A useful dialogue? Habermas and international relations

Review of International Studies

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 127-140

  Diez, Thomas ^a   Steans, Jill ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12944252854     PISSN: 02602105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0260210505006339     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Richard K. Ashley, 'Political Realism and Human Interests', International Studies Quarterly, 25: 2 (1981), pp. 204-36.
2. Sometimes referred to as the 'third' debate, as in Yosef Lapid, 'The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era', International Studies Quarterly, 33: 2 (1989), pp. 235-54. We have adopted the term 'fourth debate' to differentiate the critique of positivism and the emergence of a more post-positivist orientation in IR, from the earlier 'inter-paradigm debate'. On the fourth debate, see Ole Wæver, 'Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms', Iver B. Neumann and Ole Wæver (eds.), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 1-37.
3. Sometimes referred to as the 'third' debate, as in Yosef Lapid, 'The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era', International Studies Quarterly, 33: 2 (1989), pp. 235-54. We have adopted the term 'fourth debate' to differentiate the critique of positivism and the emergence of a more post-positivist orientation in IR, from the earlier 'inter-paradigm debate'. On the fourth debate, see Ole Wæver, 'Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms', Iver B. Neumann and Ole Wæver (eds.), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 1-37.
4. We would like to thank all members of the International Relations Theory Research Group at the Department of Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham as well as the Review's anonymous reviewer for their invaluable contributions in putting this special section together, and in writing this introduction. The Department's financial support for two workshops is gratefully acknowledged.
5. See the references in the contribution by Jürgen Haacke in this Forum. Richard Devetak cites the scant reference to international politics in Habermas's The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory Parts III and IV (Cambridge: Polity, 2002). Richard Devetak, 'Critical Theory', in Scott Burchill et al., Theories of International Relations (London: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 155-80. Fred Dallmayr (discussed at greater length below) cites Habermas's views on global communication, as espoused in 'Reason in the Diversity of its Voices' as another piece that speaks to the concerns of post-positivist IR. Fred Dallmayr, 'Conversation across boundaries: political theory and global diversity', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30: 2 (2001 ) pp. 331 -47.
6. See the references in the contribution by Jürgen Haacke in this Forum. Richard Devetak cites the scant reference to international politics in Habermas's The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory Parts III and IV (Cambridge: Polity, 2002). Richard Devetak, 'Critical Theory', in Scott Burchill et al., Theories of International Relations (London: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 155-80. Fred Dallmayr (discussed at greater length below) cites Habermas's views on global communication, as espoused in 'Reason in the Diversity of its Voices' as another piece that speaks to the concerns of post-positivist IR. Fred Dallmayr, 'Conversation across boundaries: political theory and global diversity', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30: 2 (2001 ) pp. 331 -47.
7. See the references in the contribution by Jürgen Haacke in this Forum. Richard Devetak cites the scant reference to international politics in Habermas's The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory Parts III and IV (Cambridge: Polity, 2002). Richard Devetak, 'Critical Theory', in Scott Burchill et al., Theories of International Relations (London: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 155-80. Fred Dallmayr (discussed at greater length below) cites Habermas's views on global communication, as espoused in 'Reason in the Diversity of its Voices' as another piece that speaks to the concerns of post-positivist IR. Fred Dallmayr, 'Conversation across boundaries: political theory and global diversity', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30: 2 (2001 ) pp. 331 -47.
8. The Editorial Board of Millenium: Journal of' International Studies also pushed for a more empirical basis in critical IR theory (while remaining committed to showcasing post-structuralist and feminist work as well). A good example is Jürgen Haacke, 'Theory and Praxis in International Relations: Habermas, Self-reflection, Rational Argumentation', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 25: 2 (1996), pp. 255-89. We use 'critical theory' in the broad sense of the term to include a range of post-positivist positions. Elsewhere we distinguish between critical and/or constructivist approaches in IR and those inspired by the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School and Habermas particularly.
9. Jim George, Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1994).
10. See, for example, George, Discourses; Robert Cox, 'States, Social Forces and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory', in Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 204-54; John McLean, 'Political Theory, International Theory and Problems of Ideology', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10: 2 (1981), pp. 102-25.
