Dominance-related foraging in female domesticated canaries under laboratory conditions

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 82, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1246-1250

  Parisot, M ^a   Nagle, L ^a   Vallet, E ^a   Kreutzer, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; FOOD PRODUCTS; LABORATORIES; SEED; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

FLOCKS; FOOD FINDERS; FORAGING BEHAVIORS; SOCIAL STATUS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BIRD; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL STATUS;

BIODIVERSITY; FORAGE; LABORATORIES;

AVES; SERINUS CANARIA;

EID: 12744278281     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z04-101     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alonso, J.C., Alonso, J.A., Bautista, L.M., and Munoz-Pulido, R. 1995. Patch use in cranes: a field test of optimal foraging predictions. Anim. Behav. 49: 1367-1379.
2. Archawaranon, M., Dove, L., and Wiley, R.H. 1991. Social inertia and hormonal control of aggression and dominance in white-throated sparrows. Behaviour, 118: 42-65.
3. Baker, M.C., Belcher, C.S., Deutsch, L.C., Sherman, G.L., and Thompson, D.B. 1981. Foraging success in junco flocks and effects of social hierarchy. Anim. Behav. 29: 137-142.
4. Barnard, C.J. 1980. Flock feeding and time budgets in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus L.). Anim. Behav. 28: 295-309.
5. Bernstein, I.S. 1981. Dominance: the baby and the bathwater. Behav. Brain Sci. 4: 419-429.
6. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1984. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Vol. 2. 1st ed. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, Ont.
7. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, Ont.
8. Caraco, T., Barkan, C., Beacham, J.L., Brisbin, L., Lima, S., Mohan, A., Newmen, J.A., Webb, W., and Withiam, M.L. 1989. Dominance and social foraging: a laboratory study. Anim. Behav. 38: 41-58.
9. Carrascal, L.M., and Polo, V. 1999. Coal tits, Parus ater, lose weight in response to chases by predators. Anim. Behav. 58: 281-285.
10. Carrascal, L.M., Senar, J.C., Mozetich, I., Uribe, F., and Domenech, J. 1998. Interactions among environmental stress, body condition, nutritional status, and dominance in great tits. Auk, 115: 727-738.
11. Chalmers, N. 1979. Dominance and subordinacy. In Social behaviour in primates. Edited by E.J. Barrington, A.J. Willis, and M.A. Sleigh. Edward Arnold, London. pp. 160-184.
12. Cristol, D.A. 1995. The coat-tail effect in merged flocks of dark-eyed juncos: social status depends on familiarity. Anim. Behav. 50: 151-159.
13. Delestrade, A. 1999. Foraging strategy in a social bird, the alpine chough: effect of variation in quantity and distribution of food. Anim. Behav. 57: 299-305.
14. Drews, C. 1993. The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour, 125: 283-313.
15. Ekman, J. 1987. Exposure and time use in the willow tit flocks: the cost of subordination. Anim. Behav. 35: 445-452.
16. Ekman, J., and Askenmo, C.E.H. 1984. Social rank and habitat use in willow tit groups. Anim. Behav. 32: 508-514.
17. Fisler, G.F. 1977. Interspecific hierarchy at an artificial food source. Anim. Behav. 25: 240-244.
18. Gosler, A.G., Greenwood, J.D., and Perrins, C. 1995. Predation risk and the cost of being fat. Nature (Lond.), 377: 621-623.
19. Greenberg, R. 1983. The role of neophobia in determining the degree of foraging specialization in some migrant warblers. Am. Nat. 122: 444-453.
20. Greenberg, R. 1989. Neophobia, aversion to open space, and ecological plasticity in Song and Swamp sparrows. Can. J. Zool. 67: 1194-1199.
21. Greenberg, R. 1990. Feeding neophobia and ecological plasticity: a test of the hypothesis with captive sparrows. Anim. Behav. 39: 375-379.
22. Hagelin, J.C. 2002. The kinds of traits involved in male-male competition: a comparison of plumage, behavior, and body size in quail. Behav. Ecol. 13: 32-41.
23. Hogstad, O. 1988. Rank-related resource access in winter flocks of willow tit Parus montanus. Ornis Scand. 19: 169-174.
