Mapping the brain's orchestration during speech comprehension: Task-specific facilitation of regional synchrony in neural networks

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 5, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Härle, Markus ^a   Rockstroh, Brigitte S ^a   Keil, Andreas ^a   Wienbruch, Christian ^a   Elbert, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CALCULATION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; DIPOLE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FACILITATION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATION; PHONEME; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SOUND TRANSMISSION; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HISTOLOGY; LANGUAGE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE NET; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 12944331144     PISSN: 14712202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-5-40     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hebb DO: The organization of behavior; a neuropsychological theory. Wiley, New York; 1949.
2. Singer W: Search for coherence: A basic principle of cortical self-organization. Concepts Neurosci 1990, 1: -26.
3. Singer W: Development and plasticity of cortical processing architectures. Science 1995, 270:758-764.
4. Löwel S, Singer W: Experience-dependent plasticity of intracortical connections. In In Perceptual Learning Edited by: Fahle M, Poggio T. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002:3-18.
5. Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Jung TP, Courchesne E, Seijnowski TJ: Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention. J Neurosci 1999, 19:2665-2680.
6. Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Enghoff S, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Seijnowski TJ: Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science 2002, 295:690-93.
7. Makeig S, Delorme A, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ: Electroencephalographic brain dynamics following manually responded visual targets. PLS Biol 2004, 2:747-762.
8. Singer W: Neural Synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 1999, 24:29-65.
9. Valera F, Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J: The brainweb: Phase synchronisation and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2:229-238.
10. Elbert T, Keil A: Imaging in the fourth dimension. Nature 2000, 404:29-30.
11. Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff PJ: A 40 Hz potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1981, 78: 643-2647.
12. Patel AD, Balaban E: Temporal patterns of human cortical activity reflect tone sequence structure. Nature 2000, 404: 0-84.
13. Srinivasan R, Russell DP, Edelman GM, Tononi G: Increased synchronisation of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19:5435-5448.
14. Weiss S, Rappelsberger P: EEG coherence within the 13-18 Hz band as a correlate of distinct lexical organisation of concrete and abstract nouns in humans. Neuroscience Letters 1996, 209: 7-20.
15. Weiss S, Rappelsberger P: Long-range EEG-synchronisation during word encoding correlates with successful memory performance. Cognitive Brain Research 2000, 9:299-312.
16. Bhattacharya J, Petsche H, Perda E: Long-range synchrony in the gamma band: Role in music perception. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:6329-6337.
17. Gaetz M, Weinberg H., Rzempoluck E, Jantzen KJ: Neural network classifications and correlation analysis of EEG and MEG activity accompanying spontaneous reversals of the Necker cube. Cogn Brain Res 1998, 6:335-346.
18. Miltner WHR, Braun C, Arnold M, Witte H, Taub E: Coherence of γ-EEG activity as a basis of associative learning. Nature 1999, 397:434-436.
19. Newman AJ, Pancheva R, Ozawa K, Neville HJ, Ullman MT: An event-related fMRI study of syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2001, 30:339-364.
20. Binder J: The new neuroanatomy of speech perception. Brain 2000, 123(Pt 12):2371-2372.
21. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Rao SM, Cox RW: Function of the left planum temporale in auditory and linguistic processing. Brain 1996, 119:1239-1247.
22. Demb JB, Desmond JE, Wagner AD, Vaidya CJ: Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: A functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:5870-5878.
23. Demonet JF, Chollet F, Ramsay S, Cardebat D, Nespoulous JL, Wise R, Rascol A, Frackowiak R: The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain 1992, 115: 753-1768.
24. Hichok G, Poeppel D: Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2000, 4:131-138.
25. Pulvermüller F, Preissel H, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N: Brain rhythms of language: Nouns vs verbs. European Journal of Neuroscience 1996, 8:937-941.
26. Scott SK, Blank CC, Rosen S, Wise RJS: Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123:2400-2406.
27. Hahne A, Jescheniak JD: What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 11:199-212.
28. Zatorre RJ, Evans AC, Meyer E: Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch. Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 14:1908-1919.
29. Zatorre RJ, Belin P, Penhune VB: Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn Sci 2002, 6: 7-46.
30. Liegeois-Chauvel C, Peretz I, Babai M, Laguitton V, Chauvral P: Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing. Brain 1998, 121:1853-1867.
31. Evers S, Dannert J, Rödding D, Rötter G, Ringelstein EB: The cerebral haemodynamics of music perception. A transcranial Doppler sonography study. Brain 1999, 122(Pt 1):75-85.
32. Oldfield RC: The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:157-200.
33. Kohler KJ: The disappearance of words in connected speech. ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics 1998, 11:21-34.
34. Hämäläinen M, Ilmoniemi RJ: Interpreting Measured Magnetic Fields of the Brain: Estimates of Current Distributions. Technical Report TKK-F-A559 HUT Finland 1984.
35. Hauk O, Berg P, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh B, Elbert T: The minimum norm method as an effective mapping tool for MEG analysis. In In Recent Advances in Biomagnetism Edited by: Yoshimoto T, Kotani M, Kuriki M, Karibe H, Nakasato N. Tohoku University Press; 1999:213-216.
36. Hauk O, Keil A, Elbert T, Müller MM: Comparison of data transformation procedures to enhance topographical accuracy in time-series analysis of the human EEG. J Neurosci Methods 2002, 113:111-112.
37. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Hauk O, Gonzalez Andino S, Vogt H, Michel C: Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography. Human Brain Mapping 1997, 5:454-467.
38. Proakis JG, Manolakis DG: Digital signal processing: Principles, algorithms, and applications. 3rd edition. London: Prentice-Hall .
39. Knosche TR, Maess B, Friederici AD: Processing of syntactic information monitored by brain surface current density mapping based on MEG. Brain Topogr 1999, 12:75-87.