Effects of positive results for Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis as determined by microbial culture of feces or antibody ELISA on results of caudal fold tuberculin test and interferon-γ assay for tuberculosis in cattle

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Volumn 226, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 429-435

  Dunn, John R ^a   Kaneene, John B ^a   Grooms, Daniel L ^a   Bolin, Steven R ^a   Bolin, Carole A ^a   Bruning Fann, Colleen S ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAMMA INTERFERON;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CATTLE DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FECES CULTURE; MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; TUBERCULIN TEST; TUBERCULOSIS;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, BACTERIAL; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CROSS REACTIONS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FECES; INTERFERON TYPE II; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUBERCULIN TEST; TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS TAURUS; MYCOBACTERIUM; MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM; MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS;

EID: 12744278331     PISSN: 00031488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.429     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Morrison WI, Bourne FJ, Cox DR, et al. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of infections with Mycobacterium bovis in cattle. Independent scientific group on cattle TB. Vet Rec 2000;146:236-242.
2. Schmitt SM, O'Brien DJ, Bruning-Fann CS, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in Michigan wildlife and livestock. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;969:262-268.
3. Michigan bovine tuberculosis Web site. Maps: TB positive animals. Available at: www.bovinetb.com. Accessed Sep 24, 2003.
4. It's official. Texas loses cattle tuberculosis "free" status [press release]. Austin, Tex: Texas Animal Health Commission, Jun 7, 2002.
5. Bovine tuberculosis found in cattle [press release]. Sacramento, Calif: California Department of Food and Agriculture, Jun 3, 2002.
6. USDA amends bovine tuberculosis classification of New Mexico [press release]. Washington, DC: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Jul 24, 2003.
7. Aagaard C, Govaerts M, Meng Okkels L, et al. Genomic approach to identification of Mycobacterium bovis diagnostic antigens in cattle. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:3719-3728.
8. Karlson AG. Nonspecific or cross-sensitivity reactions to tuberculin in cattle. Adv Vet Sci 1962;7:148-175.
9. Ketterer PJ, Rogers RJ, Donald B. Pathology and tuberculin sensitivity in cattle inoculated with Mycobacterium avium complex serotypes 6, 14, and 18. Aust Vet J 1981;57:61-65.
10. McIntyre G, Stanford JL. Immunodiffusion analysis shows that Mycobacterium paratuberculosis and other mycobactin-dependent mycobacteria are variants of Mycobacterium avium. J Appl Bacteriol 1986;61:295-298.
11. Smyth RH, Christie GJ. Some observations on Johne's disease with a further note on the examination of fecal samples. Vet Rec 1950;62:429-450.
12. Braun RK, Buergelt CD, Litell RC, et al. Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to estimate prevalence of paratuberculosis in cattle of Florida. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;196:1251-1254.
13. Whipple DL, Callihan DR, Jarnagin JL. Cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal specimens and a suggested standardized procedure. J Vet Diagn Invest 1991;3:368-373.
14. Thoen CO, Baum KH. Current knowledge on paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988;192:1609-1611.
15. Kreeger JM. Ruminant paratuberculosis - a century of progress and frustration. J Vet Diagn Invest 1991;3:373-382.
16. Johnson-Ifearulundu Y, Kaneene JB. Distribution and environmental risk factors for paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds in Michigan. Am J Vet Res 1990;60:589-596.
17. National Animal Health Monitoring System. Johne's disease on US dairy operations. #N245.1097. Fort Collins, Colo: USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, National Animal Health Monitoring System, 1997.
18. USDA. Bovine tuberculosis eradication. uniform methods and rules, effective January 22, 1999. USDA-APHIS 91-45-011. Riverdale, Md: USDA, 1999.
19. Whipple DL, Palmer MV, Slaughter RE, et al. Comparison of purified protein derivatives and effect of skin testing on results of a commercial gamma interferon assay for diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest 2001;13:117-122.
20. Fyock TL, Whitlock RH. Recommended culture protocol for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Standard operating procedure. Kennett Square, Pa: New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1999.
21. Stabel JR. Production of γ-interferon by peripheral blood mononuclear cells: an important diagnostic tool for detection of subclinical paratuberculosis. J Vet Diagn Invest 1996;8:345-350.
22. Köhler H, Gyra H, Zimmer K, et al. Immune reactions in cattle after immunization with a Mycobacterium paratuberculosis vaccine and implications for the diagnosis of M. paratuberculosis and M. bovis infections. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2001;48:185-195.
23. Sockett DC, Carr DJ, Collins MT. Evaluation of conventional and radiometric fecal culture and a commercial DNA probe for diagnosis of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infections in cattle. Can J Vet Res 1992;56:148-153.
24. Zimmer K, Drager KG, Klawonn W, et al. Contribution to the diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle. Comparative studies on the validity of Ziehl-Neelsen staining, faecal culture and a commercially available DNA-probe test in detecting Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in faeces from cattle. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 1999;46:137-140.
25. Reichel MP, Kittelberger R, Penrose ME, et al. Comparison of serological tests and faecal culture for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in cattle and analysis of the antigens involved. Vet Microbiol 1999;66:135-150.
26. Collins MT, Sockett DC, Ridge S, et al. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Johne's disease. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:272-276.
27. Lauzi S, Pasotto D, Amadori M, et al. Evaluation of the specificity of the γ-interferon test in Italian bovine tuberculosis-free herds. Vet J 2000;160:17-24.
28. Ryan TJ, Buddle BM, DeLisle GW. An evaluation of the gamma interferon test for detecting bovine tuberculosis in cattle 8 to 28 days after tuberculin skin testing. Res Vet Sci 2000;69:57-61.
29. Scacchia M, Lelli R, Petrini A, et al. Use of innovative methods in the eradication of bovine tuberculosis. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2000;47:321-327.
30. Wood PR, Corner LA, Rothel JS, et al. A field evaluation of serological and cellular diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis. Vet Microbiol 1992;31:71-79.
31. Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus JC, et al. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:7877-7882.