Schizophrenia: Is it time to replace the term?

Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 335-341

  Ono, Yutaka ^a   Satsumi, Yuki ^a   Kim, Yoshiharu ^a   Iwadate, Toshiharu ^a   Moriyama, Kimio ^a   Nakane, Yoshibumi ^a   Nakata, Teruo ^a   Okagami, Kazuo ^a   Sakai, Toshiaki ^a   Sato, Mitsumoto ^a   Someya, Toshiyuki ^a   Takagi, Shunsuke ^a   Ushijima, Sadanobu ^a   Yamauchi, Keita ^b   Yoshimura, Kimio ^c  

^a Wing Building 52   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL CANCER CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diagnostic term; Informed consent; Schizophrenia; Stigma; Tree analysis

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NOMENCLATURE; PSYCHIATRIST; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SCHIZOPHRENIA;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION TREES; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; JAPAN; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PUBLIC OPINION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 13044311399     PISSN: 13231316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.1999.00555.x     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Kraepelin E. Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia. Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1896.
2. Bleuler E. Dementia praecox order Gruppe der Schizophrenien. Handbuch der Psychiatrie. (hrsg. Aschaffenburg). Spezieller Teil 4 Abteilung, 1 H fte. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig/Wein. 1911.
3. Cooper JE, Kendell RE, Gurland BJ, Sharpe L, Copeland JRM, Simon R. Psychiatric Diagnosis in New York and London. Oxford University Press, London, 1972.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Press. Washington DC, 1994.
5. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision. WHO, Geneva, 1993.
6. Hegaty JD, Baldessarini RJ, Tohen M, Waternaux C, Oepen G. One hundred years of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of the outcome literature. Am. J. Psychiatry 1994; 151: 1409-1416.
7. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen R, Stone CJ. Classification and Regression Trees. Wardsworth International Group, Belmont, 1984.
8. Magidson J. SPSS for Windows: CHAID, Release 6.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, 1993.
9. Yamauchi K. General theory and application of the tree-based model analysis to health care research. J. Jpn. Soc. Hospital Admin 33: 255-265 (in Japanese).
10. Klerman G. The psychiatric patient's right to effective treatment: implications of Osheroff v Chestnut Lodge. Am. J. Psychiatry 1990; 147: 409-418.
11. Andreasen NC. Changing concepts of schizophrenia and the ahistorical fallacy. Am. J. Psychiatry 1994; 150: 1405-1406.
12. Green RS, Ganter AB. Telling patients and families the psychiatric diagnosis: a survey of psychiatrists. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 1987; 38: 666-668.
13. Koishikawa H, Kim Y, Yuzawa C, Iwasaki S, Mizukawa R, Ikegami K. Investigation of the consciousness of the patients and the families about the given information of the disease. In: Uchimura, H (ed.), Studies on clincial features, treatment, and rehabilitation of schizophrenia: final report of the national project team. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan. 1997 (abstract in Japanese).
14. Roth LH, Meisel A, Lidz CW. Tests of competency to consent to treatment. Am. J. Psychiatry 1977; 134: 279-284.
15. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH. Clinical issues in the assessment of competency. Am. J. Psychiatry 1981; 138: 1462-1467.
16. Takagi S, Yoshida R. Informed consent and competency in psychiatry - from a clinical point of view. Psychiatrica et Neurologica Japonica 1993; 95: 891-898 (in Japanese).
17. Schachter D, Kleinman I, Prendergast P, Remington G, Schertzer S. The effect of psychopathology on the ability of schizophrenic patients to give informed consent. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1994; 182: 360-362.