Nuclear octupole correlations and the enhancement of atomic time-reversal violation

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 355021-3550213

  Engel, J ^a   Friar, J L ^b   Hayes, A C ^b  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12944300327     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.61.035502     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Robert G. Sachs, The Physics of Time Reversal (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987).
2. A. Angelopoulos et al., Phys. Lett. B 444, 43 (1998).
3. I.B. Khriplovich and S.K. Lamoreaux, CP Violation Without Strangeness: Electric Dipole Moments of Particles, Atoms, and Molecules (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997).
4. W.C. Haxton and E.M. Henley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1937 (1983).
5. N. Auerbach, V.V. Flambaum, and V. Spevak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4316 (1996).
6. V. Spevak, N. Auerbach, and V. V. Flambaum, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1357 (1997).
7. I.B. Khriplovich, Parity Nonconservation in Atomic Phenomena (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1991).
8. O.P. Sushkov, V.V. Flambaum, and I.B. Khriplovich, Zh. Exp. Teor. Fiz. 87, 1521 (1984) [Sov. Phys. JETP 60, 873 (1984)].
9. O.P. Sushkov, V.V. Flambaum, and I.B. Khriplovich, Zh. Exp. Teor. Fiz. 87, 1521 (1984) [Sov. Phys. JETP 60, 873 (1984)].
10. R.P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 56, 340 (1939); H. Hellmann, Einfuhrung in die Quantumchemie (Franz Deuticke, Leipzig, 1937), p. 285. The usual statement of the theorem is that if a Hamiltonian H(λ) depends on a parameter λ, the energy shift E(λ) for that Hamiltonian satisfies ∂E(λ)/∂λ = 〈ψ(λ)|∂H(λ)/∂λ|ψ(λ)〉. If one performs a unitary transformation so that H(λ) = exp(iλU)H(0)exp(-iλU), uses the theorem and then sets λ to zero, one finds ∂E(0)/∂λ ≡ 0 = i〈[U,H(0)]〉, since there can be no energy shift from a unitary transformation. Our quantity Δ in Eqs. (6) and (21) is given by this relationship.
11. R.P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 56, 340 (1939); H. Hellmann, Einfuhrung in die Quantumchemie (Franz Deuticke, Leipzig, 1937), p. 285. The usual statement of the theorem is that if a Hamiltonian H(λ) depends on a parameter λ, the energy shift E(λ) for that Hamiltonian satisfies ∂E(λ)/∂λ = 〈ψ(λ)|∂H(λ)/∂λ|ψ(λ)〉. If one performs a unitary transformation so that H(λ) = exp(iλU)H(0)exp(-iλU), uses the theorem and then sets λ to zero, one finds ∂E(0)/∂λ ≡ 0 = i〈[U,H(0)]〉, since there can be no energy shift from a unitary transformation. Our quantity Δ in Eqs. (6) and (21) is given by this relationship.
12. V. Fock, Z. Phys. 63, 855 (1930).
13. E. M. Purcell and N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 78, 807 (1950).
14. L.I. Schiff, Phys. Rev. 132, 2194 (1963).
15. J.L. Friar, Few-Body Systems 22, 161 (1997).
16. S.T. Epstein and J.O. Hirschfelder, Phys. Rev. 123, 1495 (1961).
17. J.L. Friar and S. Fallieros, Phys. Lett. 114B, 403 (1982). Although no consensus notation for retarded electric multipoles exists, we adopt the nomenclature of this reference, which has seen considerable use.
18. J. Goldemberg, Y. Torizuka, W.C. Barber, and J.D. Walecka, Nucl. Phys. 43, 242 (1963).
19. 0. This simple modification accounts for all vacuum fluctuations in the GT model.
20. D.M. Brink, Nucl. Phys. 4, 215 (1957).
21. A. Arima, P. Manakos, and D. Strottman, Phys. Lett. 60B, 1 (1975).
22. D. Agassi, V. Gillet, and A. Lumbroso, Nucl. Phys. A144, 161 (1970).
23. D.J. Millener, A.C. Hayes, and D. Strottman, Phys. Rev. C 45, 473 (1992).
24. Malcolm Harvey, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 1, 67 (1968).
25. P.A. Butler and W. Nazarewicz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 349 (1996).
26. I.S. Towner and A.C. Hayes, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2391 (1994).
27. A. Griffiths and P. Vogel, Phys. Rev. C 43, 2844 (1991).
28. P. Herczeg, Hyperfine Interact. 43, 77 (1988).
29. A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (Benjamin, New York, 1975), Vol. 2.
30. G.A. Leander, W. Nazarewicz, G.F. Bertsch, and J. Dudek, Nucl. Phys. A453, 58 (1986).
31. J.L. Egido and L.M. Robledo, Nucl. Phys. A545, 589 (1992), and references therein.
32. V. Martín and L.M. Robledo, Phys. Rev. C 49, 188 (1994); 50, 520 (1994).
33. V. Martín and L.M. Robledo, Phys. Rev. C 49, 188 (1994); 50, 520 (1994).
34. J.L. Egido (private communication).
35. R.H. Spear, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 42, 55 (1989).
36. G.A. Leander and R.K. Sheline, Nucl. Phys. A413, 375 (1991).
37. P. Moller et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995).
38. V.V. Flambaum, I.B. Khriplovich, and O.P. Sushkov, Nucl. Phys. A449, 750 (1986).