A recipe for Bayesian network driven stock assessment

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 61, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1647-1657

  Hammond, T R ^a,b  

^a CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^b DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRYING CAPACITY; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; MARKOV CHAIN; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 12744274846     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F04-107     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cowles, M., and Carlin, B. 1996. Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91: 883-904.
2. Cozman, F.G. 2000. Generalizing variable elimination in Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the IBERAMIA/SBIA 2000 Workshops (Workshop on Probabilistic Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence). Editora Tec Art, Sao Paulo, Brazil. pp. 27-32. Available from www.cs.cmu.edu/~javabayes/Download/jb- heading.ps.gz.
3. Ferson, S. 1993. Using fuzzy arithmetic in Monte Carlo simulation of fishery populations. Management strategies for exploited fish populations. Edited by T.J. Quinn II. Alaska Sea Grant College Program AK-SG-93-02. pp. 595-608.
4. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., and Rubin, D.B. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London.
5. Hammond, T.R., and Ellis, J.R. 2002. A meta-assessment for elasmobranches based on dietary data and Bayesian networks. Ecol. Ind. 1: 197-211.
6. Hammond, T.R., Swartzman, G., and Richardson, T.S. 2001. Bayesian estimation of fish school cluster composition applied to a Bering Sea acoustic survey. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 58: 1133-1149.
7. Jensen, F.V. 1996. An introduction to Bayesian networks. UCL Press, London.
8. Kaufmann, A., and Gupta, M.M. 1985. Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
9. Kuikka, S., Hilden, M., Gislason, H., Hansson, S., Sparholt, H., and Varis, O. 1999. Modelling environmentally driven uncertainties in Baltic cod (Gadhus morhud) management by Bayesian influence diagrams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 629-641.
10. Lauritzen, S.L., and Spiegelhalter, D.J. 1988. Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 50: 157-224.
11. Liermann, M., and Hilborn, R. 1997. Depensation in fish stocks: a hierarchic Bayesian meta-analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54(9): 1976-1984.
12. McAllister, M.K., and Ianelli, J.N. 1997. Bayesian stock assessment using catch-age data and the sampling-importance resampling algorithm. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54(2): 284-300.
13. McAllister, M.K., and Kirkwood, G.P. 1998a. Using Bayesian decision analysis to help achieve a precautionary approach for managing developing fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55(12): 2642-2661.
14. McAllister, M.K., and Kirkwood, G.P. 1998b. Bayesian stock assessment: a review and example application using the logistic model. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 55: 1031-1060.
15. Meyer, R., and Millar, R.B. 1999. BUGS in Bayesian stock assessments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1078-1086.
16. Oliver, R.M., and Smith, J.Q. 1990. Influence diagrams, belief nets and decision analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
17. Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif.
18. Punt, A.E., and Hilborn, R. 1997. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 7(1): 35-64.
19. Shenoy, P.P., and Shafer, G. 1990. Axioms for probability and belief function propagation. In UAI'88: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Edited by R.D. Shachter, T.S. Levitt, L.N. Kanal, and J.F. Lemmer. North-Holland, Amsterdam. pp. 169-198.
20. Varis, O. 1998. A belief network approach to optimization and parameter estimation: application to resource and environmental management. Artif. Intellig. 101: 135-163.
21. Varis, O., and Kuikka, S. 1997. Joint use of multiple environmental assessment models by a Bayesian meta-model: the Baltic salmon case. Ecol. Model. 102: 341-351.
22. Varis, O., and Kuikka, S. 1999. Learning Bayesian decision analysis by doing: lessons from environmental and natural resources management. Ecol. Model. 119: 177-195.
23. Walters, C., and Ludwig, D. 1994. Calculation of Bayes posterior probability distributions for key population parameters. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 713-722.
24. Zhang, N.L., and Poole, D. 1996. Exploiting causal independence in Bayesian networks inference. J. Artif. Intellig. Res. pp. 301-328.