11. See, for example, George, Discourses; Robert Cox, 'States, Social Forces and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory', in Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 204-54; John McLean, 'Political Theory, International Theory and Problems of Ideology', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10: 2 (1981), pp. 102-25.
12. See, for example, George, Discourses; Robert Cox, 'States, Social Forces and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory', in Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 204-54; John McLean, 'Political Theory, International Theory and Problems of Ideology', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10: 2 (1981), pp. 102-25.
13. Lapid, 'Third Debate', p. 243.
14. Ibid., p. 237.
15. George, Discourses; see also Roger Tooze and Craig Murphy (eds.), The New International Political Economy (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1992).
16. George, Discourses; see also Roger Tooze and Craig Murphy (eds.), The New International Political Economy (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1992).
17. Richard K. Ashley, 'Political Realism', pp. 204-36.
18. Richard Ashley, 'Living on the Borderlines', in James DerDerian and Michael J. Shapiro (eds.), International/Intertextual Relations (New York: Lexington Books, 1989), pp. 259-321.
19. The 1988 Special Issue of Millennium: Journal of International Studies along with the publication of Cynthia Enloe's book Bananas, Beaches and Bases in 1989 (London: Pandora) are frequently cited as the beginnings of a feminist discourse within IR.
20. J. Ann Tickner, Gender in International Relations (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993); V. Spike Peterson (ed.) Gendered States: Feminist (Re) Visions of International Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1992).
21. J. Ann Tickner, Gender in International Relations (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993); V. Spike Peterson (ed.) Gendered States: Feminist (Re) Visions of International Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1992).
22. See, for example, Enloe, Bananas; V. Spike Peterson 'Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21: 2 (1992), pp. 183-206; Christine Sylvester, 'Empathetic Cooperation', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23 (1994), pp. 315-36.
23. See, for example, Enloe, Bananas; V. Spike Peterson 'Transgressing Boundar ies: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21: 2 (1992), pp. 183-206; Christine Sylvester, 'Empathetic Cooperation', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23 (1994), pp. 315-36.
24. See, for example, Enloe, Bananas; V. Spike Peterson 'Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21: 2 (1992), pp. 183-206; Christine Sylvester, 'Empathetic Cooperation', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23 (1994), pp. 315-36.
25. Lapid, 'Third Debate', p. 250.
26. Richard K. Ashley and R.B.J. Walker, 'Speaking the Language of Exile', International Studies Quarterly, 34: 3 (1990), p. 259; Christine Sylvester (ed.), 'Special Issue: Feminists Write International Relations', Alternatives, 12: 4 (1993), pp.1-118.
27. Richard K. Ashley and R.B.J. Walker, 'Speaking the Language of Exile', International Studies Quarterly, 34: 3 (1990), p. 259; Christine Sylvester (ed.), 'Special Issue: Feminists Write International Relations', Alternatives, 12: 4 (1993), pp.1-118.
28. Lapid, 'Third Debate', p. 236.
29. Ibid., p. 235.
30. Andrew Linklater, 'The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 22: 2 (1992), pp. 77-98. See also, Lapid, 'Third Debate', pp. 235-54.
31. Andrew Linklater, 'The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 22: 2 (1992), pp. 77-98. See also, Lapid, 'Third Debate', pp. 235-54.
32. Mark Hoffman, 'Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16: 2 (1987), pp. 231-49; Mark Hoffman, 'Conversations on Critical International Relations Theory', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17: 1 (1988), pp. 91-5; N. J. Rengger, 'Going Critical? A Response to Hoffman', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17 (1988), pp. 81-9; see also N. J. Rengger, 'The Fearful Sphere of International Relations', Review of International Studies, 16: 4 (1990), pp. 361-68; N.J. Rengger and Mark Hoffman, 'Modernity, Postmodernity and International Relations', in Joe Doherty, Elspeth Graham and Mo Malek (eds), Post-modernism and the Social Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1992), pp. 127-47; and Linklater, 'The Next Stage', pp. 77-98.
