Evaluating spatial design techniques for solving land-use allocation problems

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 121-142

  Aerts, Jeroen C J H ^a   Van Herwijnen, Marjan ^a   Janssen, Ron ^a   Stewart, Theodor J ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; LAND USE PLANNING; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING METHOD; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 12444265775     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0964056042000308184     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aarts, E. & Korst, J. (1989) Simulated Annealing and Boltzman Machines. A Stochastic Approach to Combinatorial Optimization and Neural Computing (New York: John Wiley).
2. Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2002) Spatial decision support for resource allocation, integration of optimization, uncertainty analysis and visualization techniques, PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam (Amsterdam: Thela Thesis publishers).
3. Aerts, J. C. J. H. & Heuvelink, G. B. M. (2002) Using Simulating annealing for resource allocation, International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 16, pp. 571-587
4. Aerts, J. C. J. H., Eisinger, E., Heuvelink, G. & Stewart, T. J. (2003) Multi-site land use allocation for spatial decision support using integer programming, Geographical Analysis, 35, pp. 512-534.
5. Brookes, C. J. (1997) A parameterized region-growing program for site allocation on raster suitability maps, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11, pp. 375-396.
6. Boston, K. & Bettinger, P. (1999) An analysis of Monte Carlo integer programming, Simulated annealing, and Tabu search heuristics for solving spatial harvest scheduling problems, Forest Science, 45, pp. 292-301.
7. Church, R. L. (2002) Geographical Information Systems and location science, Computers and Operations Research, 29, pp. 541-562.
8. Church, R. L., Stoms, D. M. & Davis, F. W. (1996) Reserve selection as a maximal covering allocation problem, Biological Conservation, 76, pp. 105-112.
9. Cova, T. J. (1999) A general framework for optimal site search, PhD Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
10. Cova, T. J. & Church, R. L. (2000a) Contiguity constraints for single-region site search problems, Geographical Analysis, 32, pp. 306-329.
11. Cova, T. J. & Church, R. L. (2000b) Exploratory spatial optimization in site search: a neighborhood operator approach, Computers Environment and Urhan Systems, 24, pp. 401-419.
12. Diamond, J. T. & Wright, J. R. (1989) Efficient land allocation, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 115, pp. 81-96.
13. Fonseca, C. M. & Fleming, P. J. (1995) An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multi objective optimization, Evolutionary Computation 3, pp. 1-16.
14. Greenberg, H. J. (2002) Mathematical Programming Glossary. Available at http://www.cudenver.edu/~hgreenbe/glossary/glossary.html
15. Jaszkiewicz, A. (2002) Genetic local search for multi-objective combinatorial optimization, European Journal of Operations Research 137, pp. 50-71.
16. Jones, G. J. Meneghin, B. J. & Kirby, M. W. (1991) Formulating adjacency constraints in linear optimization models for scheduling projects in tactical planning, Forest Science, 37, pp.1283-1297.
17. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) Optimization by Simulated annealing, Science, 220, pp. 671-680.
18. Laarhoven, P. J. M. (1987) Theoretical and computational aspects of Simulated annealing, PHD Thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
19. Levine, B. (2002) Presentation for EE652. Available at http://microsys6.engr.utk.edu/~levine/EE652/Slides/tsld001.htm
20. Lockwood, C. & Moore, T. (1993) Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: a Simulated annealing approach, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, pp. 468-478.
21. Malczewski, J. (1999) GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis (New York: John Wiley).
22. Murray, A. T. & Church, R. L. (1995) Measuring the efficacy of adjacency constraint structure in forest planning models, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25, pp. 1416-1424.
23. O'Connell, I. & Keller, C. P. (2002) Design of decision support for stakeholder driven collaborative land valuation, Environment and Planning B, 29, pp. 607-628.
24. Ridgley, M., Penn, D. C. & Tran, L. (1997) Multicriterion decision support for a conflict over stream diversion and land-water reallocation in Hawaii, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 83, pp. 153-172.
25. Steuer, R. (1986) The Tchebycheff procedure of interactive multiple objective programming, in: B. Karpak & S. Zionts (Eds) Multiple Objective Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Micro Computers (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).
26. Stewart, T. J. (1991) A multi criteria decision support system for R& D project selection, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42, pp.1369-1389.
27. Stewart, T. J., Herwijnen, M. & Janssen, J. (2002) A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Multi Objective Land Use Planning (Under review).
28. Sundermann, E. (1995) PET Image reconstruction using Simulated annealing, in: Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging 1995 Conference, San Diego, Image Processing, pp. 378-386.
29. White, R. & Engelen, G. (1997) Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modelling, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, pp. 235-246.
30. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1999) Reference point approaches, in: T. Gal, T. J. Stewart & T. Hanne (Eds) Multi Criteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
31. Williams, J. C. & Revelle, C. S. (1998) Reserve assemblage of critical areas: a zero-one programming approach, European Journal of Operations Research, 104, pp, 497-509.
32. Wright, J., Revelle, C. S. & Cohon, J. (1983) A multi-objective integer programming model for the land acquisition problem, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12, pp. 31-53.