An integrated linear/non-linear flow model for the conduit-fissure-pore media in the karst triple void aquifer system

Environmental Geology

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 163-174

  Cheng, J M ^a,b   Chen, C X ^a  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF GEOSCIENCES   (China)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

China; Conduit fissure matrix; General Darcy's law form; Karst triple media; Linear nonlinear flow; Numerical model

Indexed keywords

CONFINED FLOW; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; POROSITY;

AQUIFER MEDIA; EQUIVALENT HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (EHC); MATRIX PORE; NON-LINEAR FLOW;

AQUIFERS;

AQUIFER; DARCY LAW; FLOW MODELING; KARST HYDROLOGY; POROUS MEDIUM;

ASIA; CHINA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; FAR EAST; GUANGXI ZHUANGZU; WORLD;

EID: 12844279493     PISSN: 09430105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-004-1128-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Atkinson TC (1977) Diffuse flow and conduit flow in limestone terrain in the Mendip Hills, Somerset, Great Britain. J Hydrol 35:93-110
2. Barenblatt GE, Zheltov IP, Kochina IN (1960) Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homegeneous liquids in fissured rocks. J Appl Math Mech (USSR) 24:1286-1303
3. Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York
4. Chen CX (1966) Groundwater hydaulics (in Chinese). Beijing Geology College, Beijing
5. Chen CX (1995) Groundwater flow model and simulation method in triple karst tube-fissure-pore (in Chinese with English abstract). Earth Sci 20(4):361-366
6. Chen CX, Jiao JJ (1999) Numerical simulation of pumping tests in multiplayer wells with non-Darcian flow in wellbore. Ground Water 37(3):465-474
7. Chen CX, Wan JW, Zhan HB (2003) Theoretical and experimental studies of coupled seepage-pipe flow to a horizontal well. J Hydrol 281:159-171
8. Chen CX, Wu L, Lin M (1992) Theory and application of model couping seepage and pipe flow for unsteady multilayer pumping tests. Science and Technical Report. No. 88172K051 (In Chinese). Geology and Mineral Resources Bureau, Guangxi autonomous region, China
9. Cornation F, Perrochet P (2002) Analytical 1D dual-porosity equivalent solutions to 3D discrete single-continuum models. Application to Karstic spring hydrograph modelling. J Hydrol 262:165-176
10. Cui GZ, Zhu YF (1988) Hybrid simulation for karst water systems: exemplified by Beishan karst water system (in Chinese with English abstract). Carsolog Sina 7(3):15-19
11. Dreiss SJ (1982) Linear Kemels for karst aquifers. Water Resour Res 18(4):865-876
12. Eisenlohr L, Kiraly L, Bouzelboudjen M, Rossier Y (1997) Numerical simulation as a tool for checking the interpretation of karst spring hydrographs. J Hydrol 193:306-315
13. Halihan T, Wicks CM (1998) Modeling of storm responses in conduit flow aquifer with reservoirs. J Hydrol 208:82-91
14. Howard AD, Groves CG (1995) Earlyde-velopmentofkarstsystems: 2. turbulent flow. Water Resour Res 31(1):19-26
15. Kaufmann G (2003) A model comparison of karst aquifer evolution for different matrix-flow formulations. J Hydrol 283:281-289
16. Lan Z, Chen M, Chen C (1977) Application of system analysis approach in the response of Le Long Dong karst spring (in Chinese). J Hydrogeol Technol Approach 3:22-32
17. Larocque M, Banton O, Ackerer P, Razack M (1999) Determining karst transmissivities with inverse modeling and an equivalent porous media. Ground Water 37(6):897-903
18. Liedl R, Sauter M, Huckinghaus D, Clemens T, Teutsch G (2003) Simulation of the development of karst aquifer using a coupled continuum pipe flow model. Water Resour Res 39(3):1057-1067
19. Lin M, Chen CX (1988) Analytic models of groundwater flows to karst springs. In : Yuan DX (ed) Karst hydrogeology and karst environment protection, Proceedings of the 21st IAH Congress, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, IAHS Spec Publ. No. 176 1(2):647-654
20. Lomijie GM (1951) Groundwater movement in rock formation (in Russian), National Electric Publishing House, Russia
21. Mohrlok U, Teutsch G. (1997) Double continuum porous equivalent (DCPE) versus discrete modelling in karst terranes. In: Günay G, Johnson AI (eds) Karst water and environmental impacts. Proceedings 5th international symposium and field seminar on karst waters and environmental impacts, 10-20 September1995, Antalya, Turkey, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 319-316
22. Sauter M, Liedl R (2000) Modeling karst aquifer geneisi using a coupled continuum-pipe flow model. In: Klimchouk AB (ed) Speleogenesis-evolution of karst aquifers. Nat. Speleol. Soc., Huntsville, Alabama, pp 212-219
23. Streeter VL (1961) Handbook of fluid dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York
24. Teutsch G (1993) An extended double-porosity concept as a practical modeling approach for a karstified terrain. In: Cultekin G, Johnson AI, Back W (eds) Hydrogeological processes in karst terrains. Proc. Antalya Symposium and Field Seminar, IAHS Spec. Publ. 207, pp 281-292
25. White WB (1969) Conceptual models for carbonate aquifers. Ground Water 1(1):15-21
26. White WB (2002) Karst hydrology: recent developments and open questions. Eng Geol 65(2-3):85-105
27. Wicks CM, Heman JS (1995) The effect of zones of high of porosity and permeability on the configuration of saline-freshwater mixing zone. Ground Water 33(5):733-740
28. Worthington SRH (2003) A comprehensive strategy for understanding flow in carbon aquifer. Speleog Evol Karst Aquifers 1(1):1-8
29. Zhang BY, Lerner DN (2000) Modeling of ground water flow to adits. Ground Water 38(1):99-109
30. Zhu YF, Cui GZ, Qin XQ, Xia ZY (1992) The analysis of groundwater flow systems in karst aquifers: approach and application (in Chinese). Guangxi Science and Technology, Nanni, China