33. Mark Hoffman, 'Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16: 2 (1987), pp. 231-49; Mark Hoffman, 'Conversations on Critical International Relations Theory', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17: 1 (1988), pp. 91-5; N. J. Rengger, 'Going Critical? A Response to Hoffman', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17 (1988), pp. 81-9; see also N. J. Rengger, 'The Fearful Sphere of International Relations', Review of International Studies, 16: 4 (1990), pp. 361-68; N.J. Rengger and Mark Hoffman, 'Modernity, Postmodernity and International Relations', in Joe Doherty, Elspeth Graham and Mo Malek (eds), Post-modernism and the Social Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1992), pp. 127-47; and Linklater, 'The Next Stage', pp. 77-98.
34. Mark Hoffman, 'Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16: 2 (1987), pp. 231-49; Mark Hoffman, 'Conversations on Critical International Relations Theory', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17: 1 (1988), pp. 91-5; N. J. Rengger, 'Going Critical? A Response to Hoffman', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17 (1988), pp. 81-9; see also N. J. Rengger, 'The Fearful Sphere of International Relations', Review of International Studies, 16: 4 (1990), pp. 361-68; N.J. Rengger and Mark Hoffman, 'Modernity, Postmodernity and International Relations', in Joe Doherty, Elspeth Graham and Mo Malek (eds), Post-modernism and the Social Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1992), pp. 127-47; and Linklater, 'The Next Stage', pp. 77-98.
35. Mark Hoffman, 'Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16: 2 (1987), pp. 231-49; Mark Hoffman, 'Conversations on Critical International Relations Theory', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17: 1 (1988), pp. 91-5; N. J. Rengger, 'Going Critical? A Response to Hoffman', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17 (1988), pp. 81-9; see also N. J. Rengger, 'The Fearful Sphere of International Relations', Review of International Studies, 16: 4 (1990), pp. 361-68; N.J. Rengger and Mark Hoffman, 'Modernity, Postmodernity and International Relations', in Joe Doherty, Elspeth Graham and Mo Malek (eds), Post-modernism and the Social Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1992), pp. 127-47; and Linklater, 'The Next Stage', pp. 77-98.
36. Mark Hoffman, 'Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16: 2 (1987), pp. 231-49; Mark Hoffman, 'Conversations on Critical International Relations Theory', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17: 1 (1988), pp. 91-5; N. J. Rengger, 'Going Critical? A Response to Hoffman', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17 (1988), pp. 81-9; see also N. J. Rengger, 'The Fearful Sphere of International Relations', Review of International Studies, 16: 4 (1990), pp. 361-68; N.J. Rengger and Mark Hoffman, 'Modernity, Postmodernity and International Relations', in Joe Doherty, Elspeth Graham and Mo Malek (eds), Post-modernism and the Social Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1992), pp. 127-47; and Linklater, 'The Next Stage', pp. 77-98.
37. Mark Hoffman, 'Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16: 2 (1987), pp. 231-49; Mark Hoffman, 'Conversations on Critical International Relations Theory', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17: 1 (1988), pp. 91-5; N. J. Rengger, 'Going Critical? A Response to Hoffman', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17 (1988), pp. 81-9; see also N. J. Rengger, 'The Fearful Sphere of International Relations', Review of International Studies, 16: 4 (1990), pp. 361-68; N.J. Rengger and Mark Hoffman, 'Modernity, Postmodernity and International Relations', in Joe Doherty, Elspeth Graham and Mo Malek (eds), Post-modernism and the Social Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1992), pp. 127-47; and Linklater, 'The Next Stage', pp. 77-98.
38. In English, see, for example, Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests (Cambridge: Polity, 1986); Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993); The Theory of Communicative Action (Cambridge: Polity, 1986 [vol. 1]; 1989 [vol. 2]).
39. In English, see, for example, Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests (Cambridge: Polity, 1986); Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993); The Theory of Communicative Action (Cambridge: Polity, 1986 [vol. 1]; 1989 [vol. 2]).
40. In English, see, for example, Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests (Cambridge: Polity, 1986); Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993); The Theory of Communicative Action (Cambridge: Polity, 1986 [vol. 1]; 1989 [vol. 2]).
