Bayesianism and irrelevant conjunction

Philosophy of Science

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 515-520

  Maher, Patrick ^a  

^a 105 Gregory Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12844263685     PISSN: 00318248     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/423750     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Carnap, Rudolf (1950), Logical Foundations of Probability, 2d ed., 1962. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Earman, John (1992), Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Fitelson, Branden (2002), "Putting the Irrelevance Back into the Problem of Irrelevant Conjunction", Philosophy of Science 69: 611-622.
4. Gemes, Ken (1994), "A New Theory of Content I: Basic Content", Journal of Philosophical Logic 23: 595-620.
5. Goodman, Nelson (1979), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 3d ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.
6. Hawthorne, James, and Branden Fitelson (2004), "Re-solving Irrelevant Conjunction with Probabilistic Independence", Philosophy of Science 71: 505-514.
7. Horwich, Paul (1982), Probability and Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Kuipers, Theo A. F. (2000), From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Milne, Peter (1996), "Log[p(h/eb)/p(h/b)] is the One True Measure of Confirmation", Philosophy of Science 63: 21-26.
10. Nicod, Jean (1923), Le Problème Logique de l'Induction. Paris: Alcan.
11. _ (1970), Geometry and Induction. [English translation of works originally published in French in 1923 and 1924.] Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
12. Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1994), "Bayesian Confirmation: Paradise Regained", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 467-476.