24. Keys, G.C., and Rothstein, S.I. 1991. Benefits and cost of dominance and subordinance in white-crowned sparrows and the paradox of status signalling. Anim. Behav. 42: 899-912.
25. Kijne, M., and Kotrschal, K. 2002. Neophobia affects choice of food-item size in group-foraging common ravens (Corvus corax). Acta Ethol. 5: 13-18.
26. Koivula, K., Lahti, K., Rytokonen, S., and Orell, M. 1994. Do subordinates expose themselves to predation? Field experiments on feeding site selection by the willow tits. J. Avian Biol. 25: 178-183.
27. Krams, I.A. 2000. Length of feeding day and body weight of great tits in a single and a two-predator environment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48: 147-153.
28. Krams, I.A. 2002. Mass-dependent take-off ability in wintering great tit (Parus major): comparison of top-ranked adult males and subordinate juvenile females. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 345-349.
29. Lahti, K., Orell, M., Rytkönen S., and Koivula, K. 1998. Time and food dependence in willow tit winter survival. Ecology, 79: 2904-2916.
30. Leitner, M.H., Romero-Pujante, M., Hoi, H., and Pavlova, A. 2001. Food availability and immune capacity in serin (Serinus serinus) nestlings. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 333-339.
31. Lima, S.L. 1995. Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group size effect. Anim. Behav. 49: 11-20.
32. Mönkkönen, M., and Koivula, K. 1993. Neophobia and social learning of foraging skills in willow tits Parus montanus. Ardea, 81: 43-46.
33. Piper, W.H. 1997. Social dominance in birds, Early findings and new horizons. In Current ornithology. Edited by V. Nolan, E.D. Ketterson, and C.F. Thompson. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 125-187.
34. Polo, V., and Bautista, L.M. 2002. Daily body mass regulation in dominance-structured coal tit (Parus ater) flocks in response to variable food access: a laboratory study. Behav. Ecol. 13: 696-704.
35. Richner, H. 1989. Phenotypic correlates of dominance in carrion crows and their effects on access to food. Anim. Behav. 38: 606-612.
36. Roberts, G. 1996. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim. Behav. 51: 1077-1086.
37. Rohwer, S., and Ewald, P.W. 1981. The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signalling system. Evolution, 35: 441-454.
38. Searcy, W.A. 1979. Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male red-winged blackbirds. Condor, 81: 417-420.
39. Senar, J.C., and Camerino, M. 1998. Status signalling and the ability to recognize dominants: an experiment with siskins (Carduelis spinus). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265: 1515-1520.
40. Smith, R.D., Ruxton, G.D., and Cresswell, W. 2001. Dominance and feeding interference in small groups of blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. 12: 475-481.
41. SPSS Inc. 1992-1997. SigmaStat® for Windows. Version 2.03 [computer program]. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
42. Stahl, J., Tolsma, P.H., Loonen, M.J.J.E., and Drent, R.H. 2001. Subordinates explore but dominants profit: resource competition in high Arctic barnacle goose flocks. Anim. Behav. 61: 257-264.
43. Theimer, T.C. 1987. The effect of seed dispersion on the foraging success of dominant and subordinate dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis. Anim. Behav. 35: 1883-1890.
44. Tiebout, H.M. 1996. Costs and benefits of interspecific dominance rank: are subordinates better at finding novel food locations? Anim. Behav. 51: 1375-1381.
45. Verbeek, M.E.M., Goede, P.D., Drent, P.J., and Wiepkema, P.R. 1999. Individual behavioural characteristics and dominance in aviary groups of Great Tits. Behaviour, 136: 23-48.
46. Voigt, C., and Leitner, S. 1998. Breeding biology of the island canary serinus canaria (Aves: fringillidae) on the desertas island ilhéu chao. Bol. Mus. Munic. Funchal. 50: 117-124.
47. Wiley, R.H. 1990. Prior-residence and coat-tail effects in dominance relationships of male dark-eyed junco, Junco hyemalis. Anim. Behav. 40: 587-596.
48. Wiley, R.H. 1991. Both high- and low-ranking white -throated sparrows find novel locations of food. Auk, 108: 8-15.