41. For instance in Ashley, 'Political Realism', where Ashley re-covers classical (or 'practical') and an emancipatory (Herzian) realism through Habermas's practical/technical/emancipatory cognitive interest distinction (pp. 207-210).
42. Indeed, in the postscript to Cox's article, reproduced in Keohane (below), he pointed to intellectual influences other than the Frankfurt School, including Giambattista Vico (p. 242). Cox does, however, refer to Habermas in the context of the legitimation crisis of the state. See Robert W. Cox, 'Social Forces, States and World Order', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10: 2 (1981), pp. 126-55, reprinted in an extended form as Cox, 'Social Forces', in Keohane (ed.), Neorealism. The Habermas reference is on p. 206; the introduction of problem-solving v. critical theory on p. 208.
43. Indeed, in the postscript to Cox's article, reproduced in Keohane (below), he pointed to intellectual influences other than the Frankfurt School, including Giambattista Vico (p. 242). Cox does, however, refer to Habermas in the context of the legitimation crisis of the state. See Robert W. Cox, 'Social Forces, States and World Order', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10: 2 (1981), pp. 126-55, reprinted in an extended form as Cox, 'Social Forces', in Keohane (ed.), Neorealism. The Habermas reference is on p. 206; the introduction of problem-solving v. critical theory on p. 208.
44. Ashley, 'Political Realism', p. 207.
45. Ibid., p. 227.
46. Linklater, 'The Next Stage', pp. 77-98; Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community (Oxford: Polity, 1998).
47. Linklater, 'The Next Stage', pp. 77-98; Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community (Oxford: Polity, 1998).
48. Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
49. Thomas Risse, '"Let's Argue!": Communicative action in world politics', International Organization 54: 1 (2000), pp. 1-39. The German debate was kicked off by Harald Müller, 'Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln: Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorie', Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 1: 1 (1994), pp. 15-44. For further references see Risse, 'Let's Argue'. Interestingly, Habermas has yet not commented on this debate.
50. Thomas Risse, '"Let's Argue!": Communicative action in world politics', International Organization 54: 1 (2000), pp. 1-39. The German debate was kicked off by Harald Müller, 'Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln: Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorie', Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 1: 1 (1994), pp. 15-44. For further references see Risse, 'Let's Argue'. Interestingly, Habermas has yet not commented on this debate.
51. Thomas Risse, '"Let's Argue!": Communicative action in world politics', International Organization 54: 1 (2000), pp. 1-39. The German debate was kicked off by Harald Müller, 'Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln: Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorie', Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 1: 1 (1994), pp. 15-44. For further references see Risse, 'Let's Argue'. Interestingly, Habermas has yet not commented on this debate.
52. See, for example, Fiona Robinson, Globalising Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1999); Kimberley Hutchins, 'Towards a Feminist International Ethics', Review of International Studies, 26: Special Issue (2000), pp. 111-30; David Campbell, Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993). For a criticism of post-positivist IR in this regard, see Mervyn Frost, 'A Turn not Taken; Ethics in IR at the Millennium', Review of International Studies, 24: Special Issue (1998), pp. 119-32.
53. See, for example, Fiona Robinson, Globalising Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1999); Kimberley Hutchins, 'Towards a Feminist International Ethics', Review of International Studies, 26: Special Issue (2000), pp. 111-30; David Campbell, Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993). For a criticism of post-positivist IR in this regard, see Mervyn Frost, 'A Turn not Taken; Ethics in IR at the Millennium', Review of International Studies, 24: Special Issue (1998), pp. 119-32.
54. See, for example, Fiona Robinson, Globalising Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1999); Kimberley Hutchins, 'Towards a Feminist International Ethics', Review of International Studies, 26: Special Issue (2000), pp. 111-30; David Campbell, Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993). For a criticism of post-positivist IR in this regard, see Mervyn Frost, 'A Turn not Taken; Ethics in IR at the Millennium', Review of International Studies, 24: Special Issue (1998), pp. 119-32.
