Applying conjoint analysis in economic evaluations: An application to menorrhagia

Applied Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 823-833

  Miguel, Fernando San ^a   Ryan, Mandy ^a   McIntosh, Emma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE;

EID: 12944260710     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/000368400322165     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Acito, F. (1977) An investigation of some data collection issues in conjoint measurement, in Contemporary Marketing Thought, Proceedings of American Marketing Association.
2. Acito, F. and Jain, A. K. (1980) Evaluation of conjoint analysis results: a comparison of methods, Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 106-12.
3. Bohm, P. (1972) Estimating demand for public goods: an experiment, European Economic Review, 3, 111-30.
4. Bradley, M. (1991) User's manual for the speed version 2.1 stated preference experiment editor and designer, Hague Consulting Group, Hague.
5. Bryan, B., Buxton, M., Sheldon, R. and Grant, A. (1997) The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the investigation of knee injuries: a discrete choice conjoint analysis exercise. Presented at the Health Economists' Study Group Meeting, University of York.
6. Cameron, I. M., Mollison, J., Pinion, S. B., Atherton-Naji, A., Buckingham, K. and Torgerson, D. (1996) A cost comparison of hysterectomy and hysteroscopic surgery for the treatment of menorrhagia, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology, 70, 87-92.
7. Coulter, A., Kelland, J., Long, A., Melville, A., O'Meara, S., Schulper, M., Sheldon, T. and Song, F. (1995) The management of menorrhagia. What are the effective ways of treating excessive regular menstrual blood loss in primary and secondary care? Effective Health Care, 9, 2-14.
8. Donaldson, C. and Shackley, P. (1997) Does process utility exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Social Science and Medicine, 44, 699-707.
9. Donaldson, C., Shackley, P., Abdalla, M. and Miedzybrodzka, Z. (1995) Willingness to pay for antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, Health Economics, 4, 439-52.
10. Donaldson, C., Shackley, P. and Abdalla, M. (1997) Using willingness to pay to value close substitutes: carrier screening for cystic fibrosis revisited, Health Economics, 6, 145-59.
11. Drakopoulos, S. A. (1991) Hierarchical behaviour in economics, discussion paper 91-07, Department of Economics, University of Aberdeen.
12. Drakopoulos, S. A. (1991b) Threshold based demand and product market clearing, discussion paper 91-10, Department of Economics, University of Aberdeen.
13. Farrar, S. and Ryan, M. (1997) Prioritisation of clinical service developments in a teaching hospital: an application of conjoint analysis, Health Economics Research Unit Discussion Paper No. 08/97, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
14. Fowkes, T. and Wardman, M. (1988) The design of stated preference travel choice experiments. With special reference to interpersonal taste variation, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 27-44.
15. Gath, D., Osborn, M. and Bungay, G. (1987) Psychiatric disorder and gynaecological symptoms in middle aged women: a community survey, British Medical Journal, 294, 213-18.
16. Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice, Journal of Marketing Research, 54, 3-19.
17. Hanemann, W. (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses: reply, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2-341.
18. Hensher, D. A. (1994) Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice, Transportation, 21, 107-33.
19. Kind, P. (1988) The design and construction of quality of life measures, Discussion Paper No 43, University of York, York.
20. Lancaster, K. (1966) A new approach to consumer theory, Journal of Political Economy, 74, 134-57.
21. Lancaster, K. (1971) Consumer Demand, Columbia University Press, New York.
22. Louviere, J. L. (1988) Conjoint analysis modelling of stated preferences. A review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 93-119.
23. Luce, R. D. and Tukey, J. W. (1964) Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.
24. McFadden, D. (1973) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour, University of California at Berkeley, California.
25. O'Brien, B. and Gafni, A. (1996) When do the 'dollars' make sense? Towards a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care, Medical Decision Making, 16, 288-99.
26. Olsen, J. A. and Donaldson, C. (1998) Helicopters, hearts and hips: using willingness to pay to set priorities for public sector health care programme, Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1-12.
27. Pinion, S. B., Parkin, D. E., Abramovich, D. R., Naki, A., Alexander, D., Russell, I. T. and Kitchener, H. C. (1994) Randomised trial of hysterectomy, endometrial laser ablation and transcervical endometrial resection for dysfunctional uterine bleeding, British Medical Journal, 309, 979-83.
28. Posavac, S. (1998) Strategic overbidding in contingent valuation: stated economic value of public goods varies according to consumers expectations of funding source, Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 205-14.
29. Propper, C. (1990) Contingent valuation of time spent on NHS waiting lists, The Economic Journal, 100, 193-99.
30. Propper, C. (1995) The disutility of time spent on the United Kingdom's National Health Service waiting lists, The Journal of Human Resources, 30, 677-700.
31. Ryan, M. and Farrar, S. (1995) Conjoint analysis: a new tool for eliciting patients' preferences. Briefing paper for the NHS in Scotland No. 6, Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.
32. Ryan, M. (1995) Economics and the patient's utility function: an application to assisted reproductive techniques, PhD Thesis, Aberdeen, University of Aberdeen.
33. Ryan, M. (1996) Establishing the convergent validity of willingness to pay and conjoint analysis for eliciting preferences, paper presented to the Health Economists' Study Group meeting, University of Brunel.
34. Ryan, M. and Hughes, J. (1997) Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management, Health Economics, 6, 261-73.
35. Ryan, M., Ratcliffe, J. and Tucker, J. (1997) Using willingness to pay to value alternative models of antenatal care, Social Science and Medicine, 44, 371-80.
36. San Miguel, F., Ryan, M. and McIntosh, E. (1997) Establishing women's preferences for the treatment of menorrhagia using the technique of conjoint analysis, Health Economics Research Unit Discussion Paper No. 06/97, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
37. Scott, A. (1998) Giving things up to have more of others. The implications of limited substitutability for eliciting preferences in health and health care, presented at the Health Economists' Study Group Meeting, University of Sheffield, January.
38. Sculpher, M. J., Bryan, S., Dwyer, N., Hutton, J. and Stirrat, G. M. (1993) An economic evaluation of transcervical endometrial resection versus abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 100, 244-52.
39. Sculpher, M. J., Dwyer, N. and Stirrat, G. M. (1996) Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection: effect on health related quality of life and costs two years after surgery, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 103, 142-9.
40. Sheldon, R. J. and Steer, J. K. (1982) the use of conjoint analysis in transport research, Transport Research, 145-58.
41. Torrance, G. (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review, Journal of Health Economics, 5, 1-30.
42. van der Pol, M. and Cairns, J. (1998) Establishing patient preferences for blood transfusion support: an application of conjoint analysis, Journal Health Services Research and Management, 3, 70-6.
43. Vick, S. and Scott, A. (1998) Agency in health care: examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship, Journal of Health Economics, 17, 587-606.
44. Wardman, M. (1988) A comparison of revealed preference and stated preference models, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 71-91.
45. Williams, A. (1985) Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting, British Medical Journal, 1, 326-29.