Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 116-123

  Engqvist, L ^a,b   Reinhold, K ^a  

^a Institut fur Evolutionsbiologie und Okologie   (Germany)

^b Inst Evolutionsbiologie Okologie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ejaculate size; Sexual selection; Sperm allocation; Sperm competition intensity; Sperm competition risk

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FORECASTING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REPRODUCTION; SPERMATOZOON; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FORECASTING; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REPRODUCTION; RESEARCH DESIGN; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 12744259983     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00792.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. (eds). 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
2. Brown, C.R. & Brown, M.B. 2003. Testis size increases with colony size in cliff swallows. Behav. Ecol. 14: 569-575.
3. Byrne, P.G., Roberts, J.D. & Simmons, L.W. 2002. Sperm competition selects for increased testes mass in Australian frogs. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 347-355.
4. Candolin, U. & Reynolds, J.D. 2002. Adjustments of ejaculation rates in response to risk of sperm competition in a fish, the bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1549-1553.
5. Cook, P.A. & Gage, M.J.G. 1995. Effects of risks of sperm competition on the numbers of eupyrene and apyrene sperm ejaculated by the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 261-268.
6. Danielsson, I. 2001. Antagonistic pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male body size in a water strider (Genis lacustris). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 77-81.
7. Dosen, L.D. & Montgomerie, R. 2004. Mate preferences by male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in relation to the risk of sperm competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 266-271.
8. Elgar, M.A., De Crespigny, F.E.C. & Ramamurthy, S. 2003. Male copulation behaviour and the risk of sperm competition. Anim. Behav. 66: 211-216.
9. Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. 1999a. Geographic variation in sperm production by Trinidadian guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 2083-2087.
10. Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. 1999b. Male mating behaviour and sperm production characteristics under varying sperm competition risk in guppies. Anim. Behav. 58: 1001-1006.
11. Evans, J.P., Pierotti, M. & Pilastro, A. 2003. Male mating behavior and ejaculate expenditure under sperm competition risk in the eastern mosquitofish. Behav. Ecol. 14: 268-273.
12. Fuller, R.C. 1998. Sperm competition affects male behaviour and sperm output in the rainbow darter. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 2365-2371.
13. Gage, A.R. & Barnard, C.J. 1996. Male crickets increase sperm number in relation to competition and female size. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 349-353.
14. Gage, M.J.G. 1991. Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Anim. Behav. 42: 1036-1037.
15. Gage, M.J.G. 1995. Continuous variation in reproductive strategy as an adaptive response to population density in the moth Plodia interpunctella. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261: 25-30.
16. Gage, M.J.G., Stockley, P. & Parker, G.A. 1995. Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 350: 391-399.
17. Galvani, A. & Johnstone, R. 1998. Sperm allocation in an uncertain world. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44: 161-168.
18. Harcourt, A.H., Harvey, P.H., Larson, S.G. & Short, R.V. 1981. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293: 55-57.
19. Hosken, D.J. 1998. Testes mass in megachiropteran bats varies in accordance with sperm competition theory. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44: 169-177.
20. Kappeler, P.M. 1997. Intrasexual selection and testis size in strepsirhine primates. Behav. Ecol. 8: 10-19.
21. Martin, O.Y. & Hosken, D.J. 2002. Strategic ejaculation in the common dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Anim. Behav. 63: 541-546.
22. Milinski, M. 1997. How to avoid seven deadly sins in the study of behavior. Adv. Study Behav. 26: 159-180.
23. Nicholls, E.H., Burke, T. & Birkhead, T.R. 2001. Ejaculate allocation by male sand martins, Riparia riparia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1265-1270.
24. Olsson, M. 2001. 'Voyeurism' prolongs copulation in the dragon lizard Ctenophorus fordi. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 378-381.
25. Oppliger, A., Hosken, D.J. & Ribi, G. 1998. Snail sperm production characteristics vary with sperm competition risk. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1527-1534.
26. Parker, G.A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525-567.
27. Parker, G.A. 1990. Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242: 127-133.
28. Parker, G.A. 1993. Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under adult control. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253: 245-254.
29. Parker, G.A. 1998. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller, eds), pp. 3-54. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
30. Parker, G.A., Ball, M.A., Stockley, P. & Gage, M.J.G. 1996. Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1291-1297.
31. Parker, G.A., Ball, M.A., Stockley, P. & Gage, M.J.G. 1997. Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1793-1802.
32. Parker, G.A., Simmons, L.W., Stockley, P., McChristie, D.M. & Charnov, E.L. 1999. Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content. Anim. Behav. 57: 795-805.
33. Pilastro, A., Scaggiante, M. & Rasotto, M.B. 2002. Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 9913-9915.
34. Pizzarri, T.K.C.C., Løvlie, H., Jakobsson, S. & Birkhead, T.B. 2003. Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature 426: 70-74.
35. Reinhardt, K. & Arlt, D. 2003. Ejaculate size variation in the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria. Behaviour 140: 319-332.
36. Reinhold, K., Kurtz, J. & Engqvist, L. 2002. Cryptic male choice: sperm allocation strategies when female quality varies. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 201-209.
37. Schaus, J.M. & Sakaluk, S.K. 2001. Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: not all species play games. Behav. Ecol. 12: 740-745.
38. Simmons, L.W. 2001. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
39. Simmons, L.W. & Kvarnemo, C. 1997. Ejaculate expenditure by male bushcrickets decreases with sperm competition intensity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1203-1208.
40. Simmons, L.W., Craig, M., Llorens, T., Schinzig, M. & Hosken, D.J. 1993. Bushcricket spermatophores vary in accord with sperm competition and parental investment theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 251: 183-186.
41. Simmons, L.W., Tomkins, J.L. & Hunt, J. 1999. Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 145-150.
42. Smith, R.L. (ed.) 1984. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. Academic Press, New York.
43. Stockley, F. & Seal, N.J. 2001. Plasticity in reproductive effort of male dung flies (Scatophaga stercoraria) as a response to larval density. Funct. Ecol. 15: 96-102.
44. Stockley, P., Gage, M.J.G., Parker, G.A. & Moller, A.P. 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149: 933-954.
45. Svärd, L. & Wiklund, C. 1989. Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 395-402.
46. Taborsky, M. 1998. Sperm competition in fish: 'bourgeois' males and parasitic spawning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 222-227.
47. Warner, R.R., Shapiro, D.Y., Marcanato, A. & Petersen, C.W. 1995. Sexual conflict - males with highest mating success convey the lowest fertilization benefits to females. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262: 135-139.