Motion sharpening and contrast: Gain control precedes compressive non-linearity?

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1187-1199

  Hammett, Stephen T ^a   Georgeson, Mark A ^b   Bedingham, Samantha ^a   Barbieri Hesse, Gillian S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSDUCER; VELOCITY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 12444274838     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00071-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson C.H., Van Essen D.C. Shifter circuits: A computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 84:1987;6297-6301.
2. Barbieri-Hesse G.S.A., Georgeson M.A. Template model for blur coding: The role of early nonlinearity in edge segmentation. Perception. 31(Suppl.):2002;54.
3. Barlow H.B. Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. Journal of Physiology (London). 141:1958;337-350.
4. Benardete E.A., Kaplan E. The dynamics of primate M retinal ganglion cells. Visual Neuroscience. 16:1999;355-368.
5. Berry M.J., Brivanlou I.H., Jordan T.A., Meister M. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature. 398:1999;334-338.
6. Bex P.J., Edgar G.K., Smith A.T. Sharpening of drifting, blurred images. Vision Research. 35:1995;2539-2546.
7. Burr D.C., Morgan M.J. Motion deblurring in human vision. Proceedings Of the Royal Society Of London B. 264:1997;431-436.
8. Burr D.C., Ross J., Morrone M.C. Seeing objects in motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 227:1986;249-265.
9. Chen S., Bedell H.E., Ogmen H. A target in real motion appears blurred in the absence of other proximal moving targets. Vision Research. 35:1995;2315-2328.
10. Finney D.J. Probit analysis. 1971;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Galvin S.J., O'Shea R.P., Squire A.M., Govan D.G. Sharpness overconstancy in peripheral vision. Vision Research. 37:1997;2035-2039.
12. Georgeson M.A. Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision. Vision Research. 25:1987;765-780.
13. Galvin S.J., O'Shea R.P., Squire A.M., Hailstone D.S. Sharpness overconstancy: The roles of visibility and current context. Vision Research. 39:1999;2649-2657.
14. Georgeson M.A. Seeing edge blur: Receptive fields as multi-scale neural templates. Journal of Vision. 1:2001;438.
15. Georgeson M.A., Barbieri-Hesse G.S.A., Freeman T.C.A. The primal sketch re-visited: Locating and representing edges in human vision via Gaussian-derivative filtering. Perception. 31(Suppl.):2002;1.
16. Georgeson M.A., Hammett S.T. Seeing blur: 'motion sharpening' without motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 269:2002;1429-1434.
17. Gorea A., Tyler C.W. New look at Bloch's law for contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 3:1986;52-61.
18. Hammett S.T. Motion blur and motion sharpening in the human visual system. Vision Research. 37:1997;2505-2510.
19. Hammett S.T., Bex P.J. Motion sharpening: Evidence for the addition of high spatial frequencies to the effective neural image. Vision Research. 36:1996;2729-2733.
20. Hammett S.T., Georgeson M.A., Gorea A. Motion blur and motion sharpening: Temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity. Vision Research. 38:1998;2099-2108.
21. Hochstein S., Shapley R.M. Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology. 262:1976;265-284.
22. Legge G.E. Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties. Vision Research. 18:1978;69-81.
23. Martin K.E., Marshall J.A. Unsmearing visual motion: Development of long range horizontal intrinsic connections. Hanson S.J., Cowan J.D., Giles C.L. Advances in neural information processing systems. Vol. 5:1953;Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA.
24. Morrone M.C., Burr D.C. Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 235:1988;221-245.
25. Ögmen H. A neural theory of retino-cortical dynamics. Neural Networks. 6:1993;245-273.
26. Pääkkönen A.K., Morgan M.J. Effects of motion on blur discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 11:1994;992-1002.
27. Pääkkönen A.K., Morgan M.J. Linear mechanisms can produce motion sharpening. Vision Research. 41:2001;2771-2777.
28. Purushothaman G., Lacassagne D., Bedell H.E., Ogmen H. Effect of exposure duration, contrast and base blur on coding and discrimination of edges. Spatial Vision. 15:2002;341-376.
29. Purushothaman G., Ogmen H., Chen S., Bedell H.E. Motion deblurring in a neural network model of retino-cortical dynamics. Vision Research. 38:1998;1827-1842.
30. Ramachandran V.S., Rao V., Vidyasgar T.R. Sharpness constancy during movement perception. Perception. 3:1974;97-98.
31. Shapley R.M., Victor J.D. The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology. 285:1978;275-298.
32. Shapley R.M., Victor J.D. Nonlinear spatial summation and the contrast gain control of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology. 290:1979;141-161.
33. Shapley R.M., Victor J.D. How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology. 318:1981;161-179.
34. Taylor M.M., Creelman C.D. PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 41:1967;782-787.
35. Watson A.B., Nachmias J. Patterns of temporal interaction in the detection of gratings. Vision Research. 17:1977;893-902.