Charge-independence breaking in the two-pion-exchange nucleon-nucleon force

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 340061-340064

  Friar, J L ^a   Van Kolck, U ^b  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13044270983     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.60.034006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. [1] E. M. Henley, in Isospin in Nuclear Physics, edited by D. H. Wilkinson (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969), p. 15; E. M. Henley and G. A. Miller, in Mesons and Nuclei, edited by M. Rho and G. E. Brown (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), Vol. I, p. 405.
2. [1] E. M. Henley, in Isospin in Nuclear Physics, edited by D. H. Wilkinson (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969), p. 15; E. M. Henley and G. A. Miller, in Mesons and Nuclei, edited by M. Rho and G. E. Brown (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), Vol. I, p. 405.
3. [2] G. A. Miller, B. M. K. Nefkens, and I. Šlaus, Phys. Rep. 194, 1 (1990); G. A. Miller and W. T. H. van Oers, in Symmetries and Fundamental Interactions in Nuclei, edited by W. Haxton and E. M. Henley (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).
4. [2] G. A. Miller, B. M. K. Nefkens, and I. Šlaus, Phys. Rep. 194, 1 (1990); G. A. Miller and W. T. H. van Oers, in Symmetries and Fundamental Interactions in Nuclei, edited by W. Haxton and E. M. Henley (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).
5. [3] S. A. Coon, nucl-th/9903033, invited talk given at XIIIth International Seminar on High Energy Physics Problems (ISHEPP 13), "Relativistic Nuclear Physics and Quantum Chromodynamics," Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia, 1996.
6. [4] S. Weinberg, Physica A 96, 327 (1979); S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B363, 3 (1991); Phys. Lett. B 251, 288 (1990); 295, 114 (1992).
7. [4] S. Weinberg, Physica A 96, 327 (1979); S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B363, 3 (1991); Phys. Lett. B 251, 288 (1990); 295, 114 (1992).
8. [4] S. Weinberg, Physica A 96, 327 (1979); S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B363, 3 (1991); Phys. Lett. B 251, 288 (1990); 295, 114 (1992).
9. [4] S. Weinberg, Physica A 96, 327 (1979); S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B363, 3 (1991); Phys. Lett. B 251, 288 (1990); 295, 114 (1992).
10. [5] U. van Kolck, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, 1993; U. van Kolck, Few-Body Syst., Suppl. 9, 444 (1995).
11. [5] U. van Kolck, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, 1993; U. van Kolck, Few-Body Syst., Suppl. 9, 444 (1995).
12. [6] C. Ordóñez and U. van Kolck, Phys. Lett. B 291, 459 (1992); C. Ordóñez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1982 (1994); U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2932 (1994); C. Ordonez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, ibid. 53, 2086 (1996). This reference uses the Brueckner-Watson off-shell extension of the one-pion-exchange potential (see Ref. [19] for a complete historical discussion), which is an energy-dependent potential. Such a form leads to a different two-pion-exchange potential than that produced by the more usual energy-independent form of OPEP. In this paper we use the energy-independent form, as did Refs. [17-22].
13. [6] C. Ordóñez and U. van Kolck, Phys. Lett. B 291, 459 (1992); C. Ordóñez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1982 (1994); U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2932 (1994); C. Ordonez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, ibid. 53, 2086 (1996). This reference uses the Brueckner-Watson off-shell extension of the one-pion-exchange potential (see Ref. [19] for a complete historical discussion), which is an energy-dependent potential. Such a form leads to a different two-pion-exchange potential than that produced by the more usual energy-independent form of OPEP. In this paper we use the energy-independent form, as did Refs. [17-22].
