Evaluation of cell proliferation in ear and lymph node using BrdU immunohistochemistry for mouse ear swelling test

Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 14, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 61-68

  Lee, Jong Kwon ^a   Park, Jae Hyun ^a   Kim, Hyung Soo ^a   Chung, Seung Tae ^a   Eom, Juno H ^a   Nam, Ki Taek ^a   Oh, Hye Young ^a  

^a Korea Food and Drug Administration   (South Korea)

Author keywords

BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine); Ear swelling; Immunohistochemistry; Lymph node; MEST

Indexed keywords

1 CHLORO 2,4 DINITROBENZENE; ALLERGEN; ALPHA HEXYLCINNAMALDEHYDE; BIOCHEMICAL MARKER; BROXURIDINE; CINNAMALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; IRRITANT AGENT; TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CELL ASSAY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EAR; EDEMA; FEMALE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPH NODE CELL; MOUSE; MOUSE EAR SWELLING TEST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TOXICITY TESTING;

CAVIA PORCELLUS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 12444328743     PISSN: 13826689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1382-6689(03)00025-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arts J.H.E., Droge S.C.M., Bloksma N., Kuper C.F. Local lymph node activation in rats after dermal application of the sensitizers 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene and trimellitic anhydride. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34:1996;55-62.
2. Asherson G.L., Ptak W. Contact and delayed hypersensitivity in the mouse. - I. Active sensitization and passive transfer. Immunology. 15:1968;405-416.
3. Bäck O., Larsen A. Contact sensitivity in mice evaluated by means of ear swelling and a radiometric test. J. Invest. Dermatol. 78:1982;309-312.
4. Botham P.A., Basketter D.A., Maurer T., Mueller D., Potokar M., Bontinck W. Skin sensitization - a critical review of predictive test methods in animals and man. Food Chem. Toxicol. 29:1991;275-286.
5. Boukhman M.P., Maibach H.I. Thresholds in contact sensitization: immunologic mechanisms and experimental evidence in humans - an overview. Food Chem. Toxicol. 39:2001;1125-1134.
6. Boussiquet-Leroux C., Durand-Cabagna G., Herlin H., Holder D. Evaluation of lymphocyte proliferation by immunohistochemistry in the local lymph node assay. J. Appl. Toxicol. 15:1995;465-475.
7. Buehler E.V. Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Arch. Dermatol. 91:1965;171-177.
8. Clottens F.L., Breyssens A., Raeve H.D., Demedts M., Nemery B. Assessment of the ear swelling test and the local lymph node assay in hamsters. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods. 35:1996;167-172.
9. Cornacoff J.B., House R.V., Dean J.H. Comparison of a radioisotopic incorporation method and the mouse ear swelling test (MEST) for contact sensitivity to weak sensitizers. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 10:1988;40-44.
10. Corsini E., Galli C.L. Epidermal cytokines in experimental dermatitis. Toxicology. 142:2000;203-211.
11. Dean J.H., Twerdok L.E., Tice R.R., Sailstad D.M., Hattan D.G., Stokes W.S. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. II. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34:2001;258-273.
12. Dunn B.J., Rusch G.M., Siglin J.C., Blaszck D. Variability of a mouse ear swelling test (MEST) in predicting weak and moderate contact sensitization. Fund. Appl. Pharmacol. 15:1990;242-248.
13. Gad S.C. The mouse ear swelling test (MEST) in the 1990s. Toxicology. 93:1994;33-46.
14. Gad S.C. The mouse ear swelling test. Burleson G.R., Dean J.H., Muson. Methods in Immunotoxicology. 2:1995;357-372 Wiley-Liss, New York.
15. Gad S.C., Weil G.S. Statistics for toxicologists. Hayes A.W. Principles and Methods of Toxicology. 1994;221-274 Raven, New York.
16. Gad S.C., Dunn B.J., Dobbs D.W., Reilly C., Walsh R.D. Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 84:1986;93-114.
17. Garrigue J.L., Nicolas J.F., Fraginals R., Benezra C., Bour H., Schmitt D. Optimization of the mouse ear swelling test for in vivo and in vitro studies of weak contact sensitizers. Cont. Dermat. 30:1994;231-237.
18. Gratzner H.G. Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo-and 5-iododeoxyuridine. A new reagent for detection of DNA replication. Science. 218:1982;474-475.
19. Haneke K.E., Tice R.R., Carson B.L., Margolin B.H., Stokes W.S. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. III. Data analyses completed by the national toxicology program interagency center for the evaluation of alternative toxicological methods. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34:2001;274-286.
20. Harkema J.R., Hotchkiss J.A., Barr E.B., Bennett C.B., Gallup M., Lee J.K., Basbaum C. Long-lasting effects of ozone exposure on rat nasal epithelium. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 20:1999;517-529.
21. Howell M.D., Manetz T.S., Meade B.J. Comparison of murine assays for the identification of chemical sensitizers. Toxicol. Methods. 10:2000;1-15.
22. Kashima R., Okada J., Ikeda Y. Lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for the assessment of sensitizing potentials of chemical compounds. Food Chem. Toxicol. 32:1994;831-836.
23. Kimber I., Dearman R.J., Scholes E.W., Basketter D.A. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. Toxicology. 93:1994;13-31.
24. Loveless S.E., Ladics G.S., Gerberick G.F., Ryan C.A., Basketter D.A., Scholes E.W., House R.V., Hilton J., Dearman R.J., Kimber I. Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. Toxicology. 108:1996;141-152.
25. Magnuson B., Kligman A.M. The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J. Invest. Dermatol. 52:1969;268-276.
26. Ryan C.A., Hulette B.C., Gerberick G.F. Approaches for the development of cell-based in vitro methods for contact sensitization. Toxicol. In Vitro. 15:2001;43-55.
27. Schutte B., Reynders M.M.J., Bosman F.T., Blijham G.H. Effect of tissue fixation on antibromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 35:1987;1343-1345.
28. Thorne P.S., Hillebrand J.A., Lewis G.R., Karol M.H. Contact sensitivity by diisocyanates: potencies and cross-reactivities. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 87:1987;155-165.