Variation among populations of Diodia teres (Rubiaceae) in environmental maternal effects

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 124-131

  Hereford, J ^a   Moriuchi, K S ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diodia teres; Environmental maternal effects; Germination; Maternal effects; Population divergence; Reciprocal transplant; Seed weight

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MATERNAL EFFECT; SEED SIZE; SEEDLING;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PLANT SEED; RUBIACEAE; SEEDLING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ENVIRONMENT; RUBIACEAE; SEEDLING; SEEDS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

DIODIA TERES; RUBIACEAE;

EID: 12744262936     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00797.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Azevedo, R.B.R., French, V. & Partridge, L. 1997. Life-history consequences of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 150: 250-282.
2. Badyaev, A.V., Hill, G.E., Beck, M.L., Dervan, A.A., Duckworth, R.A., McGraw, K.J., Nolan, P.M. & Whittingham, L.A. 2002. Sex-biased hatching order and adaptive population divergence in a passerine bird. Science 295: 316-318.
3. Baskin, C.C. & Baskin, J.M. 1998. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego.
4. Bernardo, J. 1996. The particular maternal effect of propagule size, especially egg size: patterns, models, quality of evidence and interpretations. Am. Zool. 36: 216-236.
5. Byers, D.L., Plantenkamp, G.A.J. & Shaw, R.G. 1997. Variation in seed characters in Nemophila menziesii: evidence of a genetic basis for maternal effect. Evolution 51: 1445-1456.
6. Cohen, D. 1968. A general model of optimal reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J. Ecol. 56: 219-228.
7. Coulson, T., Kruuk, L.E.B., Tavecchia, G., Pemberton, J.M. & Glutton-Brock, T.H. 2003. Estimating selection on neonatal traits in red deer using elasticity path analysis. Evolution 57: 2879-2892.
8. Dolan, R.W. 1984. The effect of seed size and maternal source on individual size in a population of Ludwigia leptocarpa (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 71: 1302-1307.
9. Donohue, K. & Schmitt, J. 1999. The genetic architecture of plasticity to density in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 53: 1377-1386.
10. Endler, J. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
11. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
12. Fox, C.W., Waddell, K.J. & Mousseau, T.A. 1995. Parental host plant affects offspring life-histories in a seed beetle. Ecology 76: 402-411.
13. Fox, C.W., Thakar, M.S. & Mousseau, T.A. 1997. Egg size plasticity in a seed beetle: an adaptive maternal effect. Am. Nat. 149: 149-163.
14. Gomez, J.M. 2004. Bigger is not always better: conflicting selective pressures on seed size in Quercus ilex. Evolution 58: 71-80.
15. Hunt, J. & Simmons, L.W. 2002. The genetics of maternal care: direct and indirect genetic effects on phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 6828-6832.
16. Jordan, N. 1992. Path analysis of local adaptation in two ecotypes of the annual plant Diodia teres Walt. (Rubiaceae). Am. Nat. 140: 149-165.
17. Kalisz, S. 1986. Variable selection on the timing of germination in collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 40: 479-491.
18. Kearney, T.H. & Peebles, R.H. 1964. Arizona Flora. University of California Press, Los Angeles.
19. Kelly, C.A. 1992. Spatial and temporal variation in selection on correlated life-history traits and plant size in Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution 46: 1658-1673.
20. Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245-261.
21. Kirkpatrick, M. & Lande, R. 1989. The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43: 485-503.
22. Lacey, E.P. 1998. What is an adaptively induced parental effect? In: Maternal Effects as Adaptations (T. A. Mousseau & C. W. Fox, eds), pp. 54-66. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Latta, R.G. & Mitton, J.B. 1999. Historical separation and present gene flow through a zone of secondary contact in ponderosa pine. Evolution 53: 769-776.
24. Loveless, M.D. & Hamrick, J.L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 65-95.
25. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Inc., Sunderland.
26. Mazer, S. J. 1987. Parental effects on seed development and seed yield in Raphanus raphanistrum: implications for natural and sexual selection. Evolution 41: 355-371.
27. Mazer, S.J. & Wolfe, L.M. 1992. Planting density influences the expression of genetic variation in seed mass in wild radish (Raphinus sativus L.: Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79: 1185-1193.
28. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
29. Miao, S.L., Bazzaz, F.A. & Primack, R.B. 1991. Persistence of maternal nutrient effects in Plantago major - the third generation. Ecology 72: 1634-1642.
30. Montalvo, A.M. & Shaw, R.G. 1994. Quantitative genetics of sequential life-history and juvenile traits in the partially selfing perennial, Aquilegia caerulea. Evolution 48: 828-841.
31. Mousseau, T.A. 1991. Geographic variation in maternal-age effects on diapause in a cricket. Evolution 45: 1053-1059.
32. Mousseau, T.A. & Dingle, H. 1991. Maternal effects in insects: examples, constraints, and geographic variation. In: The Unity of Evolutionary Biology: Proceedings of the ICSEB IV Meeting (E. C. Dudley, ed.), pp. 745-761. Dioscordes Press, Portland.
33. Mousseau, T.A. & Fox, C.W. 1998. Maternal Effects as Adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York.
34. Platenkamp, G.A.J. & Shaw, R.G. 1993. Environmental and genetic maternal effects on seed characters in Nemophila menziesii. Evolution 47: 540-555.
35. Roach, D.A. & Wulff, R.D. 1987. Maternal effects in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 209-235.
36. Rossiter, M.C. 1991. Maternal effects generate variation in life history: consequences of egg weight plasticity in the gypsy moth. Funct. Ecol. 5: 386-393.
37. Rossiter, M.C. 1996. Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 451-476.
38. Rossiter, M.C. 1998. The role of environmental variation in parental effects expression. In: Maternal Effects as Adaptations (T. A. Mousseau & C. W. Fox, eds), pp. 112-134. Oxford University Press, New York.
39. SAS Institute, 1999. SAS Procedures Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute Cary, NC, USA.
40. Schaal, B.A. 1980. Reproductive capacity and seed size in Lupinus texensis. Am. J. Bot. 67: 703-709.
41. Schmid, B. & Dolt, C. 1994. Effects of maternal and paternal environment and genotype on offspring phenotype in Solidalgo altissima L. Evolution 48: 1525-1549.
42. Schmitt, J., Niles, J. & Wulff, R.D. 1992. Norms of reaction of seed traits to maternal environments in Plantago lanceolata. Am. Nat. 139: 451-466.
43. Stratton, D.A. 1989. Competition prolongs expression of maternal effects in seedlings of Erigeron annus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 76: 1646-1653.
44. van Tienderen, P.H. 2000. Elasticities and the link between demographic and evolutionary dynamics. Ecology 81: 666-679.
45. Weinig, C. 2000. Plasticity versus canalization: population differences in the timing of shade-avoidance responses. Evolution 54: 441-451.
46. Weller, S.G. 1985. Establishment of Lithospermum caroliniense on sand dunes: the role of nutlet mass. Ecology 66: 1893-1901.
47. Winn, A.A. 1988. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of seed size in Prunella vulgaris. Ecology 69: 1537-1544.
48. Winn, A.A. & Evans, A.S. 1991. Variation among populations of Prunella vulgaris L. in plastic responses to light. Funct. Ecol. 5: 562-571.
49. Wolfe, J.B. & Brodie, E.D. III 1998. The coadaptation of parental and offspring characters. Evolution 52: 299-308.