The value of magnetocardiography in patients with and without relevant stenoses of the coronary arteries using an unshielded system

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 8-16

  Hailer, Birgit ^a,d   Chaikovsky, Ilja ^b   Auth Eisernitz, Sabine ^a   Schäfer, Harald ^a   Van Leeuwen, Peter ^c  

^a Philippusstift ^*  (Germany)

^b Squid AG   (Germany)

^c EFMT   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Current density reconstruction; Electrocardiography; Four channel magnetometer; Magnetocardiography; Unshielded setting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE AND RHYTHM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETOCARDIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RECORDER; REPOLARIZATION; REST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL AVERAGED ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ST SEGMENT; THORAX PAIN; VECTORCARDIOGRAPHY;

CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 12844276010     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09318.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ESC Working Group on Exercise Physiology, Physiopathology and Electrocardiography. Guidelines for cardiac exercise testing. Eur Heart J 1993; 14:969-988.
2. Simoons ML, Hugenholtz PG. Estimation of the probability of exercise induced ischemia by quantitative ECG analysis. Circulation 1977; 56:552-559.
3. Zaret BL, Wackers FJ. Medical progress: Nuclear cardiology (first of two part). N Engl J Med 1993; 329:775-783.
4. Zimmermann R, vom Dahl J, Schafers M, et al. Positionsbericht nuklearkardiologischer diagnostik - Update. Z Kardiol 2002; 91:88-92.
5. Cohen JL, Chan KL, Jaarsma W, et al. Arbutamine echocardiography: Efficacy and safety of a new pharmacologic stress agent to induce myocardial ischemia and detect coronary artery disease. The International Arbutamine Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26:1168-1175.
6. Schmermund, Baumgart D, Erbel R. Potential and pitfalls of electron-beam computed tomography in detecting coronary atherosclerosis. Bas Res Cardiol 1999; 94:427-444.
7. Yong KW, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1863-1869.
8. Bielak LF, Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF II, et al. Probabilistic model for pre-diction of angiographically defined obstructive coronary artery disease using electron beam computed tomography calcium score strata. Circulation 2000; 102:380-385.
9. Montague TJ, Witkowski FX. The clinical utility of body surface potential mapping in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:378-383.
10. Montague TJ, Witkowski FX, Miller RM, et al. Exercise body surface potential mapping in single and multiple coronary artery disease. Chest 1990; 97:1333-1342.
11. Stilli D, Musso E, Macchi E, et al. Body surface potential mapping in ischemic patients with normal resting ECG. Can J Cardiol 1986; 107A-112A.
12. Kittnar O, Slavicek J, Vavrova M. Repolarization pattern of body surface potential maps (BSPM) in coronary artery disease. Physiol Res 1993; 42:123-130.
13. Lant J, Stroink G, ten Voorde B, et al. Complementary nature of electrocardiographic and magnetocardiographic data in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Electrocardiol 1990; 23:315-322.
14. Stroink G. Cardiomagnetic imaging. In BL Zaret, Kaufmann L, Berson AS, Dunn RA (eds.): Frontiers in Cardiovascular Imaging. New York, Raven Press, 1993, pp. 161-177.
15. Koch H. SQUID magnetocardiography: Status and perspectives. IEEE Trans Appl Superconduct 2001; 11:49-59.
16. Kosch O, Meindl P, Steinhoff U, et al. Physical aspects of cardiac magnetic fields and electric potentials. In J. Nenonen, Jimaniemi RJ, Katila T (eds.): Biomag 2000, Proc 12th Int Conf on Biomagnetism. Espoo, Helsinki Univ. Technology, 2001, pp. 553-556.
17. Takala P, Hänninen H, Montonen J, et al. Magnetocardiographic and electrocardiographic exercise mapping in healthy subjects. Ann Biomed Eng 2001; 29:501-509.
