Integrating a performance-based approach into practice: A case study

Building Research and Information

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 128-141

  Hammond, David ^a   Dempsey, James J ^a   Szigeti, Françoise ^a   Davis, Gerald ^a  

^a ICF   (Canada)

Author keywords

Constructed assets; Facility assessment; Functionality; Integrated decision making process; Performance indicators; Serviceability; Suitability; United States; Value chain

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; DECISION MAKING; INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; LEGACY SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CONSTRUCTED ASSETS; FACILITY ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONALITY; INTEGRATED DECISION-MAKING PROCESS; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; SERVICEABILITY; SUITABILITY; UNITED STATES; VALUE CHAIN;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 12844260714     PISSN: 09613218     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0961321052000327739     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. ASTM (2000) ASTM Standards on Whole Building Functionality and Serviceability, compendium 2nd Edn, West Conshohocken, PA, American Society for Testing and Materials.
2. Dempsey, J.J. and Hammond, D.M. (2002) The Framework for Integrated Decision-Making, in Proceedings of the 2002 Geospatial Technologies Symposium, CADD/GIS Technology Center.
3. Gibson, E.J. (1982) Working with the Performance Approach in Building. Report No. 64, Rotterdam, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB).
4. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) ISO/ CD 21933-1 Performance Standards in Building - Levels of Functional Requirements and Levels of Serviceability - Part 1: Principles, ISO, Geneva.
5. Mintzberg, H. (1994) The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, January-February.
6. Szigeti, F. and Davis, G. (2001a) Appendix A - Functionality and serviceability standards: tools for stating functional requirements and for evaluating facilities, in Learning from Our Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Practice Summary of Post-Occupancy Evaluation. National Academy Press for the Federal Facilities Council, Washington, DC.
7. Szigeti, F. and Davis, G. (2001b) Matching people and their facilities: using the ASTM/ANSI Standards on whole building functionality and serviceability, in CIB World Building Congress 2001 Proceedings: Performance in Product and Practice, Rotterdam, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB).
8. Szigeti, F., Davis, G. and Hammond, D. (2004a) ASTM standard methodology and case study, in Preiser, W.F.E, and Vischer, J.C. (eds): Assessing Building Performance: Methods and Case Studies, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
9. Szigeti, F., Davis, G., Dempsey, J.J., Hammond, D., Davis, D., Colombard-Prout, M. and Catarina, O. (2004b) Defining performance requirements to assess the suitability of constructed assets in support of the mission of the organization, in CIB 2004 Congress Proceedings, Rotterdam, CIB.
10. US Government (1993) Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), 1993, Washington, DC.
11. US Government (1999) Executive Order 13123: Greening the Government through Efficient Energy Management, 3 June 1999, White House (US President's Management Agenda), Washington, DC.
12. US Government (2004) Executive Order 13327: Federal Real Property Asset Management, 6 February 2004, White House (US President's Management Agenda), Washington, DC.