Universal ethical principles in a diverse universe: A commentary on Monshi and Zieglmayer's case study

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 313-319

  DuBois, James M ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Institutional review boards; International research; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 12944268234     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb1404_3     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. American Psychological Association. (1953). Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington. DC: Author.
2. Annas, G. J., & Grodin, M. A. (Eds.). (1992). The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Boruch, R. F., & Cecil, J. S. (1979). Assuring the confidentiality of social research data. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5. DuBois, J. M. (2002). When is informed consent appropriate in educational research? Ethical and regulatory issues, IRB. Ethics & Human Research. 24, 1-8.
6. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. 45 C.F.R. § 46 (2001). Retrieved November 9, 2004, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
7. Laufer, R. S., & Wolfe, M. (1977). Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional developmental theory. Journal of Social Issues. 33(3), 22-42.
8. Monshi, B., & Zieglmayer, V. (2003). Die medikale kultur Sri Lankas: Ayurveda, Buddhistische heilmethoden und die Westliche Schulmedizin. Ein beitrug zur transkulturellen psychologie [The medical culture of Sri Lanka: Ayurveda, Buddhist healing and Western medicine: A contribution to cross-cultural psychology], Triesen, Liechtenstein: Universitätsverlag Liechtenstein.
9. Monshi, B., & Zieglmayer, V. (2004/this issue). The problem of privacy in transcultural research: Reflections on an ethnographic study in Sri Lanka. Ethics & Behavior, 14, 305-312.
10. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (DHEW Publication No. [OS] 78-0012). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://206.102.88.10/nihtraining/ohsrsite/guidelines/belmont.html
11. Office of Human Research Protections. (1993). Protecting human research subjects: Institutional review hoard guidebook. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/irb_guidebook.htm
12. Reverby, S. (Ed.). (2000). Tuskegee's truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
13. Sieber, J. E. (1992). Planning ethically responsible research. A guide for students and internal review boards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Sieber, J. E. (2001). Privacy and confidentiality as related to human research in social and behavioral science. In N. B. A. Commission (Ed.), Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants. Volume II commissioned papers and staff analysis (pp. NI-N50). Bethesda. MD: National Bioethics Advisory Committee.
15. World Medical Association. (2000). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Edinburgh, Scotland: Author.