55. See, for example, Fiona Robinson, Globalising Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1999); Kimberley Hutchins, 'Towards a Feminist International Ethics', Review of International Studies, 26: Special Issue (2000), pp. 111-30; David Campbell, Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993). For a criticism of post-positivist IR in this regard, see Mervyn Frost, 'A Turn not Taken; Ethics in IR at the Millennium', Review of International Studies, 24: Special Issue (1998), pp. 119-32.
56. Andrew Linklater, 'The achievements of critical theory', in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996), pp. 279-98.
57. See also Devetak, 'Critical Theory'.
58. Nancy Fraser, 'What's Critical about Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender', New German Critique, 35 (1985), pp. 97-131, For a discussion of the usefulness (and limitations) of Habermas's model of dialogue in relation to struggles around women's human rights, see Brooke Ackerly 'Women's Rights Activists as Cross-Cultural Theorists', International Feminist Journal of Politics,3: 3 (2001), pp. 311-46.
59. Nancy Fraser, 'What's Critical about Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender', New German Critique, 35 (1985), pp. 97-131, For a discussion of the usefulness (and limitations) of Habermas's model of dialogue in relation to struggles around women's human rights, see Brooke Ackerly 'Women's Rights Activists as Cross-Cultural Theorists', International Feminist Journal of Politics,3: 3 (2001), pp. 311-46.
60. On these issues, see Nancy Fraser, 'What's Critical'.
61. One could point to an extensive number of sources here, but for a good overview of the debate between post-structuralist feminism and 'critical' feminism, see Linda J. Nicholson, Feminism/Postmodernism (London: Routledge, 1990).
62. See Sylvester, 'Empathetic Cooperation'; Inderpal Grewal and Caren Kaplan (eds.), Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Politics (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1994).
63. Dallmayr, 'Conversation'.
64. Ibid., pp. 342-7.
65. William E. Connolly, 'Cross-State Citizen Networks: A Response to Dallmayr', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30: 2 (2001), pp. 348-55. See also William E. Connolly, The Ethos of Pluralization (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).
66. William E. Connolly, 'Cross-State Citizen Networks: A Response to Dallmayr', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30: 2 (2001), pp. 348-55. See also William E. Connolly, The Ethos of Pluralization (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).
67. Connolly, 'Cross-State Citizen Networks'.
68. N. J. Rengger, 'The Boundaries of Conversation: a Response to Dallmayr', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30: 2 (2001), pp. 357-64.
69. George, Discourses.
70. Mitehell Stephens, 'The Theologian of Talk', Los Angeles Times Magazine, 23 October 1994, 〈http://www.nyu.edu/classes/stephens/Habermas%20page.htm〉 (11 December 2003).
71. George, Discourses, pp. 165-6.
72. Ibid., pp. 182-8.
73. Campbell, Politics without Principle, pp. 95-99.
74. On the theme of different forms of Othering, see also Thomas Diez, 'Europe's Others and the Return of Geopolitics', Cambridge' Review of International Affairs, 17: 2 (2004), pp. 319-35.
75. Molly Cochran, 'Deweyan Pragmatism and Post-Positivist Social Science in IR', in Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31: 3 (2002), pp, 525-48; David Owen 'Re-Orienting International Relations: On Pragmatism, Pluralism and Practical Reasoning', in Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31: 3 (2002), pp. 653-73.
76. Molly Cochran, 'Deweyan Pragmatism and Post-Positivist Social Science in IR', in Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31: 3 (2002), pp, 525-48; David Owen 'Re-Orienting International Relations: On Pragmatism, Pluralism and Practical Reasoning', in Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31: 3 (2002), pp. 653-73.
77. Owen, 'Re-Orienting IR', p. 658.
78. On the issue of different theoretical practices and purposes, see also Thomas Diez and Antje Wiener, 'Introducing the Mosaic of Integration Theory', and Wiener and Diez, 'Taking Stock of Integration Theory', in Wiener and Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 3, 243-4.
79. On the issue of different theoretical practices and purposes, see also Thomas Diez and Antje Wiener, 'Introducing the Mosaic of Integration Theory', and Wiener and Diez, 'Taking Stock of Integration Theory', in Wiener and Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 3, 243-4.
80. Alexander Wendt, A Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
81. Axel Honneth, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996). For further references see Haacke's contribution.