MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: Correlation with surgical and pathologic studies

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 274-279

  Yun, Sun Choi ^a,b   Kyung, Tai Lee ^a   Heung, Sik Kang ^b   Eun, Kyung Kim ^c  

^a Department of Diagnostic Radiology ^*

^b Eulji General Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Foot, abnormalities; Foot, MR; Normal variant

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; BONE PAIN; CARTILAGE DEGENERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EDEMA; FEMALE; FIBROSIS; FOOT PAIN; GRANULOMATOUS INFLAMMATION; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATHOLOGY; POSTERIOR TIBIAL TENDON DYSFUNCTION; SCAPHOID BONE; SOFT TISSUE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 12744262203     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.274     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Geist ES. Supernumerary bone of the foot: A roentgen study of the feet of 100 normal individuals. Am J Orthop Surg 1914;12:403
2. Kruse RW, Chen J. Accessory bones of the foot: clinical significance. Mil Med 1995;160:464-467
3. Lawson JP, Ogden JA, Sella E, Barwick KW. The painful accessory navicular. Skeletal Radiol 1984;13:250-262
4. Sella EJ, Lawson JP, Ogden JA. The accessory navicular synchondrosis. Clin Orthop 1986;209:280-285
5. Miller TT, Staron RB, Feldman F, Parisien M, Glucksman WJ, Gandolfo LH. The symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular bone: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1995;195:849-853
6. Demeyere N, De Maeseneer M, Osteaux M. Quiz case. Symptomatic type II accessory navicular. Eur J Radiol 2001;37:60-63
7. Romanowski CA, Barrington NA. The accessory navicular-an important cause of medial foot pain. Clin Radiol 1992;46:261-264
8. Mosel LD, Kat E, Voyvodic F. Imaging of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular bone. Australas Radiol 2004;48:267-271
9. Shah S, Achong DM. The painful accessory navicular bone: scintigraphic and radiographic correlation. Clin Nucl Med 1999;24:125-126
10. Grogan DP, Gasser SI, Ogden JA. The painful accessory navicular: a clinical and histopathological study. Foot Ankle 1989;10:164-169
11. Sella EJ, Lawson JP. Biomechanics of the accessory navicular synchondrosis. Foot Ankle 1987;8:156-163
12. Chen YJ, Hsu RW, Liang SC. Degeneration of the accessory navicular synchondrosis presenting as a rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1791-1798
13. Kidner FC. The prehallux in its relation to flat-foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1929;11:331
14. Chater EH. Foot pain and the accessory navicular bone. Irish J Med Sci 1962;442:471-475
15. Schweitzer ME, Caccese R, Karasick D, Wapner KL, Mitchell DG. Posterior tibial tendon tears: utility of secondary signs for MR-imaging diagnosis. Radiology 1993;188:655-659
16. Chen YJ, Shih HN, Huang TJ, Hsu RW. Posterior tibial tendon tear combined with a fracture of the accessory navicular: a new subclassification? J Trauma 1995;39:993-996
17. Kiter E, Erdag N, Karatosun V, Gunal I. Tibialis posterior tendon abnormalities in feet with accessory navicular bone and flatfoot. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:618-621
18. Kiter E, Gunal I, Karatosun V, Korman E. The relationship between the tibialis posterior tendon and the accessory navicular. Anat Anz 2000;182:65-68
19. Funk DA, Cass JR, Johnson KA. Acquired adult flatfoot secondary to posterior tibial-tendon pathology. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986;68:95-102
20. Rosenberg ZS, Cheung Y, Jahss MH, Noto AM, Norman A, Leeds NE. Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon: CT and MR imaging with surgical correlation. Radiology 1988;169:229-235
21. Khoury NJ, el-Khoury GY, Saltzman CL, Brandser EA. MR imaging of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:675-682
22. Rosenberg ZS. Chronic rupture of the posteior tibial tendon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1994;2:79-87