14. [6] C. Ordóñez and U. van Kolck, Phys. Lett. B 291, 459 (1992); C. Ordóñez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1982 (1994); U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2932 (1994); C. Ordonez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, ibid. 53, 2086 (1996). This reference uses the Brueckner-Watson off-shell extension of the one-pion-exchange potential (see Ref. [19] for a complete historical discussion), which is an energy-dependent potential. Such a form leads to a different two-pion-exchange potential than that produced by the more usual energy-independent form of OPEP. In this paper we use the energy-independent form, as did Refs. [17-22].
15. [6] C. Ordóñez and U. van Kolck, Phys. Lett. B 291, 459 (1992); C. Ordóñez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1982 (1994); U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2932 (1994); C. Ordonez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, ibid. 53, 2086 (1996). This reference uses the Brueckner-Watson off-shell extension of the one-pion-exchange potential (see Ref. [19] for a complete historical discussion), which is an energy-dependent potential. Such a form leads to a different two-pion-exchange potential than that produced by the more usual energy-independent form of OPEP. In this paper we use the energy-independent form, as did Refs. [17-22].
16. [7] V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U.-G. Meißner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 4, 193 (1995) is a comprehensive current review.
17. [8] A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984); H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 298, 187 (1993).
18. [8] A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984); H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 298, 187 (1993).
19. [9] J. L. Friar, Few-Body Syst. 22, 161 (1997).
20. [10] U. van Kolck, M. C. M. Rentmeester, J. L. Friar, T. Goldman, and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4386 (1998).
21. [11] U. van Kolck, J. L. Friar, and T. Goldman, Phys. Lett. B 371, 169 (1996).
22. [12] L. K. Morrison, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 50, 6 (1968).
23. [13] G. Q. Li and R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 58, 3153 (1998).
24. [14] E. M. Henley and L. K. Morrison, Phys. Rev. 141, 1489 (1966). This reference also incorporated different coupling constants for charged and neutral pions.
25. [15] R. G. E. Timmermans (private communication). This is presently being done in the new Nijmegen analysis of np scattering. The pp results are given in Ref. [23].
26. [16] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 616 (1966); Y. Tomozawa. Nuovo Cimento A 46, 707 (1966).
27. [16] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 616 (1966); Y. Tomozawa. Nuovo Cimento A 46, 707 (1966).
28. [17] M. Taketani, S. Machida, and S. Ohnuma, Prog. Theor. Phys. 7, 45 (1952). There are typographical errors in TMO that are corrected in, S. Machida, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 39, 91 (1967).
29. [17] M. Taketani, S. Machida, and S. Ohnuma, Prog. Theor. Phys. 7, 45 (1952). There are typographical errors in TMO that are corrected in, S. Machida, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 39, 91 (1967).
30. [18] M. Sugawara and S. Okubo, Phys. Rev. 117, 605 (1960); 117, 611 (1960).
31. [18] M. Sugawara and S. Okubo, Phys. Rev. 117, 605 (1960); 117, 611 (1960).
32. [19] J. L. Friar and S. A. Coon, Phys. Rev. C 49, 1272 (1994). Equations (2a)-(2c) of the present paper follow from Eqs. (A14), (A21), and (A23) of this reference after the derivatives are evaluated and various Bessel function identities are used, or they can be taken directly from Refs. [20, 21, 23].
33. [20] N. Kaiser, R. Brockmann, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A625, 758 (1997).
34. [21] E. Epelbaoum, W. Glöckle, and U.-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A637, 107 (1998).
35. [22] J. L. Friar, nucl-th/9901082. This paper calculates the subleading-order TPEP for a variety of off-shell extensions of OPEP. The forces due to the dominant counter-term seagulls are not affected by such considerations.
36. [23] M. C. M. Rentmeester, R. G. E. Timmermans, J. L. Friar, and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4992 (1999).
37. [24] S. A. Coon and M. D. Scadron, Phys. Rev. C 26, 2402 (1982).
38. [25] R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).
39. [26] T. E. O. Ericson and G. A. Miller, Phys. Lett. 132B, 32 (1983).
40. [27] M. H. Partovi and E. L. Lomon, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1999 (1970).