Genetic variation in date palms propagated from offshoots and tissue culture

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 46-53

  Gurevich, Vyacheslav ^a   Lavi, Uri ^a   Cohen, Yuval ^a  

^a VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

AFLP; Phoenix dactylifera; Polymorphism; Somaclonal variation

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; PHOENIX DACLYLIFERA; PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA;

EID: 12744269362     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.130.1.46     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aitchitt, M., C.C. Ainsworth, and M. Thangavelu. 1993. A rapid and efficient method for the extraction of total DNA from mature leaves of the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Plant Mol. Biol. Rpt. 11:317-319.
2. Al-Khakifa, N.S. and E. Askari. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars from Saudi Arabia by DNA fingerprinting. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:1266-1270.
3. Al-Wasel, A. S. 2000. Vegetative and fruiting comparison of tissue culture derived and conventionally propagated date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Barhi trees. In Vitro Biol. Cellular Dev. Biol. 36:P-1010.
4. Azeqour, M., K. Majourhat, and M. Baaziz. 2002. Morphological variations and isoenzyme polymorphism of date palm clones from in vitro culture acclimatized and established on soil in South Morocco. Euphytica 123:57-66.
5. Barrow, S.C. 1998. Amonograph of Phoenix L. (Palmae: Coryphoideae). Kew Bul. 53:513-575.
6. Buntjer, J.B. 2001. PHYLTOOLS phylogenetic computer tools. Ver. 1.3. Wageningen Univ., The Netherlands, 1 June 2004. 〈http://www.spg.wau.nl/pv/ pub/pt/〉.
7. Cao, B.R. and C.-C.T. Chao. 2002. Identification of date cultivars in California using AFLP markers. HortScience 37:966-968.
8. Cohen, Y., R. Korchinsky, and E. Tripler. 2004. Flower abnormalities cause abnormal fruit setting in tissue culture propagated date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 79:1007-1013.
9. Corley, R.H.V., C.H. Lee, L.H. Law, and C.Y. Wong. 1986. Abnormal flower development in oil palm clones. Planter, Kuala Lumpur 62:233-240.
10. Corniquel, B. and L. Mercier. 1994. Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivar identification by RFLP and RAPD. Plant Sci. 101:163-172.
11. Devanand, P.S. and C.T. Chao. 2003. Genetic variation within 'Medjool' and 'Deglet Nur' date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars in California detected by fluorescent-AFLP markers. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 78:405-409.
12. Djerbi, M. 2000. Abnormal fruiting of the date palm derived from tissue culture. Proc. Date Palm Intl. Symp., Windhoek, Namibia. p. 73
13. Felsenstein, J. 1999. PHYLIP, phylogeny inference package. Ver. 3.5c. Univ. of Washington, 20 June 2004. 〈http://evolution.genetics.washington. edu/phylip.html〉.
14. Jaligot, E., T. Beule, and A. Rival. 2002. Methylation-sensitive RFLPs: Characterisation of two oil palm markers showing somaclonal variation-associated polymorphism. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104:1263-1269.
15. Jaligot, E., A. Rival, T. Beule, S. Dussert, and J.L. Verdeil. 2000. Somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): The DNA methylation hypothesis. Plant Cell Rpt. 19:684-690.
16. Kaeppler, S.M., H.F. Kaeppler, and Y. Rhee. 2000. Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 43:179-188.
17. Kashkush, K., J. Fang, E. Tomer, J. Hillel, and U. Lavi. 2001. Cultivar identification and genetic map of mango (Mangifera indica). Euphytica 122:129-136.
18. Matthes, M., R. Singh, S.C. Cheah, and A. Karp. 2001. Variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) tissue culture-derived regenerants revealed by AFLPs with methylation-sensitive enzymes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:971-979.
19. McCubbin, M.J., J. Van Staden, and A. Zaid. 2000. A Southern African survey conducted for off-types on date palms produced using somatic embryognesis. Proc. Date Palm Intl. Symp., Windhoek, Namibia. p. 68-72.
20. Nei, M. and W.H. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:5269-5273.
21. Page, R.D.M. 2000. TREEWIEW, Tree drawing software for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows. Ver. Univ. of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. 20 June 2004. 〈http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html〉.
22. Pritchard, J.K., M. Stephens, and P. Donelly. 2000. Interference of population structure from multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
23. Rohlf, F.J. 2000. NTSYSpc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, user guide. Ver. 2.1. Exeter Software, Setauket, N.Y.
24. Saker, M.M., S.A. Bekheet, H.S. Taha, A.S. Fahmy, and H.A. Moursy. 2000. Detection of somaclonal variations in tissue culture-derived date palm plants using isoenzyme analysis and RAPD fingerprints. Biol. Plant. 43:347-351.
25. Saker, M.M. and H.A. Moursi. 1999. Molecular characterization of Egyptian date palm cultivars: RAPD fingerprints. Arab J. Biotechnol.:71-78.
26. Schneider, S., D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier. 2000. ARLEQUIN, a software for populations genetic data analysis. Ver. 2.0. 20 June 2004. 〈 http://anthro.unige.ch/arlequin〉.
27. Sedra, M.H., P. Lashermes, P. Trouslot, M.C. Combes, and S. Hamon. 1998. Identification and genetic diversity analysis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties from Morocco using RAPD markers. Euphytica 103:75-82.
28. Swingle, W.T. 1945. Introduction of the Medjhool date from Africa into the United States. Date Growers' Inst. 22:15-16.
29. Vorster, B.J., K.J. Kunert, and C.A. Cullis. 2002. Use of representational difference analysis for characerization of sequence between date palm varieties. Plant Cell Rpt. 21:271-275.
30. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. Lee, M. Hornes, F.A. J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
31. Zaid, A. and P.F. De Wet. 1999. Date palm propogation, p. 74-106. In: A. Zaid (ed.). Date palm cultivation. Food Agr. Org., Rome.