Important preoperative prognostic factors for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement in cases with radical retropubic prostatectomy

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 369-373

  Ozgur A ^a   Onol F F ^a   Turkeri L N ^a  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Gleason score; Prostate neoplasm

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMINAL VESICLE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STUDENT T TEST; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

AGED; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, MALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEMINAL VESICLES;

EID: 12444270089     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-004-0746-z     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. C Mettlin 1997 The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project and national patterns of prostate cancer detection and treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 47 265-272
2. GS Gerber RA Thisted PT Scardino et al. 1996 Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 276 615-619 10.1001/jama.276.8.615 1:STN:280:BymA28bmvFc%3D 8773633
3. H Zincke JE Oesterling ML Blute et al. 1994 Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol 152 1850-1857 1:STN:280:ByqD3MfotVA%3D 7523733
4. ML Blute EJ Bergstralh A Iocca et al. 2001 Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 165 119-125
5. L Cheng J Slezak EJ Bergstralh et al. 2000 Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 18 15 2862-2868
6. AV D'amico R Whittington SB Malkowicz et al. 1998 The combination of preoperative prostate specific antigen and postoperative pathological findings to predict prostate specific antigen outcome in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 160 2096-2101
7. AV D'amico R Whittington SB Malkowicz et al. 2000 Clinical Utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 18 6 1164-1172
8. RC Smith AW Partin JI Epstein et al. 1996 Extended follow-up of the influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and extensive capsular perforation. J Urol 156 454-458
9. AW Partin MW Kattan EN Subong et al. 1997 Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer: A multi-institutional update J Am Med Assoc 277 1445
10. DJ Grossklaus CS Coffey SB Shappell et al. 2002 Percent of cancer in biopsys et predicts pathological findings after prostatectomy. J Urol 167 2032-2036
11. SJ Freedland GS Csathy F Dorey et al. 2002 Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score. J Urol 167 516-520
12. RA Stephensen RG Middleton TM Abbott 1997 Wide excision (nonnerve sparing) radical retropubic prostatectomy using an initial perirectal dissection. J Urol 157 251-255
13. JA Wieder MS Soloway 1994 Incidence, etiology, location, prevention, and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 152 1850-1857 1:STN:280:ByqD3MfotVA%3D 7523733
14. ML Blute DG Bostwick TM Seay et al. 1998 Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma: The impact of margin status. Cancer 82 902-908
15. L Cheng MF Darson EJ Bergstralh et al. 1997 Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension after radical prostatectomy. Urology 50 733-739
16. S Vida V Bhargava K Shinohara et al. 1999 Number of positive systematic sextant biopsies predicts surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy. Urology 54 689-693
17. VS Tigrani V Bhargava K Shinohara et al. 1999 Number of positive systematic sextant biopsies predicts surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy. Urology 54 689-693
18. RB Watson F Civantos MS Soloway 1996 Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: Detailed pathological analysis and prognosis. Urology 48 80-90