Predator feeding preferences for a benthic stream fish: Effects of visible injected marks

Journal of Freshwater Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 531-538

  Roberts, James H ^a   Kilpatrick, John M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLOR; MARKING METHOD; PERCIFORM; PREDATION RISK; PREY SELECTION;

AMBLOPLITES; AMBLOPLITES RUPESTRIS; ANHINGIDAE; ETHEOSTOMA; ETHEOSTOMA FLABELLARE; MICROPTERUS; MICROPTERUS DOLOMIEU; PERCIFORMES;

EID: 12544252238     PISSN: 02705060     EISSN: 21566941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2004.9664732     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Angermeier, P. L., 1992. Predation by rock bass on other stream fishes:experimental effects of depth and cover. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 34:171–180.
2. Angermeier, P. L., 1995. Ecological attributes of extinction-prone species:loss of freshwater fishes of Virginia. Conservation Biology, 9:143–158.
3. Bonneau, J. L., Thurow, R. F., and Scarnecchia, D. L., 1995. Capture, marking and enumeration of juvenile bull trout and cutthroat trout in small, low-conductivity streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 15:563–568.
4. Catalano, M. J., Chipps, S. R., Bouchard, M. A., and Wahl, D. H., 2001. Evaluation of injectable fluorescent tags for marking centrarchid fishes:retention rate and effects on vulnerability to predation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 21:911–917.
5. Chesson, J., 1978. Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology, 59:211–215.
6. Dewey, M. R., and Zigler, S. J., 1996. An evaluation of fluorescent elastomer for marking bluegills in experimental studies. The Progressive Fish Culturist, 58:219–220.
7. Emery, A. R., 1973. Preliminary comparisons of day and night habits of freshwater fish in Ontario. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30:761–774.
8. Goforth, R. R., and Foltz, J. W., 1998. Movements of the yellowfin shiner, Notropis lutipinnis. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 7:49–55.
9. Haines, G. B., and Modde, T., 1996. Evaluation of marking techniques to estimate population size and first-year survival of Colorado squawfish. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 16:905–912.
10. Hale, R. S., and Gray, J. H., 1998. Retention and detection of coded wire tags and elastomer tags in trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 18:197–201.
11. Hill, J., and Grossman, G. D., 1987. Effects of subcutaneous marking on stream fishes. Copeia, 1987:495–499.
12. Jenkins, R. E., and Burkhead, N. M., 1993. Freshwater Fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
13. Johnson, J. H., and Dropkin, D. S., 1993. Diel variation in diet composition of a riverine fish community. Hydrobiologia, 271:149–153.
14. Johnson, J. H., and Dropkin, D. S., 1995. Diel feeding chronology of six fish species in the Juniata River, Pennsylvania. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 10:11–18.
15. Keast, A., and Welsh, L., 1968. Daily feeding periodicities, food uptake rates, and dietary changes with hour of day in some lake fishes. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 25:1133–1144.
16. Kwak, T. J., Wiley, M. J., Osborne, L. L., and Larimore, R. W., 1992. Application of diel feeding chronology to habitat suitability analysis of warmwater stream fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49:1417–1430.
17. Labbe, T. R., and Fausch, K. D., 2000. Dynamics of intermittent stream habitat regulate persistence of a threatened fish at multiple scales. Ecological Applications, 10:1774–1791.
18. Lawler, G. H., and Smith, G. F. M., 1963. Use of coloured tags in fish population estimates. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 20:1431–1434.
19. Lythgoe, J. N., 1979. The ecology of vision Oxford, U.K.:Clarendon Press.
20. Malone, J. C., Forrester, G. E., and Steele, M. A., 1999. Effects of subcutaneous microtags on the growth, survival, and vulnerability to predation of small reef fishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 237:243–253.
21. Manly, B. F. J., 1974. A model for certain types of selection experiments. Biometries, 30:281–294.
22. McFarlane, G. A., Wydoski, R. S., and Prince, E. D., 1990. Historical review of the development of external tags and marks. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 7:9–29.
23. Power, M. E., 1987. Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams:importance of stream depth and prey size 333–352. Hanover:University Press of New Hampshire. W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, editors. Predation:Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities
24. Roberts, J. H., and Angermeier, P. L., In press. A comparison of injectable fluorescent marks in two genera of darters:effects on survival and retention rates. North American Journal of Fisheries Management.
25. Schlosser, I. J., 1982. Fish community structure and hnction along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecological Monographs, 52:395–414.
26. Schlosser, I. J., 1987. The role of predation in age- and size-related habitat use by stream fishes. Ecology, 68:651–659.
27. Schlosser, I. J., and Toth, L. A., 1984. Niche relationships and population ecology of rainbow (Etheostoma caeruleum) and fantail (E. flabellare) darters in a temporally variable environment. Oikos, 42:229–238.
28. Szendrey, T. A., and Wahl, D. H., 1995. Effect of feeding experience on growth, vulnerability to predation, and survival of esocids. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 15:610–620.
29. Van Deventer, J. S., and Platts, W. S., 1986. Microfish 3.0. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
30. Warren, M. L., Jr. 2000. Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the Southern United States. Fisheries, 25 (10):7–31. 11 Co-authors
31. Williamson, M., and Keast, A., 1988. Retinal structure relative to feeding in the rock bass Ambloplites rupestris and bluegill Lepomis macrochirus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66:2840–2846.
32. Willis, T. J., and Babcock, R. C., 1998. Retention and in situ detectability of visible implant fluorescent elastomer (VIFE) tags in Pagrus auratus (Sparidae). New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 32:247–254.
33. Zar, J. H., 1996. Biostatistical analysis Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.