18. Hailer B, van Leeuwen P, Lange S, et al. Coronary artery disease may alter the spatial dispersion of QT interval at rest. Ann Noninvas Electrocardiol 1999; 4:267-273.
19. Van Leeuwen P, Hailer B, Wehr M. Changes in current dipole parameters in patients with coronary artery disease with and without myocardial infarction. Biomed Tech 1997; 42:132-135.
20. Van Leeuwen P, Hailer B, Lange S, et al. Spatial distribution of repolarization times in patients with coronary artery disease. PACE 2003; 26:1706-1714.
21. Fenici R, Brisinda D, Meloni AM. First 36-channel system for clinical magnetocardiography in unshielded hospital laboratory for cardiac electrophysiology. IJBEM 2003; 5:80-83.
22. Hailer B, Chaikovsky I, Auth-Eisernitz S, et al. Magnetocardiography in coronary artery disease with a new system in an unshielded setting. Clin Cardiol 2003; 26:465-471.
23. Oppelt A, Scholz B, Schneider S. Physical principles of biomagnetism. In K. Bachmann, Stefan H, Vieth J (eds.): Biomagnetism: Principles, Models and Clinical Research. Proc Opening Symposium Biomagnetic Center Erlangen. Erlangen, Verlag Palm & Enke, 1992, pp. 1-10.
24. Romanovych S, Steinberg F, Sosnitsky V, et al. Imaging of heart biomagnetic sources by current lines in a plane using the magnetic moments method. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999; 37(2):410-411.
25. Romanovych S. Reconstruction of three components dipoles within layer. Biomed Tech 1997; 42(1):227-30.
26. Chaikovskya I, Katz D, Katz M. Principles of magnetocardiographic maps - classification and CAD detection. Int J Bioelectromag 2003; 5:100-101.
27. Nenonen J. Solving the inverse problem in magnetocardiography. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1994; 13:487-496.
28. Nenonen JT, Hamalainen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ. Minimum-norm estimation in a boundary-element torso model. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994; 32:43-48.
29. MacLeod RS, Lus RL, Taccardi B. A possible mechanism for electrocardiographically silent changes in cardiac repolarization. J Electrocardiol 1998; 30:114-121.
30. Haenninen H, Takala P, Maekijaervi M, et al. Recording location in multichannel magnetocardioography and body surface potential mapping sensitive for regional exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia. Basic Res Cardiol 2001; 96:405-414.
31. Sato M, Terada Y, Mitsui T, et al. Detection of myocardial ischemia by magntetocardiogram using 64-channel SQUID system. In J. Nenonen, Jimaniemi RJ, Katila T (eds.): Biomag 2000, Proc 12th Int Conf on Biomagnetism. Espoo, Helsinki Univ. Technology, 2001, 523-526.
32. Tsukada K, Miyashita T, Kandori A, et al. An iso-integral mapping technique using magnetocardiogram an dits possible use for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Int J Card Imaging 2000; 16:55-60.
33. Nenonen J, Pesola K, Hänninen H, et al. Current-density estimation of exercise induced ischemia in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. J Electrocardiol 2001; 34(Suppl):37-42.
34. Haenninen H, Takala P, Korhonen P, et al. Features of ST segment and T-wave in exercise-induced myocardial ischemia evaluated with multichannel magnetocardiography. Ann Med 2002; 34:120-129.
35. Kloner RA, Przyklenk K, Patel B. Altered myocardial states: The stunned and hibernating myocardium. Am J Med 1986; 86(Suppl. 1A):14-21.
36. Tardif JC, Bertrand OF, Mongrain R, et al. Reliability of mechanical and phased-array designs for serial intravascular ultrasound examinations. Int J Card Imaging 2000; 16:365-375.
37. Brisinda D, Meloni AM, Fenici R. First 36-channel magnetocardiographic study of CAD patients inn an unshielded laboratory for interventional and intensive cardiac care. In I. Mangia, Magnin JE, Montagnat J, Clatysge P, Nenonen J, Katila T (eds.): FIMH 2003. Berlin, Springer, 2003, pp. 122-131.