The influence of defocus on multifocal visual evoked potentials

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 243, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 38-42

  Pieh, Christina ^a   Hoffmann, Michael B ^b   Bach, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MAGDEBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MONOCULAR VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; REFRACTION ERROR; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 12444251189     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-0969-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arai M, de Faria JML, Hirose T (1999) Effects of stimulus blocking, light scattering, and distortion on multifocal electroretinogram. Jpn J Ophthalmol 43:481-489 10.1016/S0021-5155(99)00119-7
2. Bach M (1996) The Freiburg visual acuity test - automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 73:49-53 1:STN:280:ByiD387jt1Y%3D
3. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T (1994) The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalo Clin Neurophysiol 90:65-81 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90114-7
4. Berman MS, Seki S (1982) Blur-induced changes in the visual evoked potential. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 59:556-560 1:STN:280:BiyD3Mbps1A%3D
5. Brindley GS (1972) The variability of the human striate cortex. J Physiol 225:1P-3P 1:STN:280:CSyD3M7gslQ%3D
6. Chan HL, Siu AW, Yap MK, Brown B (2002) The effect of light scattering on multifocal electroretinography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 22:482-490 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00052.x
7. Charman WN (1991) Wavefront aberration of the eye: A review. Optom Vis Sci 68:574-583 1:STN:280:By2D3MblvVU%3D
8. Hoffmann MB, Straube S, Bach B (2003) Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal VEP responses. J Vis 3:432-439 12901714
9. Hood DC, Greenstein VC (2003) Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22:201-251 10.1016/S1350-9462(02)00061-7
10. Hood DC, Zhang X (2000) Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: Comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100:115-137 10.1023/A:1002727602212
11. Katsumi O, Hirose T, Sakaue H, Mehta M, Rosenstein RB (1990) Effect of optical defocus on the steady state pattern reversal visual-evoked response. Ophthalmic Res 22:383-390 1:STN:280:By6B3M3gvFI%3D
12. Klistorner AI, Graham SL (2001) Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: Effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:2145-2152 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvjtlKntg%3D%3D
13. Marmor MF, Hood DC, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger MW, Miyake Y (2003) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 106:105-115 10.1023/A:1022591317907
14. Palmowski AM, Berningerm T, Allgayer R, Andrielis H, Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Rudolph G (1999) Effects of refractive blur on the multifocal electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 99:41-54 10.1023/A:1002432113628
15. Steinmetz H, Furst G, Meyer BU (1989) Craniocerebral topography within the international 10-20 system. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:499-506 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90227-7
16. Stensaas SS, Eddington DK, Dobelle WH (1974) The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. J Neurosurg 40:747-755
17. Sutter EE (1991) The fast m-transform: A fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. SIAM J Comput 20:686-694
18. Walsh G, Charman WN (1989) The effect of defocus on the contrast and phase of the retinal image of a sinusoidal grating. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 9:398-404 10.1016/0275-5408(89)90256-1
19. Zhang X, Hood DC, Chen CS, Hong JE (2002) A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: An objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol 104:287-302 10.1023/A:1015220501743