitioning, responses of amino acids and other N compounds. Plant Biology 4: 311-320.
14. Fotelli MN, Rennenberg H, Holst T, Mayer A, Gessler A. 2003. Carbon isotope composition of various tissues of beech (Fagus sylvatica) regeneration is indicative of recent environmental conditions within the forest understorey. New Phytologist 159: 229-244.
15. 15N-uptake, N balance and biomass of European beech seedlings. Trees 18: 157-166.
16. Geßler A, Keitel C, Nahm M, Rennenberg H. 2004. Effects of water shortage on water and nitrogen balance in Central European beech forests. Plant Biology 6: 289-298.
17. Geßler A, Kreuzwieser J, Dopatka T, Rennenberg H. 2002. Diurnal courses of ammonium net uptake by the roots of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies) trees. Plant and Soil 240: 23-32.
18. Geßler A, Schneider S, von Sengbusch D, Weber P, Hanemann U, Huber C, Rothe A, Kreutzer K, Rennenberg H. 1998. Field and laboratory experiments on net uptake of nitrate and ammonium by the roots of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees. New Phytologist 138: 275-285.
19. Geßler A, Schrempp S, Matzarakis A, Meyer H, Rennenberg H, Adams MA. 2001. Carbon isotope composition of phloem sap, wood and foliage of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). effects of water availability and radiation during the growing season. New Phytologist 150: 653-664.
20. IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1000.
21. Keitel C, Adams MA, Holst T, Matzarakis A, Mayer H, Rennenberg H, Geßler A. 2003. Carbon and oxygen isotope composition of organic compounds in the phloem sap provides a short-term measure for stomatal conductance of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Plant, Cell and Environment 26: 1157-1168.
22. - transport processes of non-mycorrhizal Fagus sylvatica roots. Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 1431-1438.
23. + influx in spruce. Plant Physiology 110: 773-779.
24. Llorens L, Peñuelas J, Estiarte M. 2003. Ecophysiological responses of two Mediterranean shrubs, Erica multiflora and Globularia alypum, to experimentally drier and warmer conditions. Physiologia Plantarum 119: 231-243.
25. Loik ME, Redar SP, Harte J. 2000. Photosynthetic responses to a climate-warming manipulation for contrasting meadow species in the Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USA. Functional Ecology 14: 166-175.
26. Madsen P, Larsen JB. 1997. Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content. Forest Ecology and Management 97: 95-105.
27. Millard P, Proe MF. 1992. Storage and internal cycling of nitrogen in relation to seasonal growth of Sitka spruce. Tree Physiology 10: 33-43.
28. Millard P, Proe MF. 1993. Nitrogen uptake, partitioning and internal cycling in Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. as influenced by nittogen supply. New Phytologist 125: 113-119.
29. Ministerium für Ländlichen Raum, Ernährung Landwirschaft und Forsten in Baden-Württenberg (ed. and publisher.). 1999. Richtlinien Landesweiter Waldentwicklungstypen. Stuttgart, Germany.
30. Mizunaga H. 2000. Prediction of PPFD variance at forest floor in a thinned Japanese cypress plantation. Forest Ecology and Management 126: 309-319.
31. Peuke AD, Schraml C, Hartung W, Rennenberg H. 2002. Identification of drought-sensitive beech ecotypes by physiological parameters. New Phytologist 154: 373-387.
32. Plassard C, Scheromm P, Mousain D, Salsac L. 1991. Assimilation of mineral nitrogen and ion balance in the two partners of ectomyccorhizal symbiosis, data and hypothesis. Experimentia 47: 340-349.
33. Saxe H, Cannell MGR, Johnsen O, Ryan MG, Vourlitis G. 2001. Tansley review, 123. Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. New Phytologist 149: 369-400.
34. Starr G, Oberbauer SF, Pop EW. 2000. Effects of lengthened growing season and soil warming on the phenology and physiology of Polygonum bistoria. Global Change Biology 6: 357-369.
35. Tarp P, Helles F, Holten-Andersen P, Larsen JB, Strange N. 2000. Modeling near-natural silvicultural regimes for beech - an economic sensitivity analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 130: 187-198.
36. Thibodeau L, Raymond P, Camire C, Munson A. 2000. Impact of precommercial thinning in balsam fir stands on soil N dynamics, microbial biomass, decomposition, and foliar nutrition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 229-238.
37. Tognetti R, Minolta G, Pinzauti S, Michelozzi M, Borghetti M. 1998. Acclimation to changing light conditions of long-term shade-grown beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings of different geographic origins. Trees 12: 326-333.
38. Valladares F, Chico JM, Aranda I, Balaguer L, Dizengremel P, Manrique E, Dreyer E. 2002. The greater seedling high-light tolerance of Quercus robur over Fagus sylvatica is linked to a greater physiological plasticity. Trees 16: 395-403.
39. Welander NT, Ottosson B. 1998. The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. & Fagus sylvatica L. Forest Ecology and Management 